Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Barrett Industries » BAR1765887231

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (BAR1765887231)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-145
Company Score Before Incident751 / 1000
Company Score After Incident606 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERBAR1765887231
Type of Cyber IncidentRansomware
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDPersonal and sensitive information
INCIDENT DATE14/12/2025
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Barrett Industries's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Barrett Industries Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Barrett Industries breach identified under incident ID BAR1765887231.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Barrett Industries's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/barrett-industries, the number of followers: 4205, the industry type: Construction and the number of employees: 125 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 751 and after the incident was 606 with a difference of -145 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Barrett Industries and their customers.

Rockrose Development recently reported "Rockrose Development Data Breach", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

Rockrose Development confirmed a data breach in July 2025 that compromised personal information of residents and employees.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Personal and sensitive information, with nearly 47392 records at risk.

In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Victim notification.

The case underscores how Ongoing, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering 24 months of free identity protection through Experian (enrollment deadline: March 31, 2026).

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating attack_vector not specified, but common in ransomware incidents and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating disruption of payroll/billing systems suggests account compromise. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Credentials from Password Stores (T1555) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating online account credentials compromised in breach and Brute Force (T1110) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating common ransomware precursor, no specific evidence. Under the Discovery tactic, the analysis identified Account Discovery (T1087) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating payroll/accounting/tax documents targeted in exfiltration and File and Directory Discovery (T1083) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating documents related to clients, budget, payroll stolen. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating 47,392 records exfiltrated including SSNs, financial data and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating client/payroll/accounting documents stolen. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating play gang uses double-extortion tactic with data exfiltration. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attack with unspecified encryption and Service Stoppage (T1489) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating disruption of payroll, billing, communication systems. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Obfuscated Files or Information (T1027) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating common ransomware tactic, no specific evidence. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Valid Accounts (70%)
Credential Access
Credentials from Password Stores (60%)
Brute Force (50%)
Discovery
Account Discovery (70%)
File and Directory Discovery (80%)
Collection
Data from Local System (90%)
Data from Information Repositories (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (90%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (90%)
Service Stoppage (80%)
Defense Evasion
Obfuscated Files or Information (60%)

Sources & References