What is the official website of BetterHelp ?

The official website of BetterHelp is http://betterhelp.com/linkedin.

What is BetterHelp's cybersecurity risk score?

BetterHelp has an AI-generated cybersecurity risk score of 769 out of 1000, indicating a Fair security posture according to Rankiteo's assessment.

How many security incidents has BetterHelp experienced?

According to Rankiteo, BetterHelp currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has BetterHelp been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, BetterHelp has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does BetterHelp have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, BetterHelp is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does BetterHelp have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, BetterHelp does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does BetterHelp comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, BetterHelp is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does BetterHelp have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, BetterHelp does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does BetterHelp comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, BetterHelp is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does BetterHelp have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,BetterHelp is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Which industry does BetterHelp operate in ?

BetterHelp operates primarily in the Mental Health Care industry.

How many employees does BetterHelp have ?

BetterHelp employs approximately 3,633 people worldwide.

Does BetterHelp own any subsidiaries ?

BetterHelp presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

How many LinkedIn followers does BetterHelp have ?

BetterHelp's official LinkedIn profile has approximately 104,857 followers.

Does BetterHelp have a Crunchbase profile ?

No, BetterHelp does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Does BetterHelp have a LinkedIn profile ?

Yes, BetterHelp maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/betterhelp.

How many cybersecurity incidents has BetterHelp experienced ?

As of June 6, 2026, Rankiteo reports that BetterHelp has not experienced any cybersecurity incidents.

How many peer or competitor companies does BetterHelp have ?

BetterHelp has an estimated 5,416 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop

WindowsmacOSLinux

Download

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Link verified badges to your company page to build trust with insurers and customers.

Apply now and get your badge!

Internal validation & live display

Insurers and partners see a safer profile

Faster underwriting decisions

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Proud contributor to the Society of Actuaries.

BetterHelp

Boost Score +25 with badge (5 left)

769

/1000

Fair

794

/1000

Fair

BetterHelp Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

betterhelp.com

Add Your Compliance Badge

BetterHelp is the world’s largest online therapy service, facilitating millions of video sessions, voice calls, chats, and messages between therapists and members every month. Since 2013, our network of over 30,000 licensed, accredited, and board-certified therapists have helped more than 4,000,000 people face life’s challenges and improve their mental health. Read how we affected people's lives: www.betterhelp.com/reviews

BetterHelp A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Scoring History

BetterHelp

BetterHelp CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents

Attack Types

Entity

Type

Severity

Impact

Seen

Blog Details

Supply Chain Source

Incident Details

View

No data available

Loading…

A.I.

BetterHelp Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction

Incident Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction A

Prediction B

Prediction C

Prediction D

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

Loading…

Underwriter Stats for BetterHelp

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BetterHelp in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BetterHelp in 2026.

Incident Types BetterHelp vs Mental Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BetterHelp in 2026.

Incident History - BetterHelp (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loading…

SUBSIDIARY

BetterHelp Subsidiaries

BetterHelp

Mental Health Care

Website: http://betterhelp.com/linkedin

Company Size: 3,633

Teladoc HealthHospitals and Health Care

LivongoWellness and Fitness Services

Teladoc Health for Hospitals and Health SystemsHospitals and Health Care

Teladoc Health UKHospitals and Health Care

TeladocHealth, Wellness & Fitness

Loading…

BetterHelp Similar Companies

Loading…

NEWS

BetterHelp CyberSecurity News

Latest updates, reports, and threat intel affecting the global network.

March 10, 2026 07:00 AM

Escape: $18 Million Raised For AI Cybersecurity Platform

Escape, an offensive security engineering platform that uses AI agents to discover and fix software vulnerabilities, has raised $18 million...

Read Article

January 23, 2026 08:00 AM

Call for Comments on NIST SP 800-82, Guide to Operational Technology (OT) Security

NIST has initiated the process of revising Special Publication (SP) 800-82, Guide to Operational Technology (OT) Security, to incorporate...

Read Article

November 20, 2025 08:00 AM

SRS #255 Ryan Montgomery – Roblox & Minecraft: Hacker Exposes the Larg

Ryan Montgomery is a renowned ethical hacker, penetration tester, and cybersecurity expert, ranked #1 on TryHackMe's Capture The Flag...

Read Article

May 10, 2024 07:00 AM

BetterHelp sending millions in refunds to customers after privacy settlement. How to know if you qualify

BetterHelp had agreed to pay $7.8 million in refunds after settling on allegations that it shared personal customer data for advertising...

Read Article

May 06, 2024 07:00 AM

BetterHelp Customers Will Begin Receiving Notices About Refunds Related to a 2023 Privacy Settlement with FTC

BetterHelp agreed to pay $7.8 million to settle FTC allegations that the online therapy provider used and shared consumers' health data for advertising.

Read Article

January 05, 2024 08:00 AM

Year in Review: The Top 10 US Data Privacy Developments From 2023

2023 marked a pivotal moment in US data privacy and cybersecurity, characterized by substantial regulatory and legislative advances at the international,...

Read Article

July 25, 2023 06:54 PM

SEC, FTC headline a rise in U.S. privacy and cybersecurity efforts

Data privacy and cybersecurity risks remain top of the agenda U.S. regulators, signaling to businesses the need to be compliance ready.

