Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (CAN1768527698)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of Canopy Cancer Care's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts Canopy Cancer Care Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Canopy Cancer Care breach identified under incident ID CAN1768527698.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Canopy Cancer Care's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/canopy-cancer-care, the number of followers: 801, the industry type: Hospitals and Health Care and the number of employees: 46 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 626 and after the incident was 542 with a difference of -84 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Canopy Cancer Care and their customers.
Canopy Health recently reported "Two Major Health Data Breaches in New Zealand’s Healthcare Sector", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.
New Zealand’s healthcare sector faced two significant cyber incidents involving Canopy Health and Manage My Health (MMH), exposing vulnerabilities in patient data protection and sparking public frustration over delayed disclosures.
The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Administrative systems (Canopy Health), Health documents portal (MMH), and exposing Patient data (Canopy Health), 430,000 documents (MMH), with nearly 430,000 documents (MMH) records at risk.
In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Breach contained (Canopy Health), High Court injunctions (MMH), and stakeholders are being briefed through Delayed disclosure (Canopy Health), Public statement (MMH).
The case underscores how Ongoing, teams are taking away lessons such as Need for mandatory multi-factor authentication (MFA), Timely breach disclosures, Strengthening baseline security measures, Balancing accessibility and security in healthcare data systems, and recommending next steps like Implement MFA, Improve incident response timelines, Enhance security audits, Increase public transparency, Strengthen regulatory oversight, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Public statements (Canopy Health, MMH).
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access was detected in part of its administrative systems and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating exploited security gaps...absence of mandatory multi-factor authentication (MFA). Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Brute Force (T1110) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating basic lapses in MMH’s defenses...absence of mandatory multi-factor authentication (MFA). Under the Discovery tactic, the analysis identified Account Discovery (T1087) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating patient data potentially copied...430,000 documents exposed. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating 430,000 documents from the portal’s health documents section exposed and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating patient data...was compromised via administrative systems. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating data breach affecting 127,000 patients...data stolen (MMH) and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating hacker...demanding a ransom...data exfiltration confirmed. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating financially motivated attack...ransom demanded (MMH) and Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data Manipulation (T1565.002) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating public frustration over notification delays...erosion of public trust. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating absence of mandatory multi-factor authentication (MFA)...basic security lapses. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- Canopy Cancer Care Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/canopy-cancer-care/incident/CAN1768527698
- Canopy Cancer Care CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/canopy-cancer-care
- Canopy Cancer Care Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/can1768527698-canopy-health-breach-january-2026/
- Canopy Cancer Care CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/canopy-cancer-care/history
- Canopy Cancer Care CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://thespinoff.co.nz/the-bulletin/13-01-2026/new-health-data-breach-increases-scrutiny-on-private-health-it
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf