Comparison Overview

BioLife Plasma Services

VS

Lonza

BioLife Plasma Services

None, None, Bannockburn , Illinois , US, None
Last Update: 2026-01-25
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.biolifeplasma.com

Every day at BioLife, we feel good knowing that what we do helps improve the lives of patients with rare diseases. While you focus on our donors, we’ll support you. We offer a purpose you can believe in, a team you can count on, opportunities for career growth, and a comprehensive benefits program, all in a fast-paced, friendly environment.

NAICS: 3254
NAICS Definition: Pharmaceutical and Medicine Manufacturing
Employees: 3,509
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Lonza

Muenchensteinerstr. 38, Basel, CH, 4002
Last Update: 2026-01-19
Between 800 and 849
http://www.lonza.com

Lonza is a pioneer and world leader in the CDMO industry, setting the pace with cutting-edge science, smart technology, and lean manufacturing. United by a common purpose, we turn our customers’ breakthrough innovations into viable therapies and manufacture the medicines of tomorrow. Founded in Switzerland in 1897, our company is the first and original CDMO, and today we are more dynamic, agile and forward-focused than ever before. As one of the largest Western CDMOs, we bring together a global team of around 18,500 colleagues across five continents to deliver comprehensive, integrated solutions for our customers' complex needs. For our customers and their patients, we bring quality, safety and reliability to bring life-enhancing and life-saving treatments to market at speed and at scale. For our colleagues, we strive to create a sense of belonging and inclusion where every person can thrive and bring their best.

NAICS: 3254
NAICS Definition: Pharmaceutical and Medicine Manufacturing
Employees: 18,683
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/biolifeplasmaservices.jpeg
BioLife Plasma Services
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lonza.jpeg
Lonza
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
BioLife Plasma Services
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lonza
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BioLife Plasma Services in 2026.

Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lonza in 2026.

Incident History — BioLife Plasma Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BioLife Plasma Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lonza (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lonza cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/biolifeplasmaservices.jpeg
BioLife Plasma Services
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Credential Stuffing
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lonza.jpeg
Lonza
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Lonza company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to BioLife Plasma Services company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

BioLife Plasma Services company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Lonza company has not reported any.

In the current year, Lonza company and BioLife Plasma Services company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Lonza company nor BioLife Plasma Services company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

BioLife Plasma Services company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Lonza company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Lonza company nor BioLife Plasma Services company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither BioLife Plasma Services company nor Lonza company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither BioLife Plasma Services nor Lonza holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Lonza company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to BioLife Plasma Services company.

Lonza company employs more people globally than BioLife Plasma Services company, reflecting its scale as a Pharmaceutical Manufacturing.

Neither BioLife Plasma Services nor Lonza holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither BioLife Plasma Services nor Lonza holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither BioLife Plasma Services nor Lonza holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither BioLife Plasma Services nor Lonza holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither BioLife Plasma Services nor Lonza holds HIPAA certification.

Neither BioLife Plasma Services nor Lonza holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References