BPS
Company Details
Linkedin ID:
biolifeplasmaservices
Website:
Employees number:
3,509
Number of followers:
19,025
NAICS:
3254
Industry Type:
Homepage:
biolifeplasma.com
IP Addresses:
0
Company ID:
BIO_3041744
Scan Status:
In-progress
BioLife Plasma Services Company CyberSecurity Posture
biolifeplasma.com
Every day at BioLife, we feel good knowing that what we do helps improve the lives of patients with rare diseases. While you focus on our donors, we’ll support you. We offer a purpose you can believe in, a team you can count on, opportunities for career growth, and a comprehensive benefits program, all in a fast-paced, friendly environment.
BioLife Plasma Services A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
BPS Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 700 and 749
BPS
Updated:
- Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
- Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
BPS Global Score (TPRM)XXXX
BPS
- Instant access to detailed risk factors
- Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
- Vulnerabilities
- Findings
BPS Company CyberSecurity News & History
Past Incidents
1
Attack Types
1
BioLife Plasma Services L.P.
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack limited on finance or reputation
Description: On March 15, 2024, the Washington State Office of the Attorney General reported that BioLife Plasma Services L.P. experienced a data breach due to a credential stuffing attack beginning on January 31, 2024. The breach potentially affected 874 individuals' names and full dates of birth. The breach was discovered on February 6, 2024.
BPS Company Scoring based on AI Models
Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
Underwriter Stats for BPS
Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for BioLife Plasma Services in 2025.
Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for BioLife Plasma Services in 2025.
Incident Types BPS vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for BioLife Plasma Services in 2025.
Incident History — BPS (X = Date, Y = Severity)
BPS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
BPS Company Subsidiaries
Every day at BioLife, we feel good knowing that what we do helps improve the lives of patients with rare diseases. While you focus on our donors, we’ll support you. We offer a purpose you can believe in, a team you can count on, opportunities for career growth, and a comprehensive benefits program, all in a fast-paced, friendly environment.
Loading...
BPS Similar Companies
Grifols
Grifols is a global healthcare company founded in Barcelona in 1909 committed to improving the health and well-being of people all over the world. A leader in essential plasma-derived medicines and transfusion medicine, we develop, produce and provide innovative healthcare services and solutions i
The Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson
At Janssen, we never stop working toward a future where disease is a thing of the past. We’re the Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson, and you can count on us to keep working tirelessly to make that future a reality for patients everywhere, by fighting sickness with science, improving ac
Ipca Laboratories Limited
A consumer-led global pharmaceutical company, creating healthy doses of life since 1949. When you operate in an industry like pharmaceuticals, your work goes way beyond creating ‘products for customers’. It is different from any other domain – there lies a higher sense of responsibiliti and a need
MANKIND PHARMA LTD
Mankind Pharma, one of the top 5 leading pharmaceutical companies in India, started its journey in 1995. Today, we have an employee base of over 20,000 and are racing towards $1 Billion. At Mankind, we aspire to aid the community in leading a healthy life by formulating, developing, commercializing,
Intas is one of the leading multinational pharmaceutical formulation development, manufacturing, and marketing organization in the world. It has been growing at 19% CAGR and crossed the $2.5 billion mark in the past financial year. The company has set up a network of subsidiaries, under the name Acc
Zydus Group
The Zydus Group with an overarching purpose of empowering people with freedom to live healthier and more fulfilled lives, is an innovative, global life-sciences company that discovers, develops, manufactures, and markets a broad range of healthcare therapies. The group employs over 27000 people worl
SUN PHARMA
Sun Pharma is the world's fourth-largest speciality generic pharmaceutical company and No. 1 in India. We provide high-quality, affordable medicines trusted by customers and patients in over 100 countries. Sun Pharma's global presence is supported by more than 40 manufacturing facilities spread acro
At Lonza, we enable A Healthier World by supporting our healthcare customers on the path to commercialization. Our community of 16,000 talented employees work across a global network of more than 30 sites to deliver for our customers across the pharma, biotech and nutrition markets. By combining t
Fresenius Kabi
As a global healthcare company, Fresenius Kabi is Committed to Life. The company’s products, technologies, and services are used for the therapy and care of critically and chronically ill patients. With over 41,000 employees and present in over 100 countries, Fresenius Kabi’s expansive product portf
.png)
BPS CyberSecurity News
January 23, 2025 08:00 AM
BioLife Plasma Sued Over Data Sharing With Snap, Salesforce
BioLife Plasma Services LP and Takeda Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. enabled third parties to intercept the personal information of BioLife...
March 21, 2024 07:00 AM
BioLife Plasma Services Data Breach Class Action Lawsuit Assistance
If you were affected by the recent BioLife Plasma Services data breach, our data breach lawyers can help you learn your legal options.
