Comparison Overview
Barrick Pueblo Viejo

Barrick Pueblo Viejo
None, None, Sánchez Ramírez, None, DO, None
Last Update: 15/01/2026
El yacimiento de Pueblo Viejo se encuentra en la República Dominicana, aproximadamente a 100 kilómetros al noroeste de la ciudad de Santo Domingo. Es manejado comercialmente por Pueblo Viejo Dominicana Jersey 2 Limited, una empresa conjunta entre las mineras Barrick Go...

AngloGold Ashanti
Greenwood Village, Denver, 80111, US
Last Update: 15/06/2026
AngloGold Ashanti plc is a global gold mining company with a diverse, high-quality portfolio of operations, projects and exploration activities across 10 countries on four continents. We pursue value-creating opportunities involving other minerals, where we can leverage...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Barrick Pueblo Viejo







AngloGold Ashanti






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Mining Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Barrick Pueblo Viejo in 2026.
Incidents vs Mining Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for AngloGold Ashanti in 2026.
Incident History - Barrick Pueblo Viejo (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Barrick Pueblo Viejo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - AngloGold Ashanti (X = Date, Y = Severity)
AngloGold Ashanti cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Barrick Pueblo Viejo

AngloGold Ashanti
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.