What is the official website of Blue Systems ?

The official website of Blue Systems is http://bluesystems.io.

What is Blue Systems's cybersecurity risk score?

Blue Systems has an AI-generated cybersecurity risk score of 753 out of 1000, indicating a Fair security posture according to Rankiteo's assessment.

How many security incidents has Blue Systems experienced?

According to Rankiteo, Blue Systems currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has Blue Systems been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, Blue Systems has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does Blue Systems have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Blue Systems is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does Blue Systems have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Blue Systems does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does Blue Systems comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, Blue Systems is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does Blue Systems have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Blue Systems does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does Blue Systems comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, Blue Systems is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does Blue Systems have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,Blue Systems is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Which industry does Blue Systems operate in ?

Blue Systems operates primarily in the Data Infrastructure and Analytics industry.

How many employees does Blue Systems have ?

Blue Systems employs approximately 17 people worldwide.

Does Blue Systems own any subsidiaries ?

Blue Systems presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

How many LinkedIn followers does Blue Systems have ?

Blue Systems's official LinkedIn profile has approximately 1,112 followers.

What is the NAICS classification code for Blue Systems ?

Blue Systems is classified under the NAICS code 518, which corresponds to Data Processing, Hosting and Related Services.

Does Blue Systems have a Crunchbase profile ?

No, Blue Systems does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Does Blue Systems have a LinkedIn profile ?

Yes, Blue Systems maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/bluesystems.

How many cybersecurity incidents has Blue Systems experienced ?

As of August 2, 2026, Rankiteo reports that Blue Systems has not experienced any cybersecurity incidents.

How many peer or competitor companies does Blue Systems have ?

Blue Systems has an estimated 388 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop

WindowsmacOSLinux

Download

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Link verified badges to your company page to build trust with insurers and customers.

Apply now and get your badge!

Internal validation & live display

Insurers and partners see a safer profile

Faster underwriting decisions

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Proud contributor to the Society of Actuaries.

Blue Systems

Boost Score +25 with badge (5 left)

753

/1000

Fair

778

/1000

Fair

Blue Systems Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

bluesystems.io

Add Your Compliance Badge

Blue Systems was established several years ago as a tech startup within the giant Bolloré Group. For decades, the Group has been a prominent market player in electric shared mobility, clean tech and digital solutions optimizing the flow of people, materials and data. Building upon synergies among several entities within the Group, Blue Systems was established to provide state-of-the-art smart mobility and smart city software solutions to cities and private companies across the globe. Despite being part of a very large holding, we keep our highly entrepreneurial DNA and our independence from the Bolloré Group. Our mission is to offer innovative and adaptable data processing solutions to cities facing a host of daily challenges in the field

Blue Systems A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Scoring History

Blue Systems

Blue Systems CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents

Attack Types

Entity

Type

Severity

Impact

Seen

Blog Details

Supply Chain Source

Incident Details

View

No data available

Loading…

A.I.

Blue Systems Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction

Incident Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction A

Prediction B

Prediction C

Prediction D

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

Loading…

Underwriter Stats for Blue Systems

Incidents vs Data Infrastructure and Analytics Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Blue Systems in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Blue Systems in 2026.

Incident Types Blue Systems vs Data Infrastructure and Analytics Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Blue Systems in 2026.

Incident History - Blue Systems (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loading…

SUBSIDIARY

Blue Systems Subsidiaries

Blue Systems

Data Infrastructure and Analytics

Website: http://bluesystems.io

Company Size: 11-50 employees

BolloréHolding Companies

Loading…

Blue Systems Similar Companies

Loading…

NEWS

Blue Systems CyberSecurity News

Latest updates, reports, and threat intel affecting the global network.

March 18, 2026 03:25 PM

Stryker begins restoring ordering, shipping systems after cyberattack

The medtech company believes the cyberattack has been contained and is now bringing systems back online.

