Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Axios » AXIGOO1775048584

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (AXIGOO1775048584)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-37
Company Score Before Incident738 / 1000
Company Score After Incident701 / 1000
Company LinkView Axios Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERAXIGOO1775048584
Type of Cyber IncidentCyber Attack
ATTACK VECTORCompromised developer account
DATA EXPOSEDPotential cryptocurrency theft
INCIDENT DATE30/03/2026
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Axios's Cyber Attack and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Axios Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Axios breach identified under incident ID AXIGOO1775048584.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Axios's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/axios-media, the number of followers: 77832, the industry type: Internet News and the number of employees: 619 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 738 and after the incident was 701 with a difference of -37 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Axios and their customers.

On 07 January 2025, Axios (software developer) disclosed Supply-Chain Attack issues under the banner "North Korean Hackers Target U.S. Firms in Supply-Chain Attack to Fund Nuclear Program".

A suspected North Korean hacking group compromised a software developer’s account tied to Axios, a widely used tool for connecting applications and web services, in a supply-chain attack aimed at stealing cryptocurrency.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Organizations using Axios software (cryptocurrency firms, blockchain developers, tech companies), and exposing Potential cryptocurrency theft.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

The case underscores how Ongoing.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Supply Chain (T1195.002) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including compromised a software developer’s account tied to Axios, and pushing malicious updates to organizations and Valid Accounts (T1078) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating attackers gained control of the developer’s account for three hours. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating pushing malicious updates to organizations that downloaded the software. Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating attackers gained control of the developer’s account for three hours. Under the Privilege Escalation tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating compromised a software developer’s account tied to Axios. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Supply Chain (T1195.002) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating pushing malicious updates to organizations via trusted software. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating attackers gained control of the developer’s account. Under the Lateral Movement tactic, the analysis identified Use Alternate Authentication Material: Pass the Hash (T1550.002) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating compromised developer account used to push updates to downstream orgs. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating aimed at stealing cryptocurrency from cryptocurrency firms. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating north Korean hackers...stealing cryptocurrency to fund nuclear program. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Resource Hijacking (T1496) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating stealing cryptocurrency to fund North Korea’s nuclear and missile programs. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Supply Chain (90%)
Valid Accounts (90%)
Execution
User Execution: Malicious File (80%)
Persistence
Valid Accounts (80%)
Privilege Escalation
Valid Accounts (70%)
Defense Evasion
Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Supply Chain (80%)
Credential Access
Valid Accounts (90%)
Lateral Movement
Use Alternate Authentication Material: Pass the Hash (50%)
Collection
Data from Information Repositories (70%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (80%)
Impact
Resource Hijacking (80%)