What is the official website of BeBoulder ?

The official website of BeBoulder is http://colorado.edu/beboulder/.

What is BeBoulder's cybersecurity risk score?

BeBoulder has an AI-generated cybersecurity risk score of 787 out of 1000, indicating a Fair security posture according to Rankiteo's assessment.

How many security incidents has BeBoulder experienced?

According to Rankiteo, BeBoulder currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has BeBoulder been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, BeBoulder has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does BeBoulder have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, BeBoulder is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does BeBoulder have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, BeBoulder does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does BeBoulder comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, BeBoulder is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does BeBoulder have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, BeBoulder does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does BeBoulder comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, BeBoulder is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does BeBoulder have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,BeBoulder is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Which industry does BeBoulder operate in ?

BeBoulder operates primarily in the Higher Education industry.

How many employees does BeBoulder have ?

BeBoulder employs approximately None employees people worldwide.

Does BeBoulder own any subsidiaries ?

BeBoulder presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

How many LinkedIn followers does BeBoulder have ?

BeBoulder's official LinkedIn profile has approximately followers.

What is the NAICS classification code for BeBoulder ?

BeBoulder is classified under the NAICS code 6113, which corresponds to Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools.

Does BeBoulder have a Crunchbase profile ?

No, BeBoulder does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Does BeBoulder have a LinkedIn profile ?

Yes, BeBoulder maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/beboulder.

How many cybersecurity incidents has BeBoulder experienced ?

As of October 20, 2026, Rankiteo reports that BeBoulder has experienced 1 cybersecurity incidents.

How many peer or competitor companies does BeBoulder have ?

BeBoulder has an estimated 17,469 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

What types of cybersecurity incidents has BeBoulder faced ?

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Breach.

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Link verified badges to your company page to build trust with insurers and customers.

Apply now and get your badge!

Internal validation & live display

Insurers and partners see a safer profile

Faster underwriting decisions

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Proud contributor to the Society of Actuaries.

BeBoulder

Boost Score +25 with badge (5 left)

787

/1000

Fair

812

/1000

Good

BeBoulder Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

colorado.edu

Add Your Compliance Badge

The University of Colorado Boulder enables each member of our community to reach their potential and to Be Boulder.

BeBoulder

BeBoulder CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents

Attack Types

Entity

Type

Severity

Impact

Seen

Blog Details

Supply Chain Source

Incident Details

View

BeBoulder

Breach

10/2021

UNI222771222

Loading…

A.I.

BeBoulder Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction

Incident Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction A

Prediction B

Prediction C

Prediction D

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

Loading…

Underwriter Stats for BeBoulder

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BeBoulder in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BeBoulder in 2026.

Incident Types BeBoulder vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BeBoulder in 2026.

Incident History - BeBoulder (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loading…

SUBSIDIARY

BeBoulder Subsidiaries

BeBoulder

Higher Education

Website: http://colorado.edu/beboulder/

Company Size: None employees

University of Colorado BoulderHigher Education

University of Colorado Boulder College of Engineering & Applied ScienceHigher Education

University of ColoradoHigher Education

University of Colorado DenverHigher Education

University of Colorado Denver School of Public AffairsPublic Policy Offices

Denver Community Leadership ForumProfessional Training and Coaching

University of Colorado Colorado SpringsHigher Education

UCCS Economic ForumHigher Education

University of Colorado Anschutz Medical CampusHigher Education

Strauss Health Sciences LibraryLibraries

University of Colorado Law SchoolHigher Education

University of Colorado Boulder Graduate SchoolHigher Education

Loading…

BeBoulder Similar Companies

Washington University in St. Louis

washu.edu

Washington University in St. Louis, a medium-sized, independent university, is dedicated to challenging its faculty and students alike to seek new knowledge and greater understanding of an ever-changing, multicultural world. The university has played an integral role in the history and continuing growth of St. Louis and benefits in turn from the wide array of social, cultural and recreational opportunities offered by the metropolitan area to its more than 2.8 million residents. The mission of Washington University in St. Louis is the promotion of learning — learning by students and by faculty. Teaching, the transmission of knowledge, is central to our mission, as is research, the creation of new knowledge.

