Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Bezirkssparkasse ReichenauBezirkssparkasse Reichenau
VS
Bank of America Merrill LynchBank of America Merrill Lynch
Bezirkssparkasse Reichenau

Bezirkssparkasse Reichenau

Abt-Berno-Straße 1, Reichenau, 78479, DE

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.spk-reichenau.de
756/1000Fair

Mit unseren über 160 Mitarbeitenden bewegen wir eine Bilanzsumme von 1,6 Mrd. EUR. Damit sind wir effizienter Finanzpartner unserer Kunden. Wir bieten Lösungen rund ums private und geschäftliche Bankgeschäft. Besonders spezialisert sind wir auf die Finanzierung des wohn...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:31
Subsidiaries:63
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Bank of America Merrill Lynch

Bank of America Merrill Lynch

100 North Tryon Street, Charlotte, 28255, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bofaml.com
787/1000Fair

From local communities to global markets, we are dedicated to shaping the future responsibly and helping clients thrive in a changing world. “Bank of America Merrill Lynch” is the marketing name for the global banking and global markets businesses of Bank of America Co...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:16,629
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Bezirkssparkasse Reichenau

Bezirkssparkasse Reichenau

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Bank of America Merrill Lynch

Bank of America Merrill Lynch

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bezirkssparkasse Reichenau in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bank of America Merrill Lynch in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Bezirkssparkasse Reichenau (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bezirkssparkasse Reichenau cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Bank of America Merrill Lynch (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bank of America Merrill Lynch cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Bezirkssparkasse Reichenau

Bezirkssparkasse Reichenau

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Bank of America Merrill Lynch

Bank of America Merrill Lynch

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Bezirkssparkasse Reichenau company and Bank of America Merrill Lynch company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Bezirkssparkasse Reichenau company and Bank of America Merrill Lynch company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Bezirkssparkasse Reichenau company and Bank of America Merrill Lynch company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Bezirkssparkasse Reichenau company and Bank of America Merrill Lynch company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Bezirkssparkasse Reichenau company and Bank of America Merrill Lynch company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Bezirkssparkasse Reichenau company and Bank of America Merrill Lynch company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Bezirkssparkasse Reichenau company and Bank of America Merrill Lynch company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Bezirkssparkasse Reichenau company and Bank of America Merrill Lynch company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Bezirkssparkasse Reichenau company and Bank of America Merrill Lynch company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Bezirkssparkasse Reichenau company and Bank of America Merrill Lynch company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Bezirkssparkasse Reichenau company and Bank of America Merrill Lynch company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Bezirkssparkasse Reichenau and Bank of America Merrill Lynch, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Bezirkssparkasse Reichenau and Bank of America Merrill Lynch, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Bezirkssparkasse Reichenau or Bank of America Merrill Lynch ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Bezirkssparkasse Reichenau or Bank of America Merrill Lynch ?
Between Bezirkssparkasse Reichenau and Bank of America Merrill Lynch, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Bezirkssparkasse Reichenau and Bank of America Merrill Lynch, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-80138
SUMMARY

ClipBucket V5's web installer fails to properly validate or escape the php_cli_filepath parameter before passing it to shell execution. Unauthenticated attackers can submit a crafted POST request to the installer with a malicious php_cli_filepath value to execute arbitrary commands as the web server user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-25
UPDATED
Date2026-08-25
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-79912
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was detected in TOTOLINK N600R 4.3.0cu.7647_B20210106. The impacted element is the function getCurrentTime of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. Performing a manipulation of the argument ntp_server results in command injection. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-25
UPDATED
Date2026-08-25
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.7
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-79911
SUMMARY

A security vulnerability has been detected in TOTOLINK N600R 4.3.0cu.7647_B20210106. The affected element is the function setSystemConfig of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi of the component CGI Handler. Such manipulation of the argument Hostname leads to stack-based buffer overflow. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-25
UPDATED
Date2026-08-25
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS2
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-70665
SUMMARY

Doorkeeper OpenID Connect implements an OpenID Connect authentication provider for Rails applications on top of Doorkeeper. Prior to 1.10.4, the Dynamic Client Registration (DCR) endpoint persists client-supplied scopes without validating them against the server's configured scope set. Under certain conditions, this allows a self-registered client to obtain scopes beyond what the server intended to grant. In DynamicClientRegistrationController#application_params, the scopes attribute is assigned directly from params[:scope] with no validation against Doorkeeper.configuration.scopes or optional_scopes. Combined with enforce_configured_scopes being off by default and Doorkeeper's ScopeChecker prioritizing application-level scopes over server-level scopes, this creates a privilege escalation path. This issue is fixed in version 1.10.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-25
UPDATED
Date2026-08-25
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-55805
SUMMARY

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ("Cross-site Scripting") vulnerability in Drupal Drupal core allows Stored XSS. This issue affects Drupal core versions: from 0.0.0 to 10.6.13, from 11.3.0 to 11.3.14, from 11.4.0 to 11.4.4, from 0.0.0 to 11.0.*, from 0.0.0 to 11.1.*, from 0.0.0 to 11.2.*.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-25
UPDATED
Date2026-08-25
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA