Barracuda
Company Details
Linkedin ID:
barracuda-networks
Website:
Employees number:
2,214
Number of followers:
78,325
NAICS:
541514
Industry Type:
Homepage:
barracuda.com
IP Addresses:
0
Company ID:
BAR_2454649
Scan Status:
In-progress
Barracuda Company CyberSecurity Posture
barracuda.com
Barracuda is a leading global cybersecurity company providing complete protection against complex threats for all size business. Our AI-powered BarracudaONE platform secures email, data, applications and networks with innovative solutions, managed XDR and a centralized dashboard to maximize protection and strengthen cyber resilience. Trusted by hundreds of thousands of IT professionals and managed service providers worldwide, Barracuda delivers powerful defenses that are easy to buy, deploy and use.
Barracuda A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
Barracuda Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 700 and 749
Barracuda
Updated:
- Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
- Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
Barracuda Global Score (TPRM)XXXX
Barracuda
- Instant access to detailed risk factors
- Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
- Vulnerabilities
- Findings
Barracuda Company CyberSecurity News & History
Past Incidents
2
Attack Types
2
Barracuda Networks, Inc.
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: In 2018, **Barracuda Networks, Inc.** experienced a data breach that exposed **protected health information (PHI)** of patients belonging to **Zoll Services LLC**, a subsidiary of Zoll Medical Corporation. The breach occurred due to vulnerabilities in Barracuda’s email archiving services, which were resold to Zoll via a third-party vendor, **Fusion, LLC**. The exposed PHI included sensitive patient data, leading to a **class-action lawsuit** against Zoll. While Zoll settled with affected customers, the legal dispute extended to Barracuda, with **Axis Insurance Company** (acting as Zoll’s assignee and Fusion’s subrogee) filing tort and contract claims. The court ultimately ruled in favor of Barracuda, dismissing claims of **equitable indemnification, breach of contract, and breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing** due to lack of evidence proving derivative liability or contractual obligations. The breach highlighted gaps in **third-party risk management** and **HIPAA compliance**, particularly regarding subcontractor safeguards for PHI.
Barracuda: .NET Framework Vulnerability SOAPwn: Impact on Enterprise Applications
Vulnerability
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization's existence
Description: **New .NET Framework Vulnerability "SOAPwn" Exposes Enterprises to Remote Code Execution Risks** Security researchers at **WatchTowr Labs** have uncovered a critical vulnerability in the **.NET Framework**, dubbed **"SOAPwn"**, which enables **remote code execution (RCE)** through an **invalid cast flaw** in serialization processes. The vulnerability poses a severe threat to enterprise infrastructure, with known impacts on applications such as **Barracuda Service Center RMM, Ivanti Endpoint Manager (EPM), and Umbraco 8**. However, due to the widespread use of .NET in enterprise environments, the risk extends across multiple industries. The flaw stems from improper type handling during .NET serialization, allowing attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable systems. Successful exploitation could lead to **full system compromise**, exposing sensitive data and disrupting critical operations. Organizations using affected applications are urged to **monitor vendor advisories** and apply patches immediately. Additional mitigation strategies include **code audits, network segmentation, and enhanced security monitoring** via IDS and SIEM tools. The discovery underscores the need for **proactive vulnerability management** and collaboration with security researchers to address emerging threats.
Barracuda Company Scoring based on AI Models
Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
Underwriter Stats for Barracuda
Incidents vs Computer and Network Security Industry Average (This Year)
Barracuda has 53.85% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)
Barracuda has 29.87% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident Types Barracuda vs Computer and Network Security Industry Avg (This Year)
Barracuda reported 1 incidents this year: 0 cyber attacks, 0 ransomware, 1 vulnerabilities, 0 data breaches, compared to industry peers with at least 1 incident.
Incident History — Barracuda (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Barracuda cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
Barracuda Company Subsidiaries
Barracuda is a leading global cybersecurity company providing complete protection against complex threats for all size business. Our AI-powered BarracudaONE platform secures email, data, applications and networks with innovative solutions, managed XDR and a centralized dashboard to maximize protection and strengthen cyber resilience. Trusted by hundreds of thousands of IT professionals and managed service providers worldwide, Barracuda delivers powerful defenses that are easy to buy, deploy and use.
Loading...
