Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Bouygues Telecom ProBouygues Telecom Pro
VS
Cox CommunicationsCox Communications
Bouygues Telecom Pro

Bouygues Telecom Pro

13, Avenue du Maréchal Juin, Meudon, 92360, FR

Last Update: 20/04/2026

View Profile
752/1000Fair

Nos experts accompagnent les pros, TPE et PME et facilitent la vie des professionnels en concevant des offres simples et packagées pour communiquer efficacement et sécuriser leurs activités. Acteur majeur de la démocratisation de la Fibre Entreprise en France et précur...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:64
Subsidiaries:90
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Cox Communications

Cox Communications

6205 Peachtree Dunwoody Road, Atlanta, 30328, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.cox.com
754/1000Fair

Cox Communications is committed to creating more moments of real human connection. We bring people closer to family and friends through technology that’s inspired by a culture that puts people first, and we’re always working to improve life in the communities we serve. ...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:16,319
Subsidiaries:23
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Bouygues Telecom Pro

Bouygues Telecom Pro

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Cox Communications

Cox Communications

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bouygues Telecom Pro in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cox Communications in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Bouygues Telecom Pro (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bouygues Telecom Pro cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Cox Communications (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cox Communications cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Bouygues Telecom Pro

Bouygues Telecom Pro

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Cox Communications

Cox Communications

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
COX2035161122
🔒 Incident : Breach
COX152930322

FAQ

Between Bouygues Telecom Pro company and Cox Communications company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Bouygues Telecom Pro company and Cox Communications company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Bouygues Telecom Pro company and Cox Communications company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Bouygues Telecom Pro company and Cox Communications company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Bouygues Telecom Pro company and Cox Communications company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Bouygues Telecom Pro company and Cox Communications company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Bouygues Telecom Pro company and Cox Communications company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Bouygues Telecom Pro company and Cox Communications company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Bouygues Telecom Pro company and Cox Communications company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Bouygues Telecom Pro company and Cox Communications company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Bouygues Telecom Pro company and Cox Communications company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Bouygues Telecom Pro and Cox Communications, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Bouygues Telecom Pro and Cox Communications, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Bouygues Telecom Pro or Cox Communications ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Bouygues Telecom Pro or Cox Communications ?
Between Bouygues Telecom Pro and Cox Communications, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Bouygues Telecom Pro and Cox Communications, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-93892
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-93891
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-92832
SUMMARY

IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-85457
SUMMARY

IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-84418
SUMMARY

IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2