Comparison Overview
British Airways
British Airways
Harmondsworth, Middlesex, UB7 0GA, GB
Last Update: 13/09/2026
As a global airline and the UK’s flag carrier, British Airways has been flying its customers to where they need to be for more than 100 years. The airline connects Britain with the world and the world with Britain, operating one of the most extensive international sched...
American Airlines
Dallas-Fort Worth, US
Last Update: 04/10/2026
Embark on an adventure with a commitment to service, excellence and humanity. Our team is what powers our airline. We are proudly dedicated to our purpose of caring for people on life’s journey, including connecting our customers to the people and places they love or pr...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
British Airways
American Airlines
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)
British Airways has 51.92% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)
American Airlines has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - British Airways (X = Date, Y = Severity)
British Airways cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - American Airlines (X = Date, Y = Severity)
American Airlines cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
British Airways
American Airlines
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.