Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Brandt Holdings Agriculture » BRA1773894569

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (BRA1773894569)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-57
Company Score Before Incident758 / 1000
Company Score After Incident701 / 1000
Company LinkView Brandt Holdings Agriculture Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERBRA1773894569
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDPersonally identifiable information (PII), including...
INCIDENT DATE07/11/2025
STATUSCompleted (initial investigation)

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Brandt Holdings Agriculture's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Brandt Holdings Agriculture Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Brandt Holdings Agriculture breach identified under incident ID BRA1773894569.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Brandt Holdings Agriculture's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/brandt-holdings, the number of followers: 749, the industry type: Farming and the number of employees: 315 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 758 and after the incident was 701 with a difference of -57 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Brandt Holdings Agriculture and their customers.

On 17 March 2026, Brandt Equities LP disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Brandt Equities LP Data Breach Exposes Sensitive Information of New Hampshire Residents".

In November 2025, Brandt Equities LP detected unusual activity within its network, prompting an investigation by a cybersecurity firm.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Personally identifiable information (PII), including names, Social Security numbers, and driver’s license numbers, with nearly 2 records at risk.

In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Notification via mail to affected individuals.

The case underscores how Completed (initial investigation), with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Free credit monitoring, identity theft protection, and up to $1 million in insurance offered to impacted parties.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access during two separate periods November 8–12 and November 20–22 and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating unusual activity within its network detected. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating attackers copied sensitive files containing PII. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating exposed data included names, Social Security numbers, and driver’s license numbers. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating attackers copied sensitive files during unauthorized access and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating data breach exposed PII of two New Hampshire residents. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access and copying of sensitive files and Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating potential identity theft risk due to exposed PII. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Valid Accounts (70%)
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Credential Access
Unsecured Credentials (60%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Transfer Data to Cloud Account (50%)
Impact
Data Destruction (30%)
Stored Data Manipulation (40%)

Sources & References