What is the official website of BioWorks ?

The official website of BioWorks is http://www.bioworksinc.com.

What is BioWorks's cybersecurity risk score?

BioWorks has an AI-generated cybersecurity risk score of 731 out of 1000, indicating a Moderate security posture according to Rankiteo's assessment.

How many security incidents has BioWorks experienced?

According to Rankiteo, BioWorks currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has BioWorks been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, BioWorks has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does BioWorks have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, BioWorks is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does BioWorks have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, BioWorks does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does BioWorks comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, BioWorks is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does BioWorks have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, BioWorks does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does BioWorks comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, BioWorks is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does BioWorks have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,BioWorks is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Which industry does BioWorks operate in ?

BioWorks operates primarily in the Biotechnology industry.

How many employees does BioWorks have ?

BioWorks employs approximately 82 people worldwide.

Does BioWorks own any subsidiaries ?

BioWorks presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

How many LinkedIn followers does BioWorks have ?

BioWorks's official LinkedIn profile has approximately 9,581 followers.

Does BioWorks have a Crunchbase profile ?

No, BioWorks does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Does BioWorks have a LinkedIn profile ?

Yes, BioWorks maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/bioworks-inc..

How many cybersecurity incidents has BioWorks experienced ?

As of June 30, 2026, Rankiteo reports that BioWorks has experienced 1 cybersecurity incidents.

How many peer or competitor companies does BioWorks have ?

BioWorks has an estimated 1,072 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

What types of cybersecurity incidents has BioWorks faced ?

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Breach.

NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop

WindowsmacOSLinux

Download

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Link verified badges to your company page to build trust with insurers and customers.

Apply now and get your badge!

Internal validation & live display

Insurers and partners see a safer profile

Faster underwriting decisions

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Proud contributor to the Society of Actuaries.

BioWorks

Boost Score +25 with badge (5 left)

731

/1000

Moderate

756

/1000

Fair

BioWorks Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

bioworksinc.com

Add Your Compliance Badge

BioWorks provides integrated plant health management products and programs to customers in the horticulture and specialty agriculture markets. We want your crops, your business, and your people to thrive. Our biological control and plant nutrition products help accomplish this by eradicating harmful diseases and pests that threaten crops, while reducing reliance on harmful chemicals. We go above and beyond to protect your crops, strengthen them, and improve yield. BioWorks is a founding member of the Biological Products Industry Alliance (BPIA) and also a proud sponsor of the AFE scholarship program, funding the 'BioWorks IPM/Sustainable Practices Scholarship'. Please visit www.bioworksinc.com and find us on socials @bioworksipm

BioWorks A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Scoring History

BioWorks

BioWorks CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents

Attack Types

Entity

Type

Severity

Impact

Seen

Blog Details

Supply Chain Source

Incident Details

View

BioWorks

Breach

3/2022

BIO726072525

Loading…

A.I.

BioWorks Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction

Incident Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction A

Prediction B

Prediction C

Prediction D

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

Loading…

Underwriter Stats for BioWorks

Incidents vs Biotechnology Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BioWorks in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BioWorks in 2026.

Incident Types BioWorks vs Biotechnology Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BioWorks in 2026.

Incident History - BioWorks (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loading…

SUBSIDIARY

BioWorks Subsidiaries

Parent Company

BioWorks

Biotechnology

Website: http://www.bioworksinc.com

Company Size: 11-50 employees

No subsidiary data available for this company.

Loading…

BioWorks Similar Companies

Regeneron

cb regeneron.com

At Regeneron we believe that when the right idea finds the right team, powerful change is possible. As we work across our expanding global network to invent, develop and commercialize life-transforming medicines for people with serious diseases, we’re establishing new ways to think about science, manufacturing and commercialization. And new ways to think about health. Connect with us so we can learn more about you, and you can learn more about our biopharmaceutical medicines. And join us, as we build a future we believe in. Please visit www.regeneron.com/social-media-terms for information on how to engage with us on social media. An important note about privacy: Regeneron is committed to your privacy and will not ask for sensitive personal information such as social security number, date of birth or bank account details via email or social media.

