Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Blaze Credit Union » MARBLA1767622189

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (MARBLA1767622189)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-92
Company Score Before Incident756 / 1000
Company Score After Incident664 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERMARBLA1767622189
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORThird-Party Vendor Compromise
DATA EXPOSEDPersonal information of members
INCIDENT DATE30/11/2025
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Blaze Credit Union's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Blaze Credit Union Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Blaze Credit Union breach identified under incident ID MARBLA1767622189.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Blaze Credit Union's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/blazecreditunion, the number of followers: 5809, the industry type: Banking and the number of employees: 526 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 756 and after the incident was 664 with a difference of -92 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Blaze Credit Union and their customers.

Blaze Credit Union recently reported "Blaze Credit Union Data Breach via Third-Party Vendor", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

A data breach at Marquis Software Solutions, a third-party vendor providing services to financial institutions, has potentially exposed personal information of more than 235,000 Blaze Credit Union members.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Personal information of members, with nearly 235,000 records at risk.

In response, and began remediation that includes Complimentary credit monitoring and identity protection services for affected members, and stakeholders are being briefed through Notifying affected members via mailed letters in early December; urging members to monitor accounts and credit reports.

The case underscores how Ongoing, and recommending next steps like Members should monitor accounts for suspicious activity, watch for phishing attempts, and review credit reports regularly for unauthorized accounts, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Members notified via letters; urged to monitor accounts and credit reports.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Supply Chain Compromise (T1195) with high confidence (95%), with evidence including third-Party Vendor Compromise as attack_vector, and marquis Software Solutions, a third-party vendor. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Steal Application Access Token (T1528) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating personal information of members compromised via third-party vendor. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating potentially exposed personal information of over 235,000 members and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating third-party vendor (Marquis) handling sensitive financial data. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating high identity theft risk noted in impact assessment and Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with lower confidence (20%), supported by evidence indicating no evidence of ransomware, but data encryption field is null. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Supply Chain Compromise (95%)
Credential Access
Steal Application Access Token (70%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (60%)
Transfer Data to Cloud Account (50%)
Impact
Data Destruction (30%)
Data Encrypted for Impact (20%)

Sources & References