Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Bulten Group » BUL1770194880

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (BUL1770194880)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-56
Company Score Before Incident743 / 1000
Company Score After Incident687 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERBUL1770194880
Type of Cyber IncidentCyber Attack
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDNA
INCIDENT DATE30/09/2025
STATUSpublished

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Bulten Group's Cyber Attack and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Bulten Group Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Bulten Group breach identified under incident ID BUL1770194880.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Bulten Group's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/bulten, the number of followers: 6692, the industry type: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing and the number of employees: 344 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 743 and after the incident was 687 with a difference of -56 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Bulten Group and their customers.

Bulten AB recently reported "Cyberattack on Major Customer Impacts Bulten AB's Financial Performance", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

Bulten AB, a global supplier of automotive fasteners, reported a significant downturn in its 2025 financial performance due to a cyberattack on a major customer, alongside anti-dumping duties and restructuring costs.

The disruption is felt across the environment, plus an estimated financial loss of SEK 5,045 million (13.1% decline in net sales).

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

The case underscores how teams are taking away lessons such as Vulnerabilities in supply chain stability due to dependency on large OEM customers.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Supply Chain Compromise (T1195) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including type such as Supply Chain Attack, and cyberattack on a major customer impacted Bulten AB. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Endpoint Denial of Service (T1499) with moderate to high confidence (70%), with evidence including disrupted supply chain stability, and 13.1% decline in net sales and Resource Hijacking (T1496) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating halved operating earnings due to cyberattack on customer. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Supply Chain Compromise (90%)
Impact
Endpoint Denial of Service (70%)
Resource Hijacking (60%)

Sources & References