Comparison Overview
AVG Technologies

AVG Technologies
Prague, CZ
Last Update: 03/09/2026
AVG Technologies was acquired in 2016 by Avast. Please follow us over at Avast: https://www.linkedin.com/company/avast/ AVG delivers products and services to help make your digital world simpler to navigate, easier to secure, and more enjoyable to live in. Using the la...

Amazon
2127 7th Ave., Seattle, 98109, US
Last Update: 08/10/2026
Amazon is guided by four principles: customer obsession rather than competitor focus, passion for invention, commitment to operational excellence, and long-term thinking. We are driven by the excitement of building technologies, inventing products, and providing service...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

AVG Technologies







Amazon






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
AVG Technologies has 4.76% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
Amazon has 1088.12% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - AVG Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)
AVG Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Amazon (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Amazon cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

AVG Technologies

Amazon
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.
Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.
A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.
Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.