UC Irvine

uci.edu

Since 1965, the University of California, Irvine has combined the strengths of a major research university with the bounty of an incomparable Southern California location. As a U.S. News & World Report top 10 public university, UCI’s unyielding commitment to rigorous academics, cutting-edge research, and leadership and character development makes the campus a driving force for innovation and discovery that serves our local, national and global communities in many ways. With more than 37,000 students, 1,497 faculty members and 11,622 staff, UCI is among the most dynamic campuses in the University of California system. Increasingly a first-choice campus for students, UCI ranks among the top U.S. universities in the number of undergraduate applications and continues to admit freshmen with highly competitive academic profiles. UCI is also ranked No. 2 by U.S. News & World Report for social mobility, which takes into account the graduation rate of students awarded Pell Grants. Orange County’s second-largest employer, UCI generates an annual economic impact on the county of $7 billion. http://www.uci.edu/

Brigham Young University

byu.edu

We believe a world yearning for hope and joy needs the graduates of Brigham Young University—disciples of Jesus Christ who are driven by love for God and His children and who are prepared to serve and lead. This preparation demands a unique university model: at BYU, belief enhances inquiry, study amplifies faith, and revelation leads to rich understanding; at BYU, helping students develop their full divine potential is central to both our teaching and our scholarship. As the flagship higher education institution of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, BYU strives to be among the exceptional universities in the world and an essential university for the world.

New York University

nyu.edu

Founded in 1831, NYU is one of the world’s foremost research universities and is a member of the selective Association of American Universities. The first Global Network University, NYU has degree-granting university campuses in New York and Abu Dhabi, and has announced a third in Shanghai; has a dozen other global academic sites, including London, Paris, Florence, Tel Aviv, Buenos Aires, and Accra; and sends more students to study abroad than any other U.S. college or university. Through its numerous schools and colleges, NYU conducts research and provides education in the arts and sciences, law, medicine, business, dentistry, education, nursing, the cinematic and performing arts, music and studio arts, public administration, social work, and continuing and professional studies, among other areas.

University of Colorado Boulder

colorado.edu

The University of Colorado Boulder is Colorado’s leading public research university, transforming lives since 1876. As the state's flagship university and one of only 38 U.S. public research institutions in the Association of American Universities (AAU), CU Boulder has proudly served Coloradans since the state's founding. Home to five Nobel Laureates since 1989 and the only university to send space instruments to every planet in the solar system, CU Boulder provides a strong return on investment by aligning efforts to achieve research and creative excellence, global sustainability impact and the success of all students, faculty and staff.

USP - Universidade de São Paulo

usp.br

A Universidade de São Paulo (USP) é uma universidade pública, mantida pelo Estado de São Paulo e ligada à Secretaria de Desenvolvimento Econômico, Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação (SDECTI). O talento e dedicação dos docentes, alunos e funcionários têm sido reconhecidos por diferentes rankings mundiais, criados para medir a qualidade das universidades a partir de diversos critérios, principalmente os relacionados à produtividade científica.

Tecnológico de Monterrey

tec.mx

The Tecnológico de Monterrey is a private university system with 33 campuses in 26 cities in Mexico, which serves more than 96,000 students in its high school, undergraduate and graduate programs. It also has liaison offices in 12 countries. Through the promotion of research, generation of knowledge transfer models and technology, it promotes the building of a knowledge-based economy to support the economic, political and social development of the country's regions.

Universidade Paulista

unip.br

A UNIP promove, em todas as áreas da educação, a formação atualizada dos alunos e sua capacitação para uma sociedade em constante mudança, por meio de um ensino de qualidade, tecnologicamente avançado e dirigido para o futuro. Sua finalidade maior é promover o desenvolvimento do potencial dos alunos, estimulando o senso crítico, intelectual e criativo, além de promover condições que possibilitem uma inserção ativa no mercado de trabalho. Nosso foco também está direcionado para os programas de pós-graduação, pois são de suma importância o aprimoramento e a continuidade na formação acadêmica. Dedicamos especial atenção ao corpo docente, assim como ao atendimento às necessidades da comunidade em geral, já que, além de formar profissionais em todas as áreas, de desenvolver pesquisas para gerar descobertas científicas e inovações tecnológicas, a UNIP propõe-se a cumprir as exigências apresentadas pelo mundo moderno. Assim, a Universidade Paulista vem sendo reconhecida como um importante centro de produção de conhecimento e de difusão de ensino de qualidade.

Virginia Tech

vt.edu

Dedicated to its motto, Ut Prosim (That I May Serve), Virginia Tech takes a hands-on, engaging approach to education, preparing scholars to be leaders in their fields and communities. As the commonwealth’s most comprehensive university and its leading research institution, Virginia Tech offers 215 undergraduate and graduate degree programs to 31,000 students and manages a research portfolio of $450 million. The university fulfills its land-grant mission of transforming knowledge to practice through technological leadership and by fueling economic growth and job creation locally, regionally, and across Virginia.