Read Article

May 02, 2023 07:00 AM

How FTC Enforcement Actions Will Impact Telehealth Data Privacy

Recent high-profile settlements against telehealth companies show that the FTC is willing to enforce its Health Breach Notification Rule and hold entities...

Read Article

April 18, 2023 07:00 AM

Privacy Violations: Mitigation Strategies and Cyber Insurance Considerations

In recent years, we have seen a surge in litigation involving privacy violations in the United States. Companies that engage in activities...

Read Article

Loading…

CVE

Latest

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-7654

SUMMARY

The Admin Columns plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to PHP Object Injection leading to Remote Code Execution in versions up to and including 7.0.18. This is due to the use of `unserialize()` without an `allowed_classes` restriction in the `IdsToCollection::get_ids_from_string()` function, which processes attacker-controlled post meta values without proper validation. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers with Contributor-level access and above to inject a serialized PHP object into a post's custom meta field and trigger arbitrary code execution by exploiting a bundled POP gadget chain, resulting in remote code execution as the web server user.

Published

Date2026-06-05

Updated

Date2026-06-05

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)

cvss3

Base Score: 8.8

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Impact Score

5.9

Exploitability

2.8

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-7523

SUMMARY

The Alba Board plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to authorization bypass in all versions up to, and including, 2.1.3. This is due to the plugin not properly verifying that a user is authorized to perform an action. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to access arbitrary private alba_card post data, including title, description, assignee, due date, tags, and comments, that is intended to be restricted to Administrators and Editors. The handler is registered via the wp_ajax_nopriv_ hook and its nonce is exposed to all site visitors through wp_localize_script on pages containing the [alba_board] shortcode, making this exploitable by unauthenticated users who can access any such page.

Published

Date2026-06-05

Updated

Date2026-06-05

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)

cvss3

Base Score: 4.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Impact Score

1.4

Exploitability

2.8

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-45409

SUMMARY

Internationalized Domain Names in Applications (IDNA) for Python provides support for Internationalized Domain Names in Applications (IDNA) and Unicode IDNA Compatibility Processing. In versions prior to 3.15, payloads such as `"\u0660" * N` or `"\u30fb" * N + "\u6f22"` utilize the `valid_contexto` function prior to length rejection, and for high values of `N` will take a long time to process. This is the same issue as CVE-2024-3651, however the original remediation in 2024 was not a complete fix. A specially crafted argument to the `idna.encode()` function could consume significant resources. This may lead to a denial-of-service. Starting in version 3.14, the function rejects long inputs as soon as practicable prior to any further processing to minimize resource consumption. In version 3.15, this approach was extended to lesser used alternate functions (i.e. per-label conversions and codec support). A workaround is available. Domain names cannot exceed 253 characters in length. If this length limit is enforced prior to passing the domain to the `idna.encode()` function, it should no longer consume significant resources. This is triggered by arbitrarily large inputs that would not occur in normal usage, but may be passed to the library assuming there is no preliminary input validation by the higher-level application.

Published

Date2026-06-05

Updated

Date2026-06-05

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 6.9

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

https://github.com/kjd/idna/security/advisories/GHSA-65pc-fj4g-8rjx

CVE-2026-11431

SUMMARY

A path traversal vulnerability exists in the Projects Service download endpoint shared by Altium Enterprise Server and Altium 365. An authenticated user can supply a crafted path parameter that bypasses validation, allowing arbitrary files (including entire directories returned as archives) to be read from the server filesystem. Because the readable files include service configuration and credential material, exploitation can be used to gather information enabling further compromise. The issue can be combined with CVE-2026-11424 to reach the cloud-side endpoint. On multi-tenant Altium 365 deployments, the readable configuration could have exposed credentials shared across services. Altium Enterprise Server is fixed in 8.1.1; the issue has been remediated in Altium 365 at the service level.

Published

Date2026-06-05

Updated

Date2026-06-05

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 8.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

https://www.altium.com/platform/security-compliance/security-advisories

CVE-2026-11429

SUMMARY

A path traversal vulnerability exists in the Git Service component shared by Altium Enterprise Server and Altium 365. The service accepts a sequence of post-clone file-manipulation operations that use user-supplied paths without validation, allowing an authenticated user with basic git access to move arbitrary files outside the intended repository area. This file-move primitive can be used to place attacker-controlled script content into directories where it is later executed by the service, resulting in remote code execution under the Git Service account. On multi-tenant Altium 365 deployments, this could have allowed access to data belonging to other tenants on the same infrastructure node. Altium Enterprise Server is fixed in 8.1.1; the issue has been remediated in Altium 365 at the service level.

Published

Date2026-06-05

Updated

Date2026-06-05

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 9.4

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

https://www.altium.com/platform/security-compliance/security-advisories

Loading…

API

Access Data Using Our API

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?
linkedin_id=axa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

Try It API Documentation Rapid

MEASURE

What Do We Measure ?

Incident

Finding

Grade

Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network SecurityIdentify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat IntelligenceLeverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Rankiteo

By Rankiteo

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

View on G2.com

Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.

View latest plans →View all security reports →

MILESTONEG

Users
Love Us

Loading…