August 19, 2021 07:00 AM
BioLife Plasma Services Opens First All-Electric Plasma Donation Center
The new Tukwila, WA center underscores the urgent patient need for plasma while supporting Takeda's sustainability goal to have zero carbon...
Frequently Asked Questions
Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.
BPS CyberSecurity History Information
Official Website of BioLife Plasma Services
The official website of BioLife Plasma Services is http://www.biolifeplasma.com.
BioLife Plasma Services’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score
According to Rankiteo, BioLife Plasma Services’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 715, reflecting their Moderate security posture.
How many security badges does BioLife Plasma Services’ have ?
According to Rankiteo, BioLife Plasma Services currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.
Does BioLife Plasma Services have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, BioLife Plasma Services is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.
Does BioLife Plasma Services have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, BioLife Plasma Services does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
Does BioLife Plasma Services comply with GDPR ?
According to Rankiteo, BioLife Plasma Services is not listed as GDPR compliant.
Does BioLife Plasma Services have PCI DSS certification ?
According to Rankiteo, BioLife Plasma Services does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.
Does BioLife Plasma Services comply with HIPAA ?
According to Rankiteo, BioLife Plasma Services is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.
Does BioLife Plasma Services have ISO 27001 certification ?
According to Rankiteo,BioLife Plasma Services is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.
Industry Classification of BioLife Plasma Services
BioLife Plasma Services operates primarily in the Pharmaceutical Manufacturing industry.
Number of Employees at BioLife Plasma Services
BioLife Plasma Services employs approximately 3,509 people worldwide.
Subsidiaries Owned by BioLife Plasma Services
BioLife Plasma Services presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.
BioLife Plasma Services’s LinkedIn Followers
BioLife Plasma Services’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 19,025 followers.
NAICS Classification of BioLife Plasma Services
BioLife Plasma Services is classified under the NAICS code 3254, which corresponds to Pharmaceutical and Medicine Manufacturing.
BioLife Plasma Services’s Presence on Crunchbase
No, BioLife Plasma Services does not have a profile on Crunchbase.
BioLife Plasma Services’s Presence on LinkedIn
Yes, BioLife Plasma Services maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/biolifeplasmaservices.
Cybersecurity Incidents Involving BioLife Plasma Services
As of November 27, 2025, Rankiteo reports that BioLife Plasma Services has experienced 1 cybersecurity incidents.
Number of Peer and Competitor Companies
BioLife Plasma Services has an estimated 5,259 peer or competitor companies worldwide.
What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at BioLife Plasma Services ?
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Breach.
Incident Details
Can you provide details on each incident ?
Title: BioLife Plasma Services Data Breach
Description: BioLife Plasma Services L.P. experienced a data breach due to a credential stuffing attack, potentially affecting 874 individuals' names and full dates of birth.
Date Detected: 2024-02-06
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2024-03-15
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Credential Stuffing
What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?
Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Breach.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the impact of each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach BIO201072825
Data Compromised: Names, Full dates of birth
What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Names, Full Dates Of Birth and .
Which entities were affected by each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach BIO201072825
Entity Name: BioLife Plasma Services L.P.
Entity Type: Company
Industry: Healthcare
Customers Affected: 874
Data Breach Information
What type of data was compromised in each breach ?
Incident : Data Breach BIO201072825
Type of Data Compromised: Names, Full dates of birth
Number of Records Exposed: 874
References
Where can I find more information about each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach BIO201072825
Source: Washington State Office of the Attorney General
Date Accessed: 2024-03-15
Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: Washington State Office of the Attorney GeneralDate Accessed: 2024-03-15.
Additional Questions
Incident Details
What was the most recent incident detected ?
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on 2024-02-06.
What was the most recent incident publicly disclosed ?
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on 2024-03-15.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were Names, Full Dates of Birth and .
Data Breach Information
What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were Names and Full Dates of Birth.
What was the number of records exposed in the most significant breach ?
Number of Records Exposed in Most Significant Breach: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was 874.0.
References
What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is Washington State Office of the Attorney General.
.png)
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
- https://github.com/angular/angular/commit/0276479e7d0e280e0f8d26fa567d3b7aa97a516f
- https://github.com/angular/angular/commit/05fe6686a97fa0bcd3cf157805b3612033f975bc
- https://github.com/angular/angular/commit/3240d856d942727372a705252f7c8c115394a41e
- https://github.com/angular/angular/releases/tag/19.2.16
- https://github.com/angular/angular/releases/tag/20.3.14
- https://github.com/angular/angular/releases/tag/21.0.1
- https://github.com/angular/angular/security/advisories/GHSA-58c5-g7wp-6w37
Description
Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description
Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=biolifeplasmaservices' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
RapidWhat Do We Measure ?
Incident
Finding
Grade
Digital Assets
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Network Security
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
CMDB (Configuration Management Database)
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Threat Intelligence
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