Loading…

NEWS

BioWorks CyberSecurity News

Latest updates, reports, and threat intel affecting the global network.

March 02, 2026 10:23 PM

Ginkgo Bioworks Launches Ginkgo Cloud Lab, Powered by Autonomous Lab Infrastructure

Ginkgo Bioworks (NYSE: DNA) has announced the official launch of Ginkgo Cloud Lab, a new interface that allows researchers to transition...

Read Article

February 26, 2026 09:34 PM

Cost cuts narrow Ginkgo Bioworks (NYSE: DNA) 2025 net loss

Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings reported 2025 revenue of $170.2 million , down from $227.0 million in 2024, as both cell engineering and...

Read Article

August 15, 2024 07:00 AM

US lawmakers urge probe of WiFi router maker TP-Link over fears of Chinese cyber attacks

Two US lawmakers want the Biden administration to probe China's TP-Link Technology Co and its affiliates for potential national security risks.

Read Article

May 07, 2024 04:22 PM

Tech Leaders in Boston and New England

Our 2024 ranking highlights leaders who make New England's technology scene vibrant and vital. The list tells a story about where the industry stands.

Read Article

November 15, 2023 08:00 AM

Smart homes, smarter grids: the ‘Internet of Energy’ and the way to net zero

By embracing advances in AI and wireless networks, Aussie homes could drive our net zero transition.

Read Article

November 15, 2023 08:00 AM

New $18M partnership building digital tech for safer workplaces

A new collaboration between CSIRO and five universities will develop futuristic new tools and systems to protect Aussies from harm at work.

Read Article

July 08, 2022 07:00 AM

Meet the founder: Chinova Bioworks' CEO Natasha Dhayagude delves into her journey in bio-foodtech

Natasha Dhayagude, co-founder and CEO of Chinova Bioworks reveals to Agfunder her journey and maneuvering the bio-foodtech space.

Read Article

Loading…

CVE

Latest

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-8023

SUMMARY

Zephyr's HTTP server (subsys/net/lib/http) provides a static-filesystem resource type (HTTP_RESOURCE_TYPE_STATIC_FS, available when CONFIG_FILE_SYSTEM is enabled) that serves files from a configured root directory. Before this fix, both the HTTP/1 and HTTP/2 front-ends placed the raw, attacker-controlled request path into client-url_buffer (assembled in on_url() for HTTP/1 and copied verbatim from the :path pseudo-header for HTTP/2) without resolving ./.. segments. The static-FS handler then built the on-disk filename by directly concatenating the configured root with that raw URL (snprintk(fname, ..., "%s%s", static_fs_detail-fs_path, client-url_buffer) at http_server_http1.c:603 and http_server_http2.c:490) and opened it with fs_open(fname, FS_O_READ). Because the handler is reached via wildcard/leading-dir (fnmatch FNM_LEADING_DIR) or fallback resource matching, a request such as GET /<prefix/../../<file is dispatched to the handler and, after the underlying filesystem (e.g. LittleFS/FAT) resolves the .. segments, escapes the configured web root, letting an unauthenticated remote client read arbitrary readable files on the mounted volume (information disclosure). The HTTP server requires no TLS or authentication to reach this path. The fix adds http_server_remove_dot_segments(), which canonicalizes the path portion of the URL before resource lookup in both protocol handlers, neutralizing the traversal. Affects releases v4.0.0 through v4.4.0 for deployments that register a static-filesystem resource.