Barracuda Similar Companies
NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS
## Our core business We manage linux / unix server infrastructures and build the efficient and secure networking environments using hardware cutting edge technologies suited to the needs of the project and the client. We believe in quality, opposed to quantity. Our company consists of highly
CrowdStrike
CrowdStrike (Nasdaq: CRWD), a global cybersecurity leader, has redefined modern security with the world’s most advanced cloud-native platform for protecting critical areas of enterprise risk — endpoints and cloud workloads, identity and data. Powered by the CrowdStrike Security Cloud and world-clas
Palo Alto Networks, the global cybersecurity leader, is shaping the cloud-centric future with technology that is transforming the way people and organizations operate. Our mission is to be the cybersecurity partner of choice, protecting our digital way of life. We help address the world's greatest s
.png)
Barracuda CyberSecurity News
November 28, 2025 05:00 AM
Infosec products of the month: November 2025
The featured infosec products this month are from 1touch.io, Action1, Barracuda Networks, Bedrock Data, Bitdefender, and more.
November 25, 2025 05:12 AM
Staying open for business and closed off to cyberattacks
The retail sector continues to face heightened cyber risk as the industry becomes increasingly digital.
November 21, 2025 01:06 AM
Defence wins Premierships: What sports teach us about cybersecurity
Barracuda's Managed XDR cybersecurity uses a premiership-style defence approach, aligning threat response like an elite footy team's...
November 18, 2025 01:17 AM
Sinobi: The bougie-exclusive ransomware group that wants to be a ninja
Sinobi is a sophisticated ransomware group that operates as a hybrid ransomware-as-a-service (RaaS) organization.
November 17, 2025 10:55 AM
Frontline security predictions 2026: The battle for reality and control in a world of agentic AI
A look at how agentic AI will transform cyber threats and defenses in 2026.
November 07, 2025 08:00 AM
Barracuda unveils AI assistant to boost security team efficiency
Barracuda Networks launches Barracuda Assistant, an AI tool boosting security teams' efficiency amid rising cyberattack complexity and...
November 05, 2025 08:00 AM
Barracuda Launches AI Assistant to Streamline Security Operations for MSPs and Enterprises
Barracuda's new AI-powered assistant helps MSPs and IT teams streamline threat investigations, reduce errors, and manage multiple...
November 05, 2025 08:00 AM
New Barracuda Assistant Transforms Security Operations
Barracuda Assistant, powered by Barracuda AI, accelerates security operations by enabling customers and MSPs to quickly and easily navigate...
November 05, 2025 08:00 AM
Barracuda Assistant accelerates security operations
Barracuda Networks launched Barracuda Assistant, powered by Barracuda AI. Integrated into the BarracudaONE cybersecurity platform, Barracuda...
Frequently Asked Questions
Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.
Barracuda CyberSecurity History Information
Official Website of Barracuda
The official website of Barracuda is http://www.barracuda.com.
Barracuda’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score
According to Rankiteo, Barracuda’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 749, reflecting their Moderate security posture.
How many security badges does Barracuda’ have ?
According to Rankiteo, Barracuda currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.
Does Barracuda have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Barracuda is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.
Does Barracuda have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Barracuda does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
Does Barracuda comply with GDPR ?
According to Rankiteo, Barracuda is not listed as GDPR compliant.
Does Barracuda have PCI DSS certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Barracuda does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.
Does Barracuda comply with HIPAA ?
According to Rankiteo, Barracuda is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.
Does Barracuda have ISO 27001 certification ?
According to Rankiteo,Barracuda is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.
Industry Classification of Barracuda
Barracuda operates primarily in the Computer and Network Security industry.
Number of Employees at Barracuda
Barracuda employs approximately 2,214 people worldwide.
Subsidiaries Owned by Barracuda
Barracuda presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.
Barracuda’s LinkedIn Followers
Barracuda’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 78,325 followers.
NAICS Classification of Barracuda
Barracuda is classified under the NAICS code 541514, which corresponds to Others.
Barracuda’s Presence on Crunchbase
Yes, Barracuda has an official profile on Crunchbase, which can be accessed here: https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/barracuda-networks.
Barracuda’s Presence on LinkedIn
Yes, Barracuda maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/barracuda-networks.
Cybersecurity Incidents Involving Barracuda
As of December 12, 2025, Rankiteo reports that Barracuda has experienced 2 cybersecurity incidents.
Number of Peer and Competitor Companies
Barracuda has an estimated 3,079 peer or competitor companies worldwide.
What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at Barracuda ?
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Vulnerability and Breach.
How does Barracuda detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an containment measures with network segmentation to minimize attack surface, and remediation measures with patch management, code review, and testing, and network segmentation with implemented to contain potential breaches, and enhanced monitoring with use of ids and siem tools to track unauthorized activities..
Incident Details
Can you provide details on each incident ?
