Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Axios » AXI1776083164

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (AXI1776083164)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-4
Company Score Before Incident754 / 1000
Company Score After Incident750 / 1000
Company LinkView Axios Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERAXI1776083164
Type of Cyber IncidentVulnerability
ATTACK VECTORServer-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), HTTP Request Smuggling, JavaScript Prototype Pollution
DATA EXPOSEDIAM session tokens, Sensitive metadata
INCIDENT DATE12/04/2026
STATUSpublished

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Axios's Vulnerability and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Axios Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Axios breach identified under incident ID AXI1776083164.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Axios's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/axios, the number of followers: 0, the industry type: Business Consulting and Services and the number of employees: 19 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 754 and after the incident was 750 with a difference of -4 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Axios and their customers.

A newly reported cybersecurity incident, "Critical Axios Vulnerability (CVE-2026-40175) Enables Cloud Infrastructure Compromise", has drawn attention.

A newly disclosed critical vulnerability in the widely used Axios HTTP client library (CVE-2026-40175, CVSS 9.9) exposes web applications and cloud environments to Remote Code Execution (RCE) and full infrastructure takeover.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Web applications, Cloud environments and Containerized/serverless systems, and exposing IAM session tokens and Sensitive metadata.

In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Upgrade to Axios version 1.15.0+, and began remediation that includes Enforce strict header validation and Audit dependencies for prototype pollution vectors.

The case underscores how and recommending next steps like Upgrade to Axios version 1.15.0+ and Audit dependencies for prototype pollution vectors.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating critical Axios Vulnerability (CVE-2026-40175) exposes web applications to RCE and Drive-by Compromise (T1189) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating no user interaction required for exploitation via Gadget Attack Chain. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Client Execution (T1203) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating remote Code Execution (RCE) via Axios vulnerability (CVE-2026-40175) and JavaScript (T1059.007) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating exploitation occurs via JavaScript prototype pollution in Axios. Under the Privilege Escalation tactic, the analysis identified Bypass User Account Control (T1548.002) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating bypasses AWS IMDSv2 protections to access IAM session tokens and Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating full cloud environment control via stolen IAM session tokens. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Cloud Instance Metadata API (T1552.005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating pUT request to AWS EC2 Metadata Service (169.254.169.254) steals IAM tokens and Steal Application Access Token (T1528) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating iAM session tokens compromised via metadata service abuse. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating unrestricted header processing and missing input sanitization and Valid Accounts: Cloud Accounts (T1078.004) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating stolen IAM tokens used to bypass authentication controls. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Cloud Storage (T1530) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating sensitive metadata exfiltrated from cloud environments. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating data exfiltration confirmed via compromised cloud credentials and Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating attack chain enables outbound request hijacking for exfiltration. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Resource Hijacking (T1496) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating full cloud environment control achieved via RCE. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (90%)
Drive-by Compromise (50%)
Execution
Exploitation for Client Execution (90%)
JavaScript (80%)
Privilege Escalation
Bypass User Account Control (70%)
Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (80%)
Credential Access
Cloud Instance Metadata API (90%)
Steal Application Access Token (90%)
Defense Evasion
Exploit Public-Facing Application (80%)
Valid Accounts: Cloud Accounts (70%)
Collection
Data from Cloud Storage (80%)
Exfiltration
Transfer Data to Cloud Account (70%)
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (60%)
Impact
Resource Hijacking (80%)

Sources & References