What is Boston University Wheelock Educational Policy Center's cybersecurity risk score?

Boston University Wheelock Educational Policy Center has an AI-generated cybersecurity risk score of 753 out of 1000, indicating a Fair security posture according to Rankiteo's assessment.

How many security incidents has Boston University Wheelock Educational Policy Center experienced?

According to Rankiteo, Boston University Wheelock Educational Policy Center currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has Boston University Wheelock Educational Policy Center been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, Boston University Wheelock Educational Policy Center has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does Boston University Wheelock Educational Policy Center have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Boston University Wheelock Educational Policy Center does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does Boston University Wheelock Educational Policy Center have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Boston University Wheelock Educational Policy Center does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does Boston University Wheelock Educational Policy Center comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, Boston University Wheelock Educational Policy Center is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does Boston University Wheelock Educational Policy Center have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,Boston University Wheelock Educational Policy Center is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

How many employees does Boston University Wheelock Educational Policy Center have ?

Boston University Wheelock Educational Policy Center employs approximately 11 people worldwide.

Does Boston University Wheelock Educational Policy Center own any subsidiaries ?

Boston University Wheelock Educational Policy Center presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

How many LinkedIn followers does Boston University Wheelock Educational Policy Center have ?

Boston University Wheelock Educational Policy Center's official LinkedIn profile has approximately 491 followers.

Does Boston University Wheelock Educational Policy Center have a Crunchbase profile ?

No, Boston University Wheelock Educational Policy Center does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Does Boston University Wheelock Educational Policy Center have a LinkedIn profile ?

Yes, Boston University Wheelock Educational Policy Center maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/bu-wheelock-educational-policy-center.

How many peer or competitor companies does Boston University Wheelock Educational Policy Center have ?

Boston University Wheelock Educational Policy Center has an estimated 1,402 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop

WindowsmacOSLinux

Download

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Link verified badges to your company page to build trust with insurers and customers.

Apply now and get your badge!

Internal validation & live display

Insurers and partners see a safer profile

Faster underwriting decisions

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Proud contributor to the Society of Actuaries.

BUWEPC

Boost Score +25 with badge (5 left)

753

/1000

Fair

778

/1000

Fair

Boston University Wheelock Educational Policy Center Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

wheelockpolicycenter.org

Add Your Compliance Badge

The Wheelock Educational Policy Center (WEPC) at Boston University's Wheelock College of Education and Human Development conducts and disseminates rigorous, policy-relevant research in partnership with local, state, and federal policymakers and stakeholders to improve educational opportunities and holistic outcomes for traditionally marginalized students.

BUWEPC A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Scoring History

BUWEPC

Boston University Wheelock Educational Policy Center CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents

Attack Types

Entity

Type

Severity

Impact

Seen

Blog Details

Supply Chain Source

Incident Details

View

No data available

Loading…

A.I.

BUWEPC Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction

Incident Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction A

Prediction B

Prediction C

Prediction D

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

Loading…

Underwriter Stats for BUWEPC

Incidents vs Research Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Boston University Wheelock Educational Policy Center in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Boston University Wheelock Educational Policy Center in 2026.

Incident Types BUWEPC vs Research Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Boston University Wheelock Educational Policy Center in 2026.

Incident History - BUWEPC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loading…

SUBSIDIARY

Boston University Wheelock Educational Policy Center Subsidiaries

BUWEPC

Research

Website: https://wheelockpolicycenter.org/

Company Size: 11

Boston University Wheelock College of Education & Human DevelopmentHigher Education

Boston UniversityHigher Education

Boston University School of Public HealthHigher Education

Public Health PostInternet Publishing

Boston University College of CommunicationHigher Education

Communication Research Center at Boston UniversityResearch Services

Boston University School of Social WorkHigher Education

Boston University Metropolitan CollegeHigher Education

Boston University Office of ResearchHigher Education

Boston University Center for Brain RecoveryResearch Services

Boston University Information Services & TechnologyTechnology, Information and Internet

