Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (BLA1767662450)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of Blaze Credit Union's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts Blaze Credit Union Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Blaze Credit Union breach identified under incident ID BLA1767662450.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Blaze Credit Union's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/blazecreditunion, the number of followers: 5809, the industry type: Banking and the number of employees: 526 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 666 and after the incident was 574 with a difference of -92 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Blaze Credit Union and their customers.
On 05 January 2026, Blaze Credit Union disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Blaze Credit Union Data Breach".
An unauthorized person gained access to Blaze Credit Union’s network and may have acquired records containing personally identifiable information (PII) of potentially hundreds of thousands of individuals.
The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Personally identifiable information (PII), with nearly Hundreds of thousands records at risk.
Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.
The case underscores how Ongoing (Lynch Carpenter, LLP investigation), with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Individuals impacted may be entitled to compensation; advised to contact Lynch Carpenter, LLP.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized actor gained access to Blaze’s network and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating no details on breach origin; financial sector vulnerabilities. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating pII exposed (SSNs, names, addresses); implies credential theft risk. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating records containing PII may have been acquired by unauthorized actor and Automated Exfiltration (T1020) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating hundreds of thousands of records exposed; likely automated. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating no ransomware details; data encryption not confirmed and Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating pII exposure heightens identity theft risk. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- Blaze Credit Union Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/blazecreditunion/incident/BLA1767662450
- Blaze Credit Union CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/blazecreditunion
- Blaze Credit Union Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/bla1767662450-breach-january-2026/
- Blaze Credit Union CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/blazecreditunion/history
- Blaze Credit Union CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2026/01/05/3213042/0/en/Blaze-Credit-Union-Data-Breach-Claims-Investigated-by-Lynch-Carpenter.html
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf