Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Booz Allen Hamilton » BOO1774470789

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (BOO1774470789)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-58
Company Score Before Incident712 / 1000
Company Score After Incident654 / 1000
Company LinkView Booz Allen Hamilton Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERBOO1774470789
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDTax returns and confidential tax...
INCIDENT DATE24/03/2026
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Booz Allen Hamilton's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Booz Allen Hamilton Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Booz Allen Hamilton breach identified under incident ID BOO1774470789.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Booz Allen Hamilton's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/booz-allen-hamilton, the number of followers: 787790, the industry type: IT Services and IT Consulting and the number of employees: 37369 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 712 and after the incident was 654 with a difference of -58 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Booz Allen Hamilton and their customers.

On 25 March 2026, Booz Allen Hamilton disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Sen. Rick Scott Sues Booz Allen Hamilton Over Massive Tax Data Breach".

Florida Senator Rick Scott filed a lawsuit against federal contractor Booz Allen Hamilton and a former employee, alleging the unauthorized leak of his tax returns and confidential tax records belonging to President Donald Trump and other high-net-worth individuals.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Tax returns and confidential tax records.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

The case underscores how Ongoing.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including former Employee, and handling classified information. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (T1552.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating tax returns and confidential tax records compromised. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating tax returns and confidential tax records exposed. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized leak of sensitive financial data and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating details of how the data was accessed or disseminated remain under investigation. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating security lapses at government-contracted firms and Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized leak of tax returns and confidential records. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating former Employee with access to classified information. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Valid Accounts (90%)
Credential Access
Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (70%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (60%)
Exfiltration Over Web Service (50%)
Impact
Data Destruction (30%)
Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (40%)
Defense Evasion
Valid Accounts (80%)

Sources & References