Boston University Graduate & Postdoctoral SuccessHigher Education

Boston University Industry EngagementHigher Education

Boston University Marsh Chapel & Religious LifeCivic and Social Organizations

Boston University Photonics CenterResearch

Boston University School of Hospitality AdministrationHigher Education

CARB-XBiotechnology Research

Center on Emerging Infectious Diseases (CEID)Research Services

Boston University ExpertsHigher Education

Boston University Neurophotonics CenterResearch Services

Master of Science in Statistical PracticeHigher Education

Boston University Software & Application Innovation LabResearch Services

Boston University Government & Community AffairsHigher Education

Master of Science in Public RelationsHigher Education

Boston University SustainabilityHigher Education

Innovate@BUHigher Education

Boston University Staff Advisory CouncilHigher Education

Boston University College of EngineeringHigher Education

Boston University Institute for Global SustainabilityHigher Education

Boston University LGBTQIA+ Center for Faculty & StaffHigher Education

Center for Antiracist ResearchResearch Services

Boston University Federal RelationsHigher Education

Loading…

Boston University Wheelock Educational Policy Center Similar Companies

Københavns Universitet - University of Copenhagen

ku.dk

PRIVACY POLICY at the University of Copenhagen: https://informationssikkerhed.ku.dk/english/protection-of-information-privacy/privacy-policy/ With over 40,000 students and more than 9,000 employees, the University of Copenhagen is the largest institution of research and education in Denmark. The purpose of the University – to quote the University Statute – is to ’conduct research and provide further education to the highest academic level’. Approximately one hundred different institutes, departments, laboratories, centres, museums, etc., form the nucleus of the University, where professors, lecturers and other academic staff, as well as most of the technical and administrative personnel, carry out their daily work, and where teaching takes place. These activities take place in various environments ranging from the plant world of the Botanical Gardens, through high-technology laboratories and auditoriums, to the historic buildings and lecture rooms of Frue Plads and other locations.

Aarhus University

au.dk

About Aarhus University Aarhus University is a leading international research university covering all scientific areas with a staff of 11.000 employees and 44.500 students, the majority are post-graduate students enrolled on Master’s and PhD programmes. Aarhus University is among the top 100 universities in the world. The aim of the university is to sustain and enhance a high standard in both research and education, which has placed it among the international elite. Aarhus University was established in 1928 as a small private initiative. It has since grown to become a leading public research university with international reach covering all academic fields and address basic, applied and strategic research as well as the research-based consultancy provided to public authorities and private business. One of Aarhus University’s focus areas is talent development. An activity considered so important that it is singled out as one of the four core activities in the Aarhus University strategy alongside excellent research, world-class education and inspiring research-based consultancy. Research at Aarhus University is both organised in traditional departments under the four faculties and in interdisciplinary research centres. In addition, Aarhus University researchers engage in research collaboration under the auspices of Knowledge Management Centres with external partners such as government organisations, private enterprises, NGOs and Aarhus University’s wide range of international partner universities.

Loading…

NEWS

Boston University Wheelock Educational Policy Center CyberSecurity News

Latest updates, reports, and threat intel affecting the global network.

January 30, 2025 08:00 AM

Are uncertified teachers still the answer?

Some researchers frown upon the practice, encouraging states and districts to pursue alternative strategies for addressing teacher shortages.

Read Article

July 30, 2024 07:00 AM

Maryland BOE Not On Same Page About Literacy Policy To Hold Back Third Graders

Some members balked Tuesday as the Maryland State Board of Education reviewed a proposed literacy policy that could lead to third grade...

Read Article

July 08, 2024 07:00 AM

Meet BU’s Newest Associate Professors | BU Today

A list of the 32 faculty members on Boston University's Charles River Campus promoted in 2024 to the rank of associate professor.

Read Article

October 18, 2023 07:00 AM

Implications of Generative AI (ChatGPT) in Education

By Chloe Wojtanik, Hariri Institute for Computing. Over the past year, ChatGPT has become a topic of hot debate, especially in the classroom...

Read Article

Loading…

CVE

Latest

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-18556

SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel vulnerability in N-able N-central allows Authentication Bypass. This issue affects N-central: through 2026.1.

Published

Date2026-08-01

Updated

Date2026-08-01

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 8.2

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

https://uptime.n-able.com/

CVE-2026-55735

SUMMARY

Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature in ueberauth guardian allows an unauthenticated attacker to revoke a victim's session with a forged token. Guardian.revoke/3 in lib/guardian.ex decodes the supplied token with peek/1, which performs no signature verification (it only base64-decodes the JWT header and payload). The resulting unverified claims are forwarded directly to the configured token module's revoke callback and the implementation's on_revoke callback, a state-mutating sink. The sibling operations refresh/2 and exchange/4 both call decode_and_verify first, so the signature is checked before anything acts on the claims; revoke/3 is the only state-mutating path that acts on claims without verifying the signature. An attacker who knows or guesses a victim's identifying claim values (jti, sub) can forge a JWT carrying those claims, sign it with an arbitrary key, and submit it to any endpoint that funnels a caller-supplied token into Guardian.revoke/3 (the standard logout / session-revocation pattern). When the token module mutates state keyed by the claims (whitelist deletion or blacklist insertion, for example a GuardianDb-style store), the victim's legitimate session is evicted. This is an unauthenticated session-revocation denial of service; the attacker never needs the signing secret. This issue affects guardian: from 1.0.0 before 2.4.1.

