Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (CAB1772620400)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of Cabka's Cyber Attack and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts Cabka Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Cabka breach identified under incident ID CAB1772620400.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Cabka's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/cabka, the number of followers: 10959, the industry type: Packaging and Containers Manufacturing and the number of employees: 271 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 738 and after the incident was 730 with a difference of -8 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Cabka and their customers.
On 04 March 2026, Cabka disclosed Cyberattack issues under the banner "Cabka Cyberattack: Systems Isolated as Investigation Continues".
On March 4, 2026, European sustainable packaging manufacturer Cabka disclosed a cybersecurity incident affecting certain IT systems.
The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Certain IT systems.
In response, teams activated the incident response plan, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Isolated impacted systems.
The case underscores how Ongoing.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating cybersecurity incident affecting certain IT systems and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating attack was detected over the preceding weekend. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution (T1204) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating incident response protocol activated. Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Account Manipulation (T1098) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating isolating impacted systems to contain the breach. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating isolating impacted systems to contain the breach. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Brute Force (T1110) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating assessing whether personal or commercially sensitive data was accessed. Under the Discovery tactic, the analysis identified Account Discovery (T1087) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating external cybersecurity experts engaged to conduct forensic investigation. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating assessing whether personal or commercially sensitive data was accessed. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating data exfiltration such as Under assessment. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Endpoint Denial of Service (T1499) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating isolating impacted systems to contain the breach. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- Cabka Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/cabka/incident/CAB1772620400
- Cabka CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/cabka
- Cabka Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/cab1772620400-cabka-cyber-attack-march-2026/
- Cabka CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/cabka/history
- Cabka CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://www.ideal-investisseur.fr/en/stock-news/cabka-hit-by-cyberattack-systems-isolated-investigation-underway/15023.html
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf