Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Cambridge Management, Inc. » CAM1787099141

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (CAM1787099141)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-57
Company Score Before Incident756 / 1000
Company Score After Incident699 / 1000
Company LinkView Cambridge Management, Inc. Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERCAM1787099141
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDPersonally Identifiable Information (PII)
INCIDENT DATE16/08/2026
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Cambridge Management, Inc.'s Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Cambridge Management, Inc. Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Cambridge Management, Inc. breach identified under incident ID CAM1787099141.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Cambridge Management, Inc.'s information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/cambridge-management-inc, the number of followers: 1347, the industry type: Real Estate and the number of employees: 205 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 756 and after the incident was 699 with a difference of -57 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Cambridge Management, Inc. and their customers.

On 18 August 2026, Cambridge Management Inc. disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Cambridge Management Inc. Faces Class Action Over Data Breach Exposing Consumer PII".

A proposed class of consumers filed a lawsuit against Cambridge Management Inc., a property management company, alleging the firm failed to safeguard their personally identifiable information (PII) after hackers breached its systems.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Personally Identifiable Information (PII).

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

The case underscores how Ongoing.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), with evidence including hackers breached its systems, and alleged negligence in safeguarding sensitive consumer data and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating failed to safeguard their personally identifiable information (PII). Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating alleged negligence in protecting sensitive consumer data and OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating personally Identifiable Information (PII) compromised. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating personally Identifiable Information (PII) compromised. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), with evidence including hackers breached its systems, and pII exposed in data breach. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating data breach exposing consumer PII and Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating alleged negligence in safeguarding sensitive data. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Disabling Security Tools (T1089) with moderate confidence (50%), with evidence including failed to safeguard their PII, and negligence in protecting sensitive data. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Valid Accounts (60%)
Credential Access
Unsecured Credentials (70%)
OS Credential Dumping (40%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Impact
Data Destruction (30%)
Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (40%)
Defense Evasion
Disabling Security Tools (50%)

Sources & References