Read Article

March 13, 2026 07:00 AM

Stryker’s manufacturing, shipping disrupted after cyberattack

The medtech company, which identified the attack on Wednesday, revealed in an update that its order processing, manufacturing and shipping...

Read Article

February 26, 2026 08:00 AM

Trends In Healthcare Data Breach Statistics

Our healthcare data breach statistics clearly show an upward trend in data breaches since 2009, when OCR first started publishing data...

Read Article

February 13, 2026 08:00 AM

Texas Attorney General Investigates 25M+ Conduent Business Services Data Breach

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has announced that his office has launched an investigation into the data breach at Conduent Business...

Read Article

December 16, 2025 08:00 AM

Red Cat Selects SpiderOak to Conduct Blue UAS Cybersecurity Assessment for Black Widow™ Platform

Services strengthen cyber resilience for Army's Short-Range Reconnaissance (SRR) program and future unmanned systems across all domains.

Read Article

November 21, 2025 08:00 AM

This Hacker Conference Installed a Literal Antivirus Monitoring System

At New Zealand's Kawaiicon cybersecurity convention, organizers hacked together a way for attendees to track CO2 levels throughout the...

Read Article

November 19, 2025 08:00 AM

6 Cybersecurity Stocks to Buy Now

With a boost in global security spending expected this year, these cybersecurity stocks are worth a closer look.

Read Article

November 18, 2025 08:00 AM

ADF weapons programs exposed in defence industry cyber attacks

Information relating to Australian military programs has been compromised in cyber attacks on defence industry contractors,...

Read Article

October 17, 2025 07:00 AM

Windows Rust Kernel GDI Vulnerability Leads to Crash and Blue Screen of Death Error

A vulnerability in Microsoft's newly implemented Rust-based kernel component for the Graphics Device Interface (GDI) in Windows.

Read Article

Loading…

CVE

Latest

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-18556

SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel vulnerability in N-able N-central allows Authentication Bypass. This issue affects N-central: through 2026.1.

Published

Date2026-08-01

Updated

Date2026-08-01

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 8.2

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

https://uptime.n-able.com/

CVE-2026-55735

SUMMARY

Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature in ueberauth guardian allows an unauthenticated attacker to revoke a victim's session with a forged token. Guardian.revoke/3 in lib/guardian.ex decodes the supplied token with peek/1, which performs no signature verification (it only base64-decodes the JWT header and payload). The resulting unverified claims are forwarded directly to the configured token module's revoke callback and the implementation's on_revoke callback, a state-mutating sink. The sibling operations refresh/2 and exchange/4 both call decode_and_verify first, so the signature is checked before anything acts on the claims; revoke/3 is the only state-mutating path that acts on claims without verifying the signature. An attacker who knows or guesses a victim's identifying claim values (jti, sub) can forge a JWT carrying those claims, sign it with an arbitrary key, and submit it to any endpoint that funnels a caller-supplied token into Guardian.revoke/3 (the standard logout / session-revocation pattern). When the token module mutates state keyed by the claims (whitelist deletion or blacklist insertion, for example a GuardianDb-style store), the victim's legitimate session is evicted. This is an unauthenticated session-revocation denial of service; the attacker never needs the signing secret. This issue affects guardian: from 1.0.0 before 2.4.1.

