Comparison Overview
Bath & Body Works
Bath & Body Works
Columbus, Ohio, US, 43068
Last Update: 14/09/2026
We were founded on a simple idea: to make the world a brighter, happier place through the power of fragrance. As we've grown, so has our purpose and today, we help the world live more fully through the power of fragrance. We’re a team that cares about our customers and...
Coppel
República 2855 pte, Recursos Hidráulicos, Culiacan, Sinaloa, MX, 80105
Last Update: 14/09/2026
Coppel es una empresa mexicana con sede en la ciudad de Culiacán, que ha sido fundada en 1941. Es una cadena comercial de tiendas departamentales de ventas a través del otorgamiento de créditos con pocos requisitos, y repartos gratuitos. En la actualidad cuenta con mas ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Bath & Body Works
Coppel
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Bath & Body Works in 2026.
Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Coppel in 2026.
Incident History - Bath & Body Works (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Bath & Body Works cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Coppel (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Coppel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Bath & Body Works
Coppel
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.