Comparison Overview
AXA Gulf

AXA Gulf
Floor 39, Churchill Executive Tower, Business Bay, Dubai, undefined, undefined, AE
Last Update: 28/03/2026
Welcome to GIG Gulf, previously AXA. Your 1-stop shop and the most trusted insurance brand in the market, now the #1 regional multi-liner present in 13 countries across the region. We are an ‘A’ rated regional insurer with a top 5 position in each of our markets. We h...

Aflac
1932 Wynnton Rd, Columbus, 31999, US
Last Update: 30/06/2026
Over 50 Million people worldwide have chosen Aflac because of our commitment to providing customers with the confidence that comes from knowing they have assistance in being prepared for whatever life may bring. With Aflac, whether you're a large business or a small o...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

AXA Gulf







Aflac






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for AXA Gulf in 2026.
Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)
Aflac has 94.17% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - AXA Gulf (X = Date, Y = Severity)
AXA Gulf cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Aflac (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Aflac cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

AXA Gulf

Aflac
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
An issue in the SBN UDP interface of NASA cFS v7.0.1 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via transmitting a crafted SBN frame.
A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the cmd_edl function of OreSat Firmware v1.0. The vulnerability is triggered when processing the edl fw_flash command, where the <filename> argument is copied to a 64-byte stack buffer via memcpy without proper length validation. An attacker with physical access to the UART3 serial interface can exploit this vulnerability by sending a maliciously crafted command with an oversized filename parameter,
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Violation of Secure Design Principles vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated privileges. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.