Comparison Overview
Bupa Global

Bupa Global
Trafalgar Place, Brighton, BN1 4FY, GB
Last Update: 03/02/2026
Welcome to Bupa Global. As a leading international private healthcare company for individuals and businesses, we offer an extensive and inclusive range of benefits across our premium health plans, to support you at every stage of life. Our plans provide access to he...

Aflac
1932 Wynnton Rd, Columbus, 31999, US
Last Update: 06/08/2026
Over 50 Million people worldwide have chosen Aflac because of our commitment to providing customers with the confidence that comes from knowing they have assistance in being prepared for whatever life may bring. With Aflac, whether you're a large business or a small o...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Bupa Global







Aflac






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Bupa Global in 2026.
Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)
Aflac has 191.26% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Bupa Global (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Bupa Global cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Aflac (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Aflac cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Bupa Global

Aflac
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A maliciously crafted PDF file, when parsed through Autodesk Revit, can force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, cause data corruption, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.
A flaw was found in udisks2. A local attacker with an active console session can exploit insufficient authorization checking on the 'as-user' option in the org.freedesktop.UDisks2.Filesystem.Mount() D-Bus method. This allows the attacker to spoof the 'as-user' parameter, mounting filesystems on behalf of arbitrary users, including privileged accounts. This can lead to local privilege escalation through mount point injection and manipulation of the mount namespace visible to privileged users.
A maliciously crafted BMP file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force a Untrusted Pointer Dereference vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.
A maliciously crafted TIF file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products during image import, can cause an Out-of-Bounds Read in the image handling library. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a denial of service
PILOS (Platform for Interactive Live-Online Seminars) is a frontend for BigBlueButton. From 2.1.0 until 4.14.1, PILOS does not send a Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy response header, so pages opened by PILOS via a link that opens a new browsing context (e.g., target="_blank") retain a window.opener reference back to the originating PILOS tab. A malicious destination page reached this way can use window.opener to navigate or manipulate the original PILOS tab, a technique known as reverse tabnabbing, potentially redirecting an authenticated user to a phishing page that mimics PILOS. This issue is fixed in version 4.14.1.