Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Black Kite » FORBLA1772542192

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (FORBLA1772542192)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-18
Company Score Before Incident752 / 1000
Company Score After Incident734 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERFORBLA1772542192
Type of Cyber IncidentCyber Attack
ATTACK VECTORThird-party vendors, shared platforms, centralized services
DATA EXPOSEDCorporate credentials, sensitive data
INCIDENT DATE31/12/2024
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Black Kite's Cyber Attack and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Black Kite Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Black Kite breach identified under incident ID FORBLA1772542192.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Black Kite's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/blackkite, the number of followers: 14287, the industry type: Computer and Network Security and the number of employees: 163 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 752 and after the incident was 734 with a difference of -18 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Black Kite and their customers.

719 officially named companies recently reported "Supply Chain Attacks Surge in 2025, Exposing Thousands of Unnamed Victims", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

A new report from cyber risk management firm Black Kite reveals a sharp escalation in supply chain attacks, with 136 major incidents in 2025 affecting 719 officially named companies and an estimated 26,000 additional unnamed victims.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Shared platforms, centralized services, high-dependency vendors, and exposing Corporate credentials, sensitive data.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

The case underscores how Ongoing, teams are taking away lessons such as Traditional third-party risk management is insufficient. Organizations must adopt active intelligence and systematic awareness to track risk propagation. The 'silent window' between detection and disclosure leaves downstream customers vulnerable, and recommending next steps like Enhance monitoring of third-party vendors, prioritize patch management, adopt systematic risk tracking, and reduce the disclosure delay for breaches.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Supply Chain Compromise (T1195) with high confidence (95%), with evidence including supply Chain Attacks Surge in 2025, and target shared platforms, centralized services, and high-dependency vendors, Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Supply Chain (T1195.002) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating 136 major incidents in 2025 affecting 719 named companies and 26,000 unnamed victims, and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (85%), supported by evidence indicating 23.34% have corporate credentials circulating on the dark web. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Gather Victim Identity Information: Credentials (T1589.001) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating 23.34% of monitored organizations have corporate credentials on the dark web and Credentials from Password Stores (T1555) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating corporate credentials, sensitive data compromised via third-party breaches. Under the Lateral Movement tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation of Remote Services (T1210) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating shared platforms, centralized services, and high-dependency vendors targeted and Remote Services: SMB/Windows Admin Shares (T1021.002) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating average of 5.28 downstream victims per third-party breach. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (85%), supported by evidence indicating sensitive data compromised via internal systems of third-party vendors and Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (75%), supported by evidence indicating data breach affecting thousands of unnamed victims. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating 26,000 unnamed victims affected by supply chain attacks and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating threat actors maximize disruption via shared platforms. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Resource Hijacking (T1496) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating high disruption to downstream victims via third-party breaches and Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating manufacturing and professional services face high ransomware susceptibility. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts: Cloud Accounts (T1078.004) with moderate to high confidence (75%), supported by evidence indicating corporate credentials circulating on the dark web (23.34%) and Hijack Execution Flow: DLL Side-Loading (T1574.002) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating supply chain attacks via compromised software dependencies. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Supply Chain Compromise (95%)
Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Supply Chain (90%)
Valid Accounts (85%)
Credential Access
Gather Victim Identity Information: Credentials (80%)
Credentials from Password Stores (70%)
Lateral Movement
Exploitation of Remote Services (80%)
Remote Services: SMB/Windows Admin Shares (70%)
Collection
Data from Information Repositories (85%)
Data from Local System (75%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (80%)
Transfer Data to Cloud Account (60%)
Impact
Resource Hijacking (70%)
Data Encrypted for Impact (50%)
Defense Evasion
Valid Accounts: Cloud Accounts (75%)
Hijack Execution Flow: DLL Side-Loading (60%)