Barracuda Company CyberSecurity Posture

barracuda.com
ISOSOC2 Type 1SOC2 Type 2PCI DSSHIPAAGDPR

Barracuda is a leading global cybersecurity company providing complete protection against complex threats for all size business. Our AI-powered BarracudaONE platform secures email, data, applications and networks with innovative solutions, managed XDR and a centralized dashboard to maximize protection and strengthen cyber resilience. Trusted by hundreds of thousands of IT professionals and managed service providers worldwide, Barracuda delivers powerful defenses that are easy to buy, deploy and use.

Barracuda A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Barracuda

Company Details

Linkedin ID:

barracuda-networks

Website:

http://www.barracuda.com

Employees number:

2,214

Number of followers:

78,325

NAICS:

541514

Industry Type:

Computer and Network Security

Homepage:

barracuda.com

IP Addresses:

Scan still pending

Company ID:

BAR_2454649

Scan Status:

In-progress

AI scoreBarracuda Risk Score (AI oriented)

Between 700 and 749

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/barracuda-networks.jpeg
Barracuda Computer and Network Security
Updated:
  • Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
  • Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
globalscoreBarracuda Global Score (TPRM)

XXXX

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/barracuda-networks.jpeg
Barracuda Computer and Network Security
  • Instant access to detailed risk factors
  • Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
  • Vulnerabilities
  • Findings

Barracuda

Moderate
Current Score
749
Ba (Moderate)
01000
2 incidents
-1.0 avg impact

Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.

DECEMBER 2025
750
Vulnerability
11 Dec 2025 • Barracuda: .NET Framework Vulnerability SOAPwn: Impact on Enterprise Applications
SOAPwn: Invalid Cast Vulnerability in .NET Framework

**New .NET Framework Vulnerability "SOAPwn" Exposes Enterprises to Remote Code Execution Risks** Security researchers at **WatchTowr Labs** have uncovered a critical vulnerability in the **.NET Framework**, dubbed **"SOAPwn"**, which enables **remote code execution (RCE)** through an **invalid cast flaw** in serialization processes. The vulnerability poses a severe threat to enterprise infrastructure, with known impacts on applications such as **Barracuda Service Center RMM, Ivanti Endpoint Manager (EPM), and Umbraco 8**. However, due to the widespread use of .NET in enterprise environments, the risk extends across multiple industries. The flaw stems from improper type handling during .NET serialization, allowing attackers to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable systems. Successful exploitation could lead to **full system compromise**, exposing sensitive data and disrupting critical operations. Organizations using affected applications are urged to **monitor vendor advisories** and apply patches immediately. Additional mitigation strategies include **code audits, network segmentation, and enhanced security monitoring** via IDS and SIEM tools. The discovery underscores the need for **proactive vulnerability management** and collaboration with security researchers to address emerging threats.

749
critical -1
BAR1765454547
Incident Details -
Type
Vulnerability Exploitation
Attack Vector
Remote Exploitation
Vulnerability Exploited
Invalid cast vulnerability in .NET Framework serialization processes
Impact
Systems Affected: Enterprise applications relying on .NET Framework Operational Impact: Potential disruption of critical business operations or service delivery Identity Theft Risk: Potential risk due to sensitive data exposure
Response
Containment Measures: Network segmentation to minimize attack surface Remediation Measures: Patch management, code review, and testing Network Segmentation: Implemented to contain potential breaches Enhanced Monitoring: Use of IDS and SIEM tools to track unauthorized activities
Data Breach
Type Of Data Compromised: Sensitive data Sensitivity Of Data: High
Lessons Learned
Vulnerabilities like SOAPwn highlight the necessity for a robust and adaptable security posture. Enterprises need to ensure their development and deployment frameworks are hardened against such threats.
Recommendations
Monitor advisories from affected vendors and deploy patches as soon as they are released. Conduct thorough audits and testing in environments relying on the .NET Framework to identify susceptible components. Implement network segmentation to minimize attack surface. Use intrusion detection systems (IDS) and security information and event management (SIEM) tools effectively. Keep cybersecurity policies up-to-date and foster a culture of security awareness among development teams. Perform regular vulnerability assessments and collaborate with security researchers.
Post Incident Analysis
Root Causes: Mismanagement of types within the .NET serialization processes Corrective Actions: Patch management, code review, network segmentation, and enhanced monitoring
References
Blog URL Source URL
NOVEMBER 2025
750
OCTOBER 2025
750
SEPTEMBER 2025
750
AUGUST 2025
750
JULY 2025
749
JUNE 2025
749
MAY 2025
749
APRIL 2025
749
MARCH 2025
748
FEBRUARY 2025
748
JANUARY 2025
748
JUNE 2018
761
Breach
16 Jun 2018 • Barracuda Networks, Inc.
Barracuda Networks Data Breach (2018) Exposing Zoll Services' Protected Health Information (PHI)