Title: Barracuda Networks Data Breach (2018) Exposing Zoll Services' Protected Health Information (PHI)
Description: A 2018 data breach at Barracuda Networks exposed the protected health information (PHI) of patients of Zoll Services LLC, a subsidiary of Zoll Medical Corporation. The breach occurred due to vulnerabilities in Barracuda's email archiving services, which were resold to Zoll by Fusion LLC under an OEM agreement. The lack of proper liability limitations and indemnification clauses in Fusion's contract with Zoll, as required by the OEM agreement, led to legal disputes. Zoll settled a class-action lawsuit with affected customers, and its insurer, Axis Insurance Company, sought indemnification from Barracuda, which was ultimately denied by the courts due to insufficient evidence of a derivative or vicarious liability relationship.
Type: Data Breach
Title: SOAPwn: Invalid Cast Vulnerability in .NET Framework
Description: Security researchers from WatchTowr Labs identified a new threat affecting the .NET Framework, designated as 'SOAPwn.' This vulnerability, described as an 'invalid cast vulnerability,' poses significant risks to enterprise infrastructure by potentially enabling remote code execution (RCE). Applications such as Barracuda Service Center RMM, Ivanti Endpoint Manager (EPM), and Umbraco 8 are known to be affected, but the scope extends to a broader range of vendors.
Type: Vulnerability Exploitation
Attack Vector: Remote Exploitation
Vulnerability Exploited: Invalid cast vulnerability in .NET Framework serialization processes
What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?
Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Breach.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the impact of each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach BAR5995259112525
Data Compromised: Protected health information (phi) of zoll services' patients
Systems Affected: Barracuda Networks' email archiving services
Customer Complaints: ["Class-action lawsuit filed by Zoll's affected customers"]
Legal Liabilities: Zoll settled with customers; Axis Insurance (as Zoll’s assignee and Fusion’s subrogee) filed tort and contract claims against Barracuda, which were dismissed on summary judgment
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation BAR1765454547
Systems Affected: Enterprise applications relying on .NET Framework
Operational Impact: Potential disruption of critical business operations or service delivery
Identity Theft Risk: Potential risk due to sensitive data exposure
What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Protected Health Information (Phi), and Sensitive data.
Which entities were affected by each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach BAR5995259112525
Entity Name: Zoll Services LLC
Entity Type: Subsidiary
Industry: Healthcare (Medical Devices)
Customers Affected: Patients whose PHI was exposed (exact number unspecified)
Incident : Data Breach BAR5995259112525
Entity Name: Zoll Medical Corporation
Entity Type: Parent Company
Industry: Healthcare (Medical Devices)
Incident : Data Breach BAR5995259112525
Entity Name: Fusion, LLC
Entity Type: Service Provider
Industry: Data Security Services
Incident : Data Breach BAR5995259112525
Entity Name: Barracuda Networks, Inc.
Entity Type: Technology Provider
Industry: Cybersecurity (Email Archiving Services)
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation BAR1765454547
Entity Name: Barracuda Service Center RMM
Entity Type: Application
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation BAR1765454547
Entity Name: Ivanti Endpoint Manager (EPM)
Entity Type: Application
Response to the Incidents
What measures were taken in response to each incident ?
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation BAR1765454547
Containment Measures: Network segmentation to minimize attack surface
Remediation Measures: Patch management, code review, and testing
Network Segmentation: Implemented to contain potential breaches
Enhanced Monitoring: Use of IDS and SIEM tools to track unauthorized activities
Data Breach Information
What type of data was compromised in each breach ?
Incident : Data Breach BAR5995259112525
Type of Data Compromised: Protected health information (phi)
Sensitivity of Data: High (Healthcare data subject to HIPAA)
Data Exfiltration: Yes (exposed to unauthorized third party)
Personally Identifiable Information: Yes (PHI includes PII)
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation BAR1765454547
Type of Data Compromised: Sensitive data
Sensitivity of Data: High
What measures does the company take to prevent data exfiltration ?
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: Patch management, code review, and testing.
How does the company handle incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) ?
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through by network segmentation to minimize attack surface.
Regulatory Compliance
Were there any regulatory violations and fines imposed for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach BAR5995259112525
Regulations Violated: Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA),
Legal Actions: Class-action lawsuit against Zoll by affected customers (settled), Axis Insurance (as Zoll’s assignee and Fusion’s subrogee) filed tort and contract claims against Barracuda (dismissed on summary judgment),
How does the company ensure compliance with regulatory requirements ?
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through Class-action lawsuit against Zoll by affected customers (settled), Axis Insurance (as Zoll’s assignee and Fusion’s subrogee) filed tort and contract claims against Barracuda (dismissed on summary judgment), .
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What lessons were learned from each incident ?