Published

Date2026-08-01

Updated

Date2026-08-01

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 8.2

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-55734

SUMMARY

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling vulnerability in ueberauth guardian (Guardian.Permissions module) allows a denial of service via BEAM atom-table exhaustion. This vulnerability is associated with program file lib/guardian/permissions.ex and program routines 'Elixir.Guardian.Permissions':encode_permissions!/1, 'Elixir.Guardian.Permissions':encode_permissions_into_claims!/2, 'Elixir.Guardian.Permissions':do_encode_permissions!/2. The Guardian.Permissions mixin installs a public encode_permissions!/1 function on every module that does use Guardian.Permissions. For each key of the supplied map, encode_permissions!/1 calls String.to_atom(to_string(k)) before any validation runs. The integer-value clause of do_encode_permissions!/2 then short-circuits straight to encoding without validating the key against the configured permission set, so a key with an integer value is interned as a fresh atom with no exception raised. Atoms are never garbage collected and the BEAM atom table is a fixed-size resource (default roughly 1,048,576 entries), so each unique attacker-chosen key permanently consumes one slot. An attacker who can influence a permission map that reaches encode_permissions!/1 (for example a permissions map read from a request body and passed into token issuance via encode_permissions_into_claims!/2) can mint an unbounded number of atoms and exhaust the atom table, crashing the entire BEAM node and every service running on it. The sibling decode_permissions/1 is not affected because it skips keys absent from the configured permission set. This issue affects guardian: from 2.0.0 before 2.4.1.

Published

Date2026-08-01

Updated

Date2026-08-01

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 6.9

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-55733

SUMMARY

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling in ueberauth guardian allows denial of service via unbounded atom creation from attacker-controlled binary input. Guardian.Permissions.AtomEncoding encodes permission scopes by passing arbitrary binaries to String.to_atom/1. When encode/3 in lib/guardian/permissions/atom_encoding.ex is called with a list, each binary entry is handled by the encode_value/3 binary clause, which calls String.to_atom(value) with no allow-list check. The perm_set argument (the application's small, finite set of legitimate permission names) is discarded, so any external string flows straight into atom creation. This encoder is selected with use Guardian.Permissions, encoding: Guardian.Permissions.AtomEncoding and reached through the imported encode/3 entry point. String.to_atom/1 creates a brand-new atom for every previously unseen binary, atoms are never garbage collected, and the BEAM atom table is fixed at roughly 1,048,576 entries by default. An application that funnels attacker-influenced permission scopes (from a request body, a JWT claim, or other external input) into encode/3 therefore mints one permanent atom per distinct value. A modest stream of varied, unauthenticated input permanently consumes the atom table and crashes the BEAM node with system_limit, taking down every application running on it. The default encoder is Guardian.Permissions.BitwiseEncoding, which is not affected. This issue affects guardian: from 2.0.0 before 2.4.1.

Published

Date2026-08-01

Updated

Date2026-08-01

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 6.9

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-54894

SUMMARY

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling in ueberauth guardian allows denial of service via unbounded atom creation from attacker-influenced binary input. Guardian.Plug.Keys derives connection and session namespace keys by passing arbitrary binaries to String.to_atom/1. base_key/1 in lib/guardian/plug/keys.ex converts any binary into the atom :"guardian_<input>", and the derived helpers claims_key/1, resource_key/1, and token_key/1 create a second atom on top of that. key_from_other/1 likewise converts a regex-captured binary through String.to_atom/1. The public specs advertise String.t() as a valid argument, so passing a string is documented usage, and higher-level entry points such as Guardian.Plug.current_token(conn, key: key) thread the caller-supplied key straight into these functions. String.to_atom/1 creates a brand-new atom for every previously unseen binary, atoms are never garbage collected, and the BEAM atom table is fixed at roughly 1,048,576 entries by default. An application that routes attacker-influenced data (a tenant identifier, header, or other request input) into a Guardian key therefore mints one permanent atom per distinct value. A modest stream of varied, unauthenticated input permanently consumes the atom table and crashes the BEAM node, taking down every application running on it. This issue affects guardian: from 0.1.0 before 2.4.1.

Published

Date2026-08-01

Updated

Date2026-08-01

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 6.9

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

Loading…

API

Access Data Using Our API

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?
linkedin_id=axa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

Try It API Documentation Rapid

MEASURE

What Do We Measure ?

Incident

Finding

Grade

Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network SecurityIdentify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat IntelligenceLeverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Rankiteo

By Rankiteo

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

View on G2.com

Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.

View latest plans →View all security reports →

MILESTONEG

Users
Love Us

Loading…