Loading…

NEWS

BeBoulder CyberSecurity News

Latest updates, reports, and threat intel affecting the global network.

Loading…

CVE

Latest

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-77684

SUMMARY

The Bluetooth Classic Hands-Free Profile HF role in subsys/bluetooth/host/classic/hfp_hf.c does not release the AT command buffers that are still queued on hf->tx_pending when the RFCOMM DLC goes down. hfp_hf_disconnected() only cancelled the work items and cleared hf->acl, and no other code path ever dequeues those buffers, so each one is permanently lost from the fixed hf_pool (CONFIG_BT_MAX_CONN + 1 buffers, i.e. two in the default configuration). The same function also left BT_HFP_HF_FLAG_CONNECTED set, and hfp_hf_create() wiped the object with memset() as soon as hf->acl was NULL, without checking whether hf->work, hf->slc_work or hf->deferred_work was still pending or running. The remote Audio Gateway peer controls the trigger end to end and needs no application involvement: an unsolicited +BCS: 1 response makes bcs_handle() call bt_hfp_hf_select_codec() and queue an AT+BCS buffer, which cannot be transmitted while BT_HFP_HF_FLAG_RX_ONGOING is set, and an immediately following RFCOMM DISC strands that buffer. Repeating the connect / +BCS / disconnect cycle a couple of times empties hf_pool for good. With the pool exhausted, HFP command sending fails permanently, and because hfp_hf_send_cmd() allocates with K_FOREVER (bt_rfcomm_create_pdu() → bt_conn_create_pdu()) from the Bluetooth RX context — where that timeout is not downgraded to K_NO_WAIT — one further +BCS from the peer parks the Bluetooth RX thread inside net_buf_alloc() with no possible waker, halting all HCI event processing until the device is rebooted. Separately, reusing the HF slot while a work handler was still queued or running allowed memset() to wipe live k_work items out from under the system workqueue, corrupting shared kernel workqueue state. Exploitation requires an established HFP session (for SSP devices L2CAP enforces authentication before the RFCOMM channel is reachable) and a build with CONFIG_BT_HFP_HF enabled.

Published

Date2026-10-19

Updated

Date2026-10-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)

cvss3

Base Score: 5.7

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Impact Score

3.6

Exploitability

2.1

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-19595

SUMMARY

The user-mode syscall verifier z_vrfy_rtio_cqe_get_mempool_buffer() in subsys/rtio/rtio_syscalls.c validated its two output parameters, buff and buff_len, with K_SYSCALL_MEMORY_READ() rather than K_SYSCALL_MEMORY_WRITE(). Both are pure out-parameters: z_impl_rtio_cqe_get_mempool_buffer() stores the mempool buffer address and its length through them. The distinction is enforced by every architecture validator — arch_buffer_validate() on RISC-V PMP explicitly accepts the global __rom_region/__rodata_region for reads only, and the ARM MPU validators accept P_RO_U_RO and P_RW_U_RO regions for reads only — so a read-validated pointer is not necessarily writable by the calling thread. An unprivileged user-mode thread that has been granted access to an RTIO context (rtio_access_grant()) can invoke the rtio_cqe_get_mempool_buffer() syscall with buff/buff_len pointing at memory it may read but not write, and with a completion-queue entry whose flags field it fully controls (only RTIO_CQE_FLAG_MEMPOOL_BUFFER in flags[7:0] is required; flags[19:8] and flags[31:20] supply the block index and count). The kernel then performs a pointer-sized and a 4-byte store through those addresses while running in supervisor mode. Reaching the store requires CONFIG_USERSPACE together with CONFIG_RTIO_SYS_MEM_BLOCKS, the configuration behind RTIO_DEFINE_WITH_MEMPOOL; without the latter the implementation returns -ENOTSUP and writes nothing. Two outcomes follow. If the target lies in a memory-domain partition declared K_MEM_PARTITION_P_RW_U_RO (privileged read-write, user read-only), the kernel-mode store succeeds and deposits partly attacker-chosen values into memory the memory domain had marked read-only for that thread, bypassing the partition's write protection. If the target lies in globally readable but unwritable memory such as .text/.rodata in flash, the store faults in kernel mode; the fault is delivered to z_fatal_error() and the default k_sys_fatal_error_handler() halts or reboots the device, giving an unprivileged thread a reliable full denial of service. The read-permission check does bound the damage: the address must still be readable by the calling thread, so kernel-private memory cannot be targeted and no confidential data is disclosed. The fix replaces both checks with K_SYSCALL_MEMORY_WRITE(), so a thread lacking write permission is terminated by K_OOPS before the implementation runs; the cqe argument correctly remains read-validated.