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation BAR1765454547
Lessons Learned: Vulnerabilities like SOAPwn highlight the necessity for a robust and adaptable security posture. Enterprises need to ensure their development and deployment frameworks are hardened against such threats.
What recommendations were made to prevent future incidents ?
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation BAR1765454547
Recommendations: Monitor advisories from affected vendors and deploy patches as soon as they are released., Conduct thorough audits and testing in environments relying on the .NET Framework to identify susceptible components., Implement network segmentation to minimize attack surface., Use intrusion detection systems (IDS) and security information and event management (SIEM) tools effectively., Keep cybersecurity policies up-to-date and foster a culture of security awareness among development teams., Perform regular vulnerability assessments and collaborate with security researchers.Monitor advisories from affected vendors and deploy patches as soon as they are released., Conduct thorough audits and testing in environments relying on the .NET Framework to identify susceptible components., Implement network segmentation to minimize attack surface., Use intrusion detection systems (IDS) and security information and event management (SIEM) tools effectively., Keep cybersecurity policies up-to-date and foster a culture of security awareness among development teams., Perform regular vulnerability assessments and collaborate with security researchers.Monitor advisories from affected vendors and deploy patches as soon as they are released., Conduct thorough audits and testing in environments relying on the .NET Framework to identify susceptible components., Implement network segmentation to minimize attack surface., Use intrusion detection systems (IDS) and security information and event management (SIEM) tools effectively., Keep cybersecurity policies up-to-date and foster a culture of security awareness among development teams., Perform regular vulnerability assessments and collaborate with security researchers.Monitor advisories from affected vendors and deploy patches as soon as they are released., Conduct thorough audits and testing in environments relying on the .NET Framework to identify susceptible components., Implement network segmentation to minimize attack surface., Use intrusion detection systems (IDS) and security information and event management (SIEM) tools effectively., Keep cybersecurity policies up-to-date and foster a culture of security awareness among development teams., Perform regular vulnerability assessments and collaborate with security researchers.Monitor advisories from affected vendors and deploy patches as soon as they are released., Conduct thorough audits and testing in environments relying on the .NET Framework to identify susceptible components., Implement network segmentation to minimize attack surface., Use intrusion detection systems (IDS) and security information and event management (SIEM) tools effectively., Keep cybersecurity policies up-to-date and foster a culture of security awareness among development teams., Perform regular vulnerability assessments and collaborate with security researchers.Monitor advisories from affected vendors and deploy patches as soon as they are released., Conduct thorough audits and testing in environments relying on the .NET Framework to identify susceptible components., Implement network segmentation to minimize attack surface., Use intrusion detection systems (IDS) and security information and event management (SIEM) tools effectively., Keep cybersecurity policies up-to-date and foster a culture of security awareness among development teams., Perform regular vulnerability assessments and collaborate with security researchers.
What are the key lessons learned from past incidents ?
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are Vulnerabilities like SOAPwn highlight the necessity for a robust and adaptable security posture. Enterprises need to ensure their development and deployment frameworks are hardened against such threats.
What recommendations has the company implemented to improve cybersecurity ?
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: Perform regular vulnerability assessments and collaborate with security researchers., Implement network segmentation to minimize attack surface., Keep cybersecurity policies up-to-date and foster a culture of security awareness among development teams., Use intrusion detection systems (IDS) and security information and event management (SIEM) tools effectively., Monitor advisories from affected vendors and deploy patches as soon as they are released. and Conduct thorough audits and testing in environments relying on the .NET Framework to identify susceptible components..
References
Where can I find more information about each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach BAR5995259112525
Source: Axis Insurance Company v. Barracuda Networks, Inc., et al. (1st Circuit, 2025)
Date Accessed: 2025-11-20
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation BAR1765454547
Source: WatchTowr Labs
Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: Axis Insurance Company v. Barracuda Networks, Inc., et al. (1st Circuit, 2025)Date Accessed: 2025-11-20, and Source: WatchTowr Labs.
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the investigation for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach BAR5995259112525
Investigation Status: Resolved (Court affirmed summary judgment in favor of Barracuda)
Initial Access Broker
How did the initial access broker gain entry for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach BAR5995259112525
High Value Targets: Zoll Services' Phi,
Data Sold on Dark Web: Zoll Services' Phi,
Post-Incident Analysis
What were the root causes and corrective actions taken for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach BAR5995259112525
Root Causes: Failure Of Fusion To Include Required Limitation Of Liability And Indemnification Clauses In Its Contract With Zoll (As Mandated By The Oem Agreement With Barracuda), Lack Of Evidence That Fusion Ensured Barracuda’S Compliance With The Hipaa Business Associate Agreement (Baa), Barracuda’S Email Archiving Services Exposed Phi To Unauthorized Third Parties,
Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation BAR1765454547
Root Causes: Mismanagement of types within the .NET serialization processes
Corrective Actions: Patch management, code review, network segmentation, and enhanced monitoring
What is the company's process for conducting post-incident analysis ?