In 2018, **Barracuda Networks, Inc.** experienced a data breach that exposed **protected health information (PHI)** of patients belonging to **Zoll Services LLC**, a subsidiary of Zoll Medical Corporation. The breach occurred due to vulnerabilities in Barracuda’s email archiving services, which were resold to Zoll via a third-party vendor, **Fusion, LLC**. The exposed PHI included sensitive patient data, leading to a **class-action lawsuit** against Zoll. While Zoll settled with affected customers, the legal dispute extended to Barracuda, with **Axis Insurance Company** (acting as Zoll’s assignee and Fusion’s subrogee) filing tort and contract claims. The court ultimately ruled in favor of Barracuda, dismissing claims of **equitable indemnification, breach of contract, and breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing** due to lack of evidence proving derivative liability or contractual obligations. The breach highlighted gaps in **third-party risk management** and **HIPAA compliance**, particularly regarding subcontractor safeguards for PHI.

703
critical -58
BAR5995259112525
Incident Details -
Type
Data Breach
Impact
Protected Health Information (PHI) of Zoll Services' patients Barracuda Networks' email archiving services Class-action lawsuit filed by Zoll's affected customers Zoll settled with customers; Axis Insurance (as Zoll’s assignee and Fusion’s subrogee) filed tort and contract claims against Barracuda, which were dismissed on summary judgment
Data Breach
Protected Health Information (PHI) Sensitivity Of Data: High (Healthcare data subject to HIPAA) Data Exfiltration: Yes (exposed to unauthorized third party) Personally Identifiable Information: Yes (PHI includes PII)
Regulatory Compliance
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) Class-action lawsuit against Zoll by affected customers (settled) Axis Insurance (as Zoll’s assignee and Fusion’s subrogee) filed tort and contract claims against Barracuda (dismissed on summary judgment)
Investigation Status
['Resolved (Court affirmed summary judgment in favor of Barracuda)']
Initial Access Broker
Zoll Services' PHI
Post Incident Analysis
Failure of Fusion to include required limitation of liability and indemnification clauses in its contract with Zoll (as mandated by the OEM agreement with Barracuda) Lack of evidence that Fusion ensured Barracuda’s compliance with the HIPAA Business Associate Agreement (BAA) Barracuda’s email archiving services exposed PHI to unauthorized third parties
References
Blog URL Source URL

Frequently Asked Questions

According to Rankiteo, the current A.I.-based Cyber Score for Barracuda is 749, which corresponds to a Moderate rating.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for November 2025 was 750.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for October 2025 was 750.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for September 2025 was 750.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for August 2025 was 750.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for July 2025 was 749.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for June 2025 was 749.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for May 2025 was 749.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for April 2025 was 749.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for March 2025 was 748.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for February 2025 was 748.

According to Rankiteo, the A.I. Rankiteo Cyber Score for January 2025 was 748.

Over the past 12 months, the average per-incident point impact on Barracuda’s A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score has been -1.0 points.

You can access Barracuda’s cyber incident details on Rankiteo by visiting the following link: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/barracuda-networks.

You can find the summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology on Rankiteo by visiting the following link: Rankiteo Algorithm.

You can view Barracuda’s profile page on Rankiteo by visiting the following link: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/barracuda-networks.

With scores of 18.5/20 from OpenAI ChatGPT, 20/20 from Mistral AI, and 17/20 from Claude AI, the A.I. Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology is validated as a market leader.