Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Barnes & Noble, Inc.Barnes & Noble, Inc.
VS
Foot LockerFoot Locker
Barnes & Noble, Inc.

Barnes & Noble, Inc.

33 E 17th St, New York, 10003, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
793/1000Fair

Barnes & Noble proudly serves America with approximately 600 bookstores across all fifty states, and are busy opening newly designed stores in communities nationwide. We are an innovator in publishing, retail, and digital media, including our award-winning NOOK® produ...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:14,232
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Foot Locker

Foot Locker

330 West 34th Street, New York City, New York, US, 10001

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
793/1000Fair

Foot Locker, Inc. is a leading footwear and apparel retailer that unlocks the “inner sneakerhead” in all of us. With approximately 2,500 retail stores in 26 countries across North America, Europe, Asia, Australia, and New Zealand, and a franchised store presence in the ...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:10,990
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Barnes & Noble, Inc.

Barnes & Noble, Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Foot Locker

Foot Locker

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Barnes & Noble, Inc. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Foot Locker in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Barnes & Noble, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Barnes & Noble, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Foot Locker (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Foot Locker cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Barnes & Noble, Inc.

Barnes & Noble, Inc.

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
BAR1003091725
Foot Locker

Foot Locker

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Barnes & Noble, Inc. company and Foot Locker company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Barnes & Noble, Inc. company and Foot Locker company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Barnes & Noble, Inc. company and Foot Locker company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Barnes & Noble, Inc. company and Foot Locker company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Barnes & Noble, Inc. company and Foot Locker company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Barnes & Noble, Inc. company and Foot Locker company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Barnes & Noble, Inc. company and Foot Locker company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Barnes & Noble, Inc. company and Foot Locker company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Barnes & Noble, Inc. company and Foot Locker company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Barnes & Noble, Inc. company and Foot Locker company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Barnes & Noble, Inc. company and Foot Locker company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Barnes & Noble, Inc. and Foot Locker, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Barnes & Noble, Inc. and Foot Locker, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Barnes & Noble, Inc. or Foot Locker ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Barnes & Noble, Inc. or Foot Locker ?
Between Barnes & Noble, Inc. and Foot Locker, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Barnes & Noble, Inc. and Foot Locker, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA