Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Beacon Pointe » PATMERBEA1772527560

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (PATMERBEA1772527560)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-99
Company Score Before Incident488 / 1000
Company Score After Incident389 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERPATMERBEA1772527560
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSED641,000 records
INCIDENT DATE01/03/2026
STATUSpublished

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Beacon Pointe's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Beacon Pointe Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Beacon Pointe breach identified under incident ID PATMERBEA1772527560.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Beacon Pointe's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/beacon-pointe-ria, the number of followers: 9501, the industry type: Financial Services and the number of employees: 712 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 488 and after the incident was 389 with a difference of -99 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Beacon Pointe and their customers.

Pathstone Family Office recently reported "ShinyHunters Claims Breach of Elite Wealth Firm Pathstone Family Office", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

Cyber extortion group ShinyHunters has alleged a breach of Pathstone Family Office, a wealth management firm serving high-net-worth clients.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing 641,000 records, with nearly 641,000 records at risk.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

Overall, the incident is a reminder of why proactive monitoring and strong governance matter.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating shinyHunters has targeted other financial advisory firms and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating no details on attack vector; common in financial breaches. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating 641,000 records exfiltrated; likely credential misuse and Brute Force (T1110) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating shinyHunters linked to past breaches; brute force plausible. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating 641,000 records exfiltrated, including PII and documents and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating legal paperwork, estate planning, client contracts compromised. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating data exfiltration confirmed; 641,000 records stolen and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating shinyHunters posts data on dark web leak sites. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating extortion motive; no ransomware details but plausible and Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating risk of fraud, impersonation, intellectual property theft. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Valid Accounts (60%)
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Credential Access
Unsecured Credentials (70%)
Brute Force (50%)
Collection
Data from Local System (90%)
Data from Information Repositories (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (80%)
Exfiltration Over Web Service (60%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (30%)
Stored Data Manipulation (40%)