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as Use of IDS and SIEM tools to track unauthorized activities.
What corrective actions has the company taken based on post-incident analysis ?
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: Patch management, code review, network segmentation, and enhanced monitoring.
Additional Questions
Impact of the Incidents
What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were Protected Health Information (PHI) of Zoll Services' patients and .
What was the most significant system affected in an incident ?
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was Barracuda Networks' email archiving services and .
Response to the Incidents
What containment measures were taken in the most recent incident ?
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident was Network segmentation to minimize attack surface.
Data Breach Information
What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was Protected Health Information (PHI) of Zoll Services' patients.
Regulatory Compliance
What was the most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation ?
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was Class-action lawsuit against Zoll by affected customers (settled), Axis Insurance (as Zoll’s assignee and Fusion’s subrogee) filed tort and contract claims against Barracuda (dismissed on summary judgment), .
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What was the most significant lesson learned from past incidents ?
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was Vulnerabilities like SOAPwn highlight the necessity for a robust and adaptable security posture. Enterprises need to ensure their development and deployment frameworks are hardened against such threats.
What was the most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity ?
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was Perform regular vulnerability assessments and collaborate with security researchers., Implement network segmentation to minimize attack surface., Keep cybersecurity policies up-to-date and foster a culture of security awareness among development teams., Use intrusion detection systems (IDS) and security information and event management (SIEM) tools effectively., Monitor advisories from affected vendors and deploy patches as soon as they are released. and Conduct thorough audits and testing in environments relying on the .NET Framework to identify susceptible components..
References
What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident are WatchTowr Labs, Axis Insurance Company v. Barracuda Networks, Inc., et al. (1st Circuit and 2025).
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the most recent investigation ?
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is Resolved (Court affirmed summary judgment in favor of Barracuda).
Post-Incident Analysis
What was the most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis ?
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was Failure of Fusion to include required limitation of liability and indemnification clauses in its contract with Zoll (as mandated by the OEM agreement with Barracuda)Lack of evidence that Fusion ensured Barracuda’s compliance with the HIPAA Business Associate Agreement (BAA)Barracuda’s email archiving services exposed PHI to unauthorized third parties, Mismanagement of types within the .NET serialization processes.
What was the most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis ?
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was Patch management, code review, network segmentation, and enhanced monitoring.
.png)
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
LibreChat is a ChatGPT clone with additional features. In versions 0.8.0 and below, there is no handler for JSON parsing errors; SyntaxError from express.json() includes user input in the error message, which gets reflected in responses. User input (including HTML/JavaScript) can be exposed in error responses, creating an XSS risk if Content-Type isn't strictly enforced. This issue does not have a fix at the time of publication.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
LibreChat is a ChatGPT clone with additional features. In versions 0.8.0 and below, when creating prompts, JSON requests are sent to define and modify the prompts via PATCH endpoint for prompt groups (/api/prompts/groups/:groupId). However, the request bodies are not sufficiently validated for proper input, enabling users to modify prompts in a way that was not intended as part of the front end system. The patchPromptGroup function passes req.body directly to updatePromptGroup() without filtering sensitive fields. This issue is fixed in version 0.8.1.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
LibreChat is a ChatGPT clone with additional features. In versions 0.8.0 and below, when a user posts a question, the iconURL parameter of the POST request can be modified by an attacker. The malicious code is then stored in the chat which can then be shared to other users. When sharing chats with a potentially malicious “tracker”, resources loaded can lead to loss of privacy for users who view the chat link that is sent to them. This issue is fixed in version 0.8.1.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
MaxKB is an open-source AI assistant for enterprise. Versions 2.3.1 and below have improper file permissions which allow attackers to overwrite the built-in dynamic linker and other critical files, potentially resulting in privilege escalation. This issue is fixed in version 2.4.0.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description
MaxKB is an open-source AI assistant for enterprise. In versions 2.3.1 and below, the tool module allows an attacker to escape the sandbox environment and escalate privileges under certain concurrent conditions. This issue is fixed in version 2.4.0.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=barracuda-networks' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
RapidWhat Do We Measure ?
Incident
Finding
Grade
Digital Assets
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Network Security
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
CMDB (Configuration Management Database)
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Threat Intelligence
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