Published

Date2026-08-01

Updated

Date2026-08-01

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 8.2

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-55734

SUMMARY

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling vulnerability in ueberauth guardian (Guardian.Permissions module) allows a denial of service via BEAM atom-table exhaustion. This vulnerability is associated with program file lib/guardian/permissions.ex and program routines 'Elixir.Guardian.Permissions':encode_permissions!/1, 'Elixir.Guardian.Permissions':encode_permissions_into_claims!/2, 'Elixir.Guardian.Permissions':do_encode_permissions!/2. The Guardian.Permissions mixin installs a public encode_permissions!/1 function on every module that does use Guardian.Permissions. For each key of the supplied map, encode_permissions!/1 calls String.to_atom(to_string(k)) before any validation runs. The integer-value clause of do_encode_permissions!/2 then short-circuits straight to encoding without validating the key against the configured permission set, so a key with an integer value is interned as a fresh atom with no exception raised. Atoms are never garbage collected and the BEAM atom table is a fixed-size resource (default roughly 1,048,576 entries), so each unique attacker-chosen key permanently consumes one slot. An attacker who can influence a permission map that reaches encode_permissions!/1 (for example a permissions map read from a request body and passed into token issuance via encode_permissions_into_claims!/2) can mint an unbounded number of atoms and exhaust the atom table, crashing the entire BEAM node and every service running on it. The sibling decode_permissions/1 is not affected because it skips keys absent from the configured permission set. This issue affects guardian: from 2.0.0 before 2.4.1.

Published

Date2026-08-01

Updated

Date2026-08-01

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 6.9

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-55733

SUMMARY

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling in ueberauth guardian allows denial of service via unbounded atom creation from attacker-controlled binary input. Guardian.Permissions.AtomEncoding encodes permission scopes by passing arbitrary binaries to String.to_atom/1. When encode/3 in lib/guardian/permissions/atom_encoding.ex is called with a list, each binary entry is handled by the encode_value/3 binary clause, which calls String.to_atom(value) with no allow-list check. The perm_set argument (the application's small, finite set of legitimate permission names) is discarded, so any external string flows straight into atom creation. This encoder is selected with use Guardian.Permissions, encoding: Guardian.Permissions.AtomEncoding and reached through the imported encode/3 entry point. String.to_atom/1 creates a brand-new atom for every previously unseen binary, atoms are never garbage collected, and the BEAM atom table is fixed at roughly 1,048,576 entries by default. An application that funnels attacker-influenced permission scopes (from a request body, a JWT claim, or other external input) into encode/3 therefore mints one permanent atom per distinct value. A modest stream of varied, unauthenticated input permanently consumes the atom table and crashes the BEAM node with system_limit, taking down every application running on it. The default encoder is Guardian.Permissions.BitwiseEncoding, which is not affected. This issue affects guardian: from 2.0.0 before 2.4.1.

Published

Date2026-08-01

Updated

Date2026-08-01

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 6.9

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-54894

SUMMARY

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling in ueberauth guardian allows denial of service via unbounded atom creation from attacker-influenced binary input. Guardian.Plug.Keys derives connection and session namespace keys by passing arbitrary binaries to String.to_atom/1. base_key/1 in lib/guardian/plug/keys.ex converts any binary into the atom :"guardian_<input>", and the derived helpers claims_key/1, resource_key/1, and token_key/1 create a second atom on top of that. key_from_other/1 likewise converts a regex-captured binary through String.to_atom/1. The public specs advertise String.t() as a valid argument, so passing a string is documented usage, and higher-level entry points such as Guardian.Plug.current_token(conn, key: key) thread the caller-supplied key straight into these functions. String.to_atom/1 creates a brand-new atom for every previously unseen binary, atoms are never garbage collected, and the BEAM atom table is fixed at roughly 1,048,576 entries by default. An application that routes attacker-influenced data (a tenant identifier, header, or other request input) into a Guardian key therefore mints one permanent atom per distinct value. A modest stream of varied, unauthenticated input permanently consumes the atom table and crashes the BEAM node, taking down every application running on it. This issue affects guardian: from 0.1.0 before 2.4.1.

Published

Date2026-08-01

Updated

Date2026-08-01

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 6.9

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

Loading…

API

Access Data Using Our API

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?
linkedin_id=axa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

Try It API Documentation Rapid

MEASURE

What Do We Measure ?

Incident

Finding

Grade

Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network SecurityIdentify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat IntelligenceLeverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Rankiteo

By Rankiteo

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

View on G2.com

Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.

View latest plans →View all security reports →

MILESTONEG

Users
Love Us

Loading…