Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Caf de l'HéraultCaf de l'Hérault
VS
RijkswaterstaatRijkswaterstaat
Caf de l'Hérault

Caf de l'Hérault

139, Avenue de Lodève, Montpellier, Occitanie, 34080, FR

Last Update: 31/01/2026

View Profile

La caisse d’Allocations familiales de l’Hérault est un organisme de Sécurité sociale (branche Famille) de droit privé qui assure une mission de service public. La CAF de l’Hérault œuvre au quotidien auprès de 297 048 allocataires grâce à l’investissement de plus de 807 ...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:178
Subsidiaries:26
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Rijkswaterstaat

Rijkswaterstaat

Koningskade 4, Den Haag, 2500 EX, NL

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
783/1000Fair

Rijkswaterstaat is de uitvoeringsorganisatie van het Ministerie van Infrastructuur en Waterstaat. We beheren en ontwikkelen de rijkswegen, -vaarwegen en –wateren en zetten in op een duurzame leefomgeving. Samen met andere organisaties werken we aan een land dat bescher...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:12,096
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Caf de l'Hérault

Caf de l'Hérault

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Rijkswaterstaat

Rijkswaterstaat

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Caf de l'Hérault in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rijkswaterstaat in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Caf de l'Hérault (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Caf de l'Hérault cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Rijkswaterstaat (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rijkswaterstaat cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Caf de l'Hérault

Caf de l'Hérault

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Rijkswaterstaat

Rijkswaterstaat

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Caf de l'Hérault company and Rijkswaterstaat company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Caf de l'Hérault company and Rijkswaterstaat company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Caf de l'Hérault company and Rijkswaterstaat company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Caf de l'Hérault company and Rijkswaterstaat company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Caf de l'Hérault company and Rijkswaterstaat company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Caf de l'Hérault company and Rijkswaterstaat company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Caf de l'Hérault company and Rijkswaterstaat company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Caf de l'Hérault company and Rijkswaterstaat company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Caf de l'Hérault company and Rijkswaterstaat company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Caf de l'Hérault company and Rijkswaterstaat company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Caf de l'Hérault company and Rijkswaterstaat company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Caf de l'Hérault and Rijkswaterstaat, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Caf de l'Hérault and Rijkswaterstaat, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Caf de l'Hérault or Rijkswaterstaat ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Caf de l'Hérault or Rijkswaterstaat ?
Between Caf de l'Hérault and Rijkswaterstaat, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Caf de l'Hérault and Rijkswaterstaat, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA