Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

BYOjetBYOjet
VS
HertzHertz
BYOjet

BYOjet

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, AU

Last Update: 08/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://byojet.com.au
757/1000Fair

BYOjet is a multi-award winning Australian owned travel agency, specialising in the best flight deals. Launching in 2010 as a family owned and operated agency, BYOjet quickly became one of Australia's leading online travel providers and expanded into New Zealand, Singap...

NAICS:561
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:13
Subsidiaries:51
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Hertz

Hertz

8501 Williams Road, Estero, 33928, US

Last Update: 19/09/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.hertz.com
701/1000Moderate

Hertz Global Holdings, Inc. is one of the world’s leading car rental and mobility solutions providers. Its subsidiaries, including The Hertz Corporation, and licensees operate the Hertz, Dollar, Thrifty, and Firefly vehicle rental brands, with more than 11,000 rental lo...

NAICS:5615
NAICS Definition:Travel Arrangement and Reservation Services
Employees:21,918
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
BYOjet

BYOjet

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Hertz

Hertz

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Travel Arrangements Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BYOjet in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Travel Arrangements Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hertz in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - BYOjet (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BYOjet cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Hertz (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hertz cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
BYOjet

BYOjet

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Hertz

Hertz

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
HER1765420281
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
HER047072425

FAQ

Between BYOjet company and Hertz company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between BYOjet company and Hertz company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between BYOjet company and Hertz company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between BYOjet company and Hertz company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between BYOjet company and Hertz company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between BYOjet company and Hertz company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between BYOjet company and Hertz company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between BYOjet company and Hertz company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between BYOjet company and Hertz company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between BYOjet company and Hertz company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between BYOjet company and Hertz company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between BYOjet and Hertz, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between BYOjet and Hertz, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - BYOjet or Hertz ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - BYOjet or Hertz ?
Between BYOjet and Hertz, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between BYOjet and Hertz, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-113705
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was determined in a2aproject a2a-rs up to 0.4.3. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file a2a-server/src/error.rs. Executing a manipulation can lead to information exposure through error message. The attack can be executed remotely. This patch is called 713b943af94ab2d521d483b841618b97a2e78a4d. A patch should be applied to remediate this issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-9825
SUMMARY

IBM Cyber Fraud 1.0.0 through 1.0.2 has a missing secure attribute allowing sensitive cookies to be transmitted over unencrypted connections, potentially enabling an attacker to intercept session data through network-based attacks.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-94402
SUMMARY

IBM Carbon Charts 0.4.0 through 1.27.19 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. The MeterChart component's Title.truncateTitle() function re-inserts a substring of user-supplied label text into the DOM via an unsanitized innerHTML write when the title exceeds the available container width. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the victim's browser session.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-93888
SUMMARY

IBM Sterling Connect Direct for Unix 6.4.0.0 through 6.4.0.6 and 6.3.0.0 through 6.3.0.7 apnotify utility is vulnerable to a code injection due to insufficient validation of user input.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-93744
SUMMARY

IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow an unathenticated remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper access control. By sending a specially crafted HTTP request to any URL within the Navigator application prior to authentication, a bad actor could exploit this vulnerability to alter server-side session security state.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9