Published

Date2026-06-29

Updated

Date2026-06-29

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)

cvss3

Base Score: 7.5

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Impact Score

3.6

Exploitability

3.9

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-7656

SUMMARY

The IPv6 Neighbor Discovery handlers in subsys/net/ip/ipv6_nbr.c (handle_ra_input, handle_ns_input, handle_na_input) used an incorrect boolean expression that combined the RFC 4861 validity checks with the ICMPv6 code check using the wrong operator precedence: the form was '((length/hop/source/target checks) && (icmp_hdr-code != 0))'. Because every legitimate ND message carries ICMPv6 code 0, an attacker setting code == 0 (the normal value) caused the entire predicate to evaluate false, so the packet was never dropped and all of the other checks were silently skipped. The bypassed checks include the mandatory Hop Limit == 255 verification (which proves an ND packet originated on-link and was not forwarded) and, for Router Advertisements, the requirement that the source be a link-local address, as well as multicast-target sanity checks. As a result, an adjacent on-link attacker — and, because the Hop-Limit-255 guard is bypassed, potentially a remote/off-link attacker whose packets would otherwise be rejected — can have forged Router Advertisement, Neighbor Solicitation, and Neighbor Advertisement messages accepted. A forged RA lets the attacker reconfigure the victim's default router, on-link prefixes (SLAAC), MTU, reachable/retransmit timers, and (with CONFIG_NET_IPV6_RA_RDNSS) DNS servers, while forged NS/NA enable neighbor-cache poisoning, enabling man-in-the-middle, traffic redirection, and denial of service. The flaw is an input-validation/authentication weakness rather than a memory-safety issue: the underlying packet-parsing primitives (net_pkt_get_data, net_pkt_read, net_pkt_skip) are independently bounds-safe and the validated 'length' is the true buffer length, so skipping the length check causes no out-of-bounds access. The defect has existed since the logic was introduced in 2018 and shipped in all releases through v4.4.0; it is fixed by splitting the condition so any failing check drops the packet.

Published

Date2026-06-29

Updated

Date2026-06-29

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)

cvss3

Base Score: 8.1

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H

Impact Score

5.2

Exploitability

2.8

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-51219

SUMMARY

A heap buffer overflow in the HighPriorityASDUQueue_hasUnconfirmedIMessages function of lib60870 v2.3.3 to v2.3.6 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted payload.

Published

Date2026-06-29

Updated

Date2026-06-29

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-51218

SUMMARY

A heap buffer overflow in the TS7Worker::PerformFunctionWrite() function (/core/s7_server.cpp) of snap7 v1.4.3 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted packet.

Published

Date2026-06-29

Updated

Date2026-06-29

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-10648

SUMMARY

mcumgr_serial_process_frag() in subsys/mgmt/mcumgr/transport/src/serial_util.c calls net_buf_reset() on the result of smp_packet_alloc() before checking it for NULL. smp_packet_alloc() uses net_buf_alloc(K_NO_WAIT) against the shared MCUmgr packet pool (CONFIG_MCUMGR_TRANSPORT_NETBUF_COUNT, default 4), which returns NULL when the pool is exhausted. In default builds the __ASSERT_NO_MSG in net_buf_reset is a no-op, so net_buf_simple_reset writes through the NULL pointer (buf->len = 0; buf->data = buf->__buf), causing a fault/crash. The fragment data reaches this code from attacker-controlled bytes on the MCUmgr serial/UART/shell-console transports (smp_uart.c, smp_raw_uart.c, smp_shell.c), and a fresh buffer is allocated at the start of essentially every new packet. An attacker on the serial/console link can flood the transport to drive the 4-entry buffer pool to exhaustion and induce the NULL dereference, crashing the device (denial of service). The defect was introduced after the original MCUmgr rework and shipped in Zephyr v4.4.0. The fix moves the NULL check ahead of net_buf_reset.

Published

Date2026-06-29

Updated

Date2026-06-29

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.2)

cvss3

Base Score: 6.2

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Impact Score

3.6

Exploitability

2.5

REFERENCES

Loading…

API

Access Data Using Our API

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?
linkedin_id=axa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

Try It API Documentation Rapid

MEASURE

What Do We Measure ?

Incident

Finding

Grade

Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network SecurityIdentify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat IntelligenceLeverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Rankiteo

By Rankiteo

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

View on G2.com

Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.

View latest plans →View all security reports →

MILESTONEG

Users
Love Us

Loading…