Comparison Overview
Berry AI

Berry AI
Taipei, TW
Last Update: 09/06/2026
Next to food, "Speed of Service" is the most impactful part of the customer experience at QSR restaurants. It literally determines customer loyalty, repeat visits, and how much profit a QSR location can make. The problem? Most QSR operators are stuck using legacy techn...

Agoda
20 Cecil Street, #1401, Singapore, 049705, SG
Last Update: 23/04/2026
At Agoda, we bridge the world through travel. We aim to make it easy and rewarding for more travelers to explore and experience the amazing world we live in. We do so by enabling more people to see the world for less – with our best-value deals across our 6,000,000+ hot...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Berry AI







Agoda






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
Berry AI has 4.76% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
Agoda has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Berry AI (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Berry AI cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Agoda (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Agoda cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Berry AI

Agoda
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.