Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Caisse nationale des allocations familiales - Cnaf » MINCAF1766073386

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (MINCAF1766073386)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-35
Company Score Before Incident775 / 1000
Company Score After Incident740 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERMINCAF1766073386
Type of Cyber IncidentCyber Attack
ATTACK VECTORCompromised employee personal accounts (alleged)
DATA EXPOSED15 GB of data, 22...
INCIDENT DATE16/12/2025
STATUSOngoing (22-year-old suspect arrested)

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Caisse nationale des allocations familiales - Cnaf's Cyber Attack and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Caisse nationale des allocations familiales - Cnaf Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Caisse nationale des allocations familiales - Cnaf breach identified under incident ID MINCAF1766073386.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Caisse nationale des allocations familiales - Cnaf's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/caf-allocations-familiales, the number of followers: 123010, the industry type: Government Administration and the number of employees: 4199 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 775 and after the incident was 740 with a difference of -35 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Caisse nationale des allocations familiales - Cnaf and their customers.

Caisse d'Allocations Familiales (CAF) recently reported "Alleged Cyberattack on Caisse d'Allocations Familiales (CAF) by Hacker Indra", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

Hacker Indra claimed to have compromised the systems of the Caisse d'Allocations Familiales (CAF) and published 15 GB of data containing personal information of nearly 4 million allocataires.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing 15 GB of data, 22 million lines of information, with nearly 22 million lines of information (allegedly 4 million allocataires) records at risk.

In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Public denial of breach, clarification on data origin.

The case underscores how Ongoing (22-year-old suspect arrested), with advisories going out to stakeholders covering CAF issued a public statement denying the breach and clarifying data origin.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts: Local Accounts (T1078.003) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating hijacking personal email accounts of ministry employees and Phishing: Spearphishing Link (T1566.002) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating compromised employee personal accounts (alleged). Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Brute Force: Password Guessing (T1110.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating alleged compromise of employee personal accounts and Credentials from Password Stores (T1555) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating access to sensitive police databases (TAJ, FPR). Under the Lateral Movement tactic, the analysis identified Remote Services: Remote Desktop Protocol (T1021.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating access to interconnected public-sector networks. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Information Repositories: Sharepoint (T1213.002) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating 15 GB of data containing 22M lines of personal info and Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating exfiltration of names, birthdates, emails, phone numbers. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over Web Service: Exfiltration to Cloud Storage (T1567.002) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating data published on Breachforums cybercrime forum and Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating 15 GB of data exfiltrated (alleged). Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with lower confidence (10%), supported by evidence indicating no evidence of ransomware or encryption, Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (10%), supported by evidence indicating no evidence of data destruction, and Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating cAF denies breach; data origin unclear. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts: Local Accounts (T1078.003) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating use of compromised employee accounts to evade detection and Hide Artifacts: Hidden Files and Directories (T1564.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating no technical breach detected (CAF statement). These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Valid Accounts: Local Accounts (80%)
Phishing: Spearphishing Link (60%)
Credential Access
Brute Force: Password Guessing (50%)
Credentials from Password Stores (60%)
Lateral Movement
Remote Services: Remote Desktop Protocol (70%)
Collection
Data from Information Repositories: Sharepoint (70%)
Data from Local System (70%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over Web Service: Exfiltration to Cloud Storage (80%)
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (60%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (10%)
Data Destruction (10%)
Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (30%)
Defense Evasion
Valid Accounts: Local Accounts (70%)
Hide Artifacts: Hidden Files and Directories (50%)

Sources & References