Published

Date2026-10-19

Updated

Date2026-10-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.1)

cvss3

Base Score: 6.1

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H

Impact Score

4.2

Exploitability

1.8

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-19178

SUMMARY

IBM Storage TS4500 Library 1.1.1.6 through 1.12.0.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to gain unauthorized administrative privileges due to a race condition.

Published

Date2026-10-19

Updated

Date2026-10-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.8)

cvss3

Base Score: 6.8

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Impact Score

5.2

Exploitability

1.6

REFERENCES

https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7292610

CVE-2026-112991

SUMMARY

The html_to_markdown expansion module in MISP Modules contains a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in its is_safe_url() URL validation function. The BLOCKED_RANGES list used to reject unsafe destination addresses was incomplete, omitting several critical IP address ranges. Specifically, the following ranges were not blocked: 0.0.0.0/8 (unspecified, which routes to loopback on Linux), 100.64.0.0/10 (carrier-grade NAT per RFC 6598), ::/128 (IPv6 unspecified), fc00::/7 (IPv6 Unique Local Addresses), and fe80::/10 (IPv6 link-local). The existing list only covered IPv4 loopback (127.0.0.0/8), RFC 1918 private ranges, IPv4 link-local (169.254.0.0/16), and IPv6 loopback (::1/128). An authenticated user with the ability to create or modify MISP attributes that trigger the html_to_markdown expansion module could supply URLs pointing to these unblocked internal address ranges. Because the module fetches the URL server-side to convert HTML content to Markdown, the request is made from the MISP server's network context. This allows an attacker to probe and read responses from internal services, carrier-grade NAT infrastructure, or link-local endpoints that would otherwise be unreachable from external networks. IPv4-mapped IPv6 forms (e.g., [::ffff:0.0.0.0]) also bypassed the existing checks. The security impact is primarily confidentiality: an attacker can read data served by internal services reachable from the MISP server. The MISP instance itself is not compromised, but it is abused as a proxy to access otherwise restricted network resources.

Published

Date2026-10-19

Updated

Date2026-10-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 6.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

https://github.com/misp/misp-modules/commit/98a1c2c2f297665dd8d4609e9cd644007a57516b

CVE-2026-112372

SUMMARY

A weakness has been identified in H3C Magic NX15 V100R017. This affects the function importprofile of the file /api/upload. This manipulation of the argument fileName causes path traversal. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure.

Published

Date2026-10-19

Updated

Date2026-10-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)

cvss2

Base Score: 5.8

Complexity: LOW

AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:P/I:P/A:P

cvss3

Base Score: 6.6

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

cvss4

Base Score: 2.0

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

3.7

Exploitability

2.3

REFERENCES

Loading…

API

Access Data Using Our API

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?
linkedin_id=axa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

Try It API Documentation Rapid

MEASURE

What Do We Measure ?

Incident

Finding

Grade

Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network SecurityIdentify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat IntelligenceLeverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Rankiteo

By Rankiteo

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

View on G2.com

Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.

View latest plans →View all security reports →

MILESTONEG

Users
Love Us

Loading…

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

BeBoulder Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

BeBoulder A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

BeBoulder CyberSecurity News & History

BeBoulder Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Incident Predictions locked

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Underwriter Stats for BeBoulder

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

Incident Types BeBoulder vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

Incident History - BeBoulder (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BeBoulder Subsidiaries

BeBoulder

BeBoulder Similar Companies

Washington University in St. Louis

UC Irvine

Brigham Young University

New York University

University of Colorado Boulder

USP - Universidade de São Paulo

Tecnológico de Monterrey

Universidade Paulista

Virginia Tech

BeBoulder CyberSecurity News

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Access Data Using Our API

What Do We Measure ?

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Rankiteo

BeBoulder CyberSecurity News & History

BeBoulder Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Incident Predictions locked

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Underwriter Stats for BeBoulder

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

Incident Types BeBoulder vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

Incident History - BeBoulder (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BeBoulder Subsidiaries

BeBoulder

BeBoulder Similar Companies

Washington University in St. Louis

UC Irvine

Brigham Young University

New York University

University of Colorado Boulder

USP - Universidade de São Paulo

Tecnológico de Monterrey

Universidade Paulista

Virginia Tech

BeBoulder CyberSecurity News

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Access Data Using Our API

What Do We Measure ?

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Rankiteo