Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (CAM1783996099)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of Cambridge Mobile Telematics's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts Cambridge Mobile Telematics Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Cambridge Mobile Telematics breach identified under incident ID CAM1783996099.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Cambridge Mobile Telematics's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/cambridge-mobile-telematics, the number of followers: 16966, the industry type: Software Development and the number of employees: 481 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 755 and after the incident was 644 with a difference of -111 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Cambridge Mobile Telematics and their customers.
On 02 June 2026, Cambridge Mobile Telematics (CMT) disclosed Ransomware issues under the banner "Cyberattack on Cambridge Mobile Telematics Exposes Sensitive Driver Data".
On June 2, 2026, the ransomware group CoinbaseCartel claimed responsibility for a cyberattack targeting Cambridge Mobile Telematics (CMT), a Massachusetts-based telematics and insurtech company.
The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Driving behavior records, location data, personally identifiable information (PII).
Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.
The case underscores how Under investigation.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating cyberattack targeting Cambridge Mobile Telematics (CMT) and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating account credentials may be part of compromised PII. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (T1552.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating account credentials may be part of compromised PII and OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating pII including account credentials compromised. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating driving behavior records, location data, PII compromised and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating insurance details and user profiles exposed. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware group threatened to leak stolen data and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating data exfiltration threatened by ransomware group. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating incident type is ransomware and Defacement (T1491) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating threatened to leak stolen data unless negotiations. Under the Command and Control tactic, the analysis identified Application Layer Protocol (T1071) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware group CoinbaseCartel claimed responsibility. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- Cambridge Mobile Telematics Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/cambridge-mobile-telematics/incident/CAM1783996099
- Cambridge Mobile Telematics CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/cambridge-mobile-telematics
- Cambridge Mobile Telematics Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/cam1783996099-cambridge-mobile-telematics-ransomware-june-2026/
- Cambridge Mobile Telematics CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/cambridge-mobile-telematics/history
- Cambridge Mobile Telematics CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://www.classactionlawyers.com/blog/cmt
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf