Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Digital Innovation, Geoinformation & Open Government DataDigital Innovation, Geoinformation & Open Government Data
VS
MANTECHMANTECH
Digital Innovation, Geoinformation & Open Government Data

Digital Innovation, Geoinformation & Open Government Data

Pulverstrasse 13, Ittigen, 3063, CH

Last Update: 13/03/2026

View Profile

Wir publizieren aktuelle Informationen in Bezug zu Digitalen Innovationen, Geoinformationen, Open Government Data und Datenmanagement im Energiesektor der Schweiz.

NAICS:541516
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:68
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
MANTECH

MANTECH

2251 Corporate Park Drive, Herndon, 20171, US

Last Update: 07/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.MANTECH.com/
774/1000Fair

MANTECH is more than a technology company. We are a company dedicated to service, and we consider our work a part of the public trust. The people of MANTECH are privileged to work for the security of the United States, the welfare of our service members and veterans, th...

NAICS:541516
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:10,501
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Digital Innovation, Geoinformation & Open Government Data

Digital Innovation, Geoinformation & Open Government Data

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
MANTECH

MANTECH

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT System Data Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Digital Innovation, Geoinformation & Open Government Data in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT System Data Services Industry Avg (This Year)

MANTECH has 3.85% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Digital Innovation, Geoinformation & Open Government Data (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Digital Innovation, Geoinformation & Open Government Data cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - MANTECH (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MANTECH cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Digital Innovation, Geoinformation & Open Government Data

Digital Innovation, Geoinformation & Open Government Data

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
MANTECH

MANTECH

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
CIS1784025731

FAQ

Between Digital Innovation, Geoinformation & Open Government Data company and MANTECH company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Digital Innovation, Geoinformation & Open Government Data company and MANTECH company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Digital Innovation, Geoinformation & Open Government Data company and MANTECH company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Digital Innovation, Geoinformation & Open Government Data company and MANTECH company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Digital Innovation, Geoinformation & Open Government Data company and MANTECH company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Digital Innovation, Geoinformation & Open Government Data company and MANTECH company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Digital Innovation, Geoinformation & Open Government Data company and MANTECH company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Digital Innovation, Geoinformation & Open Government Data company and MANTECH company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Digital Innovation, Geoinformation & Open Government Data company and MANTECH company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Digital Innovation, Geoinformation & Open Government Data company and MANTECH company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Digital Innovation, Geoinformation & Open Government Data company and MANTECH company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Digital Innovation, Geoinformation & Open Government Data and MANTECH, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Digital Innovation, Geoinformation & Open Government Data and MANTECH, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Digital Innovation, Geoinformation & Open Government Data or MANTECH ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Digital Innovation, Geoinformation & Open Government Data or MANTECH ?
Between Digital Innovation, Geoinformation & Open Government Data and MANTECH, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Digital Innovation, Geoinformation & Open Government Data and MANTECH, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-63261
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A low-privileged authenticated user can send a specially crafted request to a Kibana machine learning feature, causing the server to exhaust available memory and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63260
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated attacker with low-privilege access can trigger a denial of service condition in Kibana by sending a specially crafted, oversized request payload. Processing this user-supplied input requires resource-intensive memory allocation that can exhaust the available heap memory in the Kibana process, causing it to crash and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63259
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via user-supplied identifiers that reference scheduled query result data from Kibana Spaces the requester is not authorized to access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63145
SUMMARY

Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to integrity compromise of Machine Learning audit and notification records via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A vulnerability exists in Kibana's Machine Learning functionality where a Machine Learning management endpoint performs an insufficient authorization check. The endpoint validates only a coarse privilege level but does not verify that the requesting user has access to the specific Machine Learning job or notification resources provided in the request. As a result, a low-privileged user with Machine Learning access in any Kibana space can manipulate Machine Learning audit and notification records for arbitrary jobs—including jobs in other spaces or belonging to other users—by leveraging Kibana's internally elevated credentials to write to restricted Machine Learning system indices that the user cannot access directly.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63144
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to denial of service via a specially crafted search request submitted by a low-privileged authenticated user. A user with read-level index access can submit a request that triggers unbounded recursive processing within the Elasticsearch query evaluation component, causing a fatal error that terminates the affected node. In single-node deployments, this results in complete service outage; in multi-node clusters, it causes repeated node restarts and sustained availability degradation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8