Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (BOL1791311909)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of Bolt Digital Agency's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts Bolt Digital Agency Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Bolt Digital Agency breach identified under incident ID BOL1791311909.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Bolt Digital Agency's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/bolt-web-solutions, the number of followers: 202, the industry type: Advertising Services and the number of employees: 3 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 749 and after the incident was 686 with a difference of -63 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Bolt Digital Agency and their customers.
On 25 September 2026, Bolt Web Solutions disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Bolt Web Solutions Data Breach".
Shamis & Gentile P.A.
The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Personally identifiable information (PII), including email addresses, phone numbers, full names, dates of birth, Social Security numbers, and financial account numbers.
In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Notification letters sent to affected individuals.
The case underscores how Ongoing, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Affected individuals notified via letter.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating salesforce consulting firm; no public details on breach cause and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating aI-powered automation and Salesforce optimization services. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating pII compromised such as SSNs, financial account numbers, DOBs and OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating high sensitivity of data suggests possible credential dumping. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating email, phone, names, DOBs, SSNs, financial accounts exposed and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating salesforce consulting firm; likely accessed client data repositories. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating pII breach disclosed; data likely exfiltrated to external systems and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating aI-powered automation may involve cloud data transfers. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating no details on malware or data destruction; breach disclosed and Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data Manipulation (T1565.002) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating high identity theft risk; potential data manipulation. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- Bolt Digital Agency Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/bolt-web-solutions/incident/BOL1791311909
- Bolt Digital Agency CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/bolt-web-solutions
- Bolt Digital Agency Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/bol1791311909-bolt-web-solutions-breach-september-2026/
- Bolt Digital Agency CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/bolt-web-solutions/history
- Bolt Digital Agency CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://www.claimdepot.com/investigations/bolt-data-breach-2026
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf