Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Caldwell Sutter Capital, Inc. » CAL1781295922

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (CAL1781295922)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-74
Company Score Before Incident746 / 1000
Company Score After Incident672 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERCAL1781295922
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORThird-party vendor compromise
DATA EXPOSEDPersonally identifiable information (PII), financial...
INCIDENT DATE21/04/2026
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Caldwell Sutter Capital, Inc.'s Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Caldwell Sutter Capital, Inc. Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Caldwell Sutter Capital, Inc. breach identified under incident ID CAL1781295922.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Caldwell Sutter Capital, Inc.'s information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/caldwell-sutter-capital-inc, the number of followers: 264, the industry type: Investment Management and the number of employees: 18 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 746 and after the incident was 672 with a difference of -74 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Caldwell Sutter Capital, Inc. and their customers.

On 29 May 2026, Caldwell Sutter Capital, Inc. disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Caldwell Sutter Capital Data Breach Exposes Sensitive Financial Information".

Shamis & Gentile P.A.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Personally identifiable information (PII), financial account details, with nearly 663 records at risk.

In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Written notices to affected individuals on May 29, 2026.

The case underscores how Ongoing, teams are taking away lessons such as Risks associated with third-party vendor vulnerabilities in financial services, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Written notices sent to affected individuals on May 29, 2026.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Trusted Relationship (T1199) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating breach, linked to a third-party service provider, FoxTrot LLC. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Steal Application Access Token (T1528) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating third-party vendor vulnerabilities in financial services and OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating social Security numbers, account numbers compromised. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating names, Account numbers, Social Security numbers exposed. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating 663 individuals PII exposed via third-party compromise and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating third-party service provider (FoxTrot LLC) involved. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating investigation remains ongoing, potential data misuse and Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data Manipulation (T1565.002) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating financial account details compromised, high identity theft risk. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Trusted Relationship (90%)
Credential Access
Steal Application Access Token (70%)
OS Credential Dumping (60%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Transfer Data to Cloud Account (50%)
Impact
Data Destruction (40%)
Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data Manipulation (50%)

Sources & References