Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (BOL1776825169)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of Bolt's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts Bolt Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Bolt breach identified under incident ID BOL1776825169.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Bolt's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/bolt-eu, the number of followers: 314219, the industry type: Software Development and the number of employees: 14599 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 782 and after the incident was 711 with a difference of -71 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Bolt and their customers.
Bol recently reported "Bol Online Store Alleged Data Breach Affecting 400,000 Belgian Users", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.
A hacker operating under the alias 'Jeffrey Epstein' claims to have compromised the personal data of over 400,000 Belgian users of Bol, a major Dutch online retailer with operations in Belgium.
The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Personal data of 400,000 Belgian users, with nearly 400,000 records at risk.
In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Denial of breach, no evidence of hack or attack.
The case underscores how Unconfirmed by Bol.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (60%), with evidence including major Dutch online retailer with operations in Belgium, and no evidence of a hack or attack (denial) and Trusted Relationship (T1199) with moderate confidence (50%), with evidence including 44,200+ sales partners, and potential supply chain compromise. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Modify Authentication Process (T1556) with lower confidence (40%), with evidence including payment data and order histories exposed, and no ransomware involved and Brute Force (T1110) with lower confidence (30%), with evidence including 400,000 records allegedly stolen, and no details on attack vector. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating full names, birthdates, phone numbers, email addresses, physical addresses and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating payment data, order histories, shipping details compromised. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), with evidence including data offered for sale via Telegram/Session, and 400,000 records allegedly stolen and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating hacker provided downloadable sample to verify dataset. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), with evidence including no evidence of hack or attack (denial), and potential reputational damage and Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with lower confidence (40%), with evidence including highly sensitive data exposed, and identity theft risk labeled as high. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- Bolt Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/bolt-eu/incident/BOL1776825169
- Bolt CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/bolt-eu
- Bolt Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/bol1776825169-bol-breach-april-2026/
- Bolt CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/bolt-eu/history
- Bolt CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://www.scworld.com/brief/over-400k-records-allegedly-stolen-from-major-dutch-webshop-bol-data-leaked
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf