Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

AVL in North America SimulationAVL in North America Simulation
VS
DENSODENSO
AVL in North America Simulation

AVL in North America Simulation

47519 Halyard Dr, Plymouth, 48170, US

Last Update: 26/03/2026

View Profile
747/1000Moderate

AVL North America Inc.: Established in 1994 for AVL to serve its North American clients directly, AVL North America has a staff of more than 650 + people and has five technical centers in Ann Arbor, Michigan, the Metro Detroit area, and Lake Forest, California. These te...

NAICS:3361
NAICS Definition:Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:19
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
DENSO

DENSO

24777 Denso Dr, Southfield, 48033, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
776/1000Fair

DENSO is one of the world's largest automotive suppliers with a 75-year history of providing advanced automotive systems and technology to automakers worldwide. While our products are featured on nearly every vehicle make and model on the road today, we're also looking ...

NAICS:3361
NAICS Definition:Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:18,971
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
AVL in North America Simulation

AVL in North America Simulation

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
DENSO

DENSO

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AVL in North America Simulation in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DENSO in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - AVL in North America Simulation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AVL in North America Simulation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - DENSO (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DENSO cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
AVL in North America Simulation

AVL in North America Simulation

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
DENSO

DENSO

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
DEN2502322

FAQ

Between AVL in North America Simulation company and DENSO company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between AVL in North America Simulation company and DENSO company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between AVL in North America Simulation company and DENSO company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between AVL in North America Simulation company and DENSO company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between AVL in North America Simulation company and DENSO company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between AVL in North America Simulation company and DENSO company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between AVL in North America Simulation company and DENSO company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between AVL in North America Simulation company and DENSO company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between AVL in North America Simulation company and DENSO company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between AVL in North America Simulation company and DENSO company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between AVL in North America Simulation company and DENSO company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between AVL in North America Simulation and DENSO, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between AVL in North America Simulation and DENSO, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - AVL in North America Simulation or DENSO ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - AVL in North America Simulation or DENSO ?
Between AVL in North America Simulation and DENSO, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between AVL in North America Simulation and DENSO, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8