Autotrader US
Company Details
Linkedin ID:
autotrader-com
Website:
Employees number:
1,266
Number of followers:
39,819
NAICS:
541613
Industry Type:
Homepage:
autotrader.com
IP Addresses:
76
Company ID:
AUT_2171818
Scan Status:
Completed
Autotrader US Company CyberSecurity Posture
autotrader.com
Autotrader is the most visited third-party car shopping site, with the most engaged audience of in-market shoppers. As the foremost authority on automotive consumer insights and expert in online and mobile marketing, Autotrader makes the car shopping experience easy and fun for today's empowered consumer looking to find or sell the perfect new, used or Certified Pre-Owned car. Using technology, shopper insights and local market guidance, Autotrader's comprehensive marketing solutions guide dealers to personalized digital marketing strategies that grow brand, drive traffic and connect the online and in-store shopping experience. Autotrader is a Cox Automotive™ brand. Cox Automotive is a subsidiary of Cox Enterprises. For more information, please visit http://press.autotrader.com.
Autotrader US A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
Autotrader US Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 700 and 749
Autotrader US
Updated:
- Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
- Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
Autotrader US Global Score (TPRM)XXXX
Autotrader US
- Instant access to detailed risk factors
- Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
- Vulnerabilities
- Findings
Autotrader US Company CyberSecurity News & History
Past Incidents
5
Attack Types
4
Autotrader US
Data Leak
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack limited on finance or reputation
Description: In January 2023, 1.4M records from the Autotrader online vehicle marketplace appeared on a popular hacking forum. The data relates to aged listing data that was generally publicly available on our site at the time and open to automated collection methods. The data contained 20k unique email addresses alongside physical addresses and phone numbers of dealers and vehicle details including VIN numbers.
Cox Communications
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: Cox Communications, a large cable company recently suffered a data breach incident in December 2021. The attackers impersonated a Cox agent through a social engineering attack and managed to access the company's customer data. The compromised data includes address, telephone number, Cox account number, usernames, and other personal information of the customers. The company with the help of cyber security experts investigated the attack and secured its data from such future attacks and notified the affected customers of the breach.
Cox Communications
Cyber Attack
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the economy of a geographical region
Description: Cox Communications suffered a cyber attack that caused an internet outage that affected the Tucson region. no customer information was compromised in the attack. however, the Cox says their efforts to stop the attack were the reason for the internet outage.
Cox Enterprises
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization's existence
Description: Cox Enterprises, a U.S.-based conglomerate with operations in telecommunications, media, and automotive services (e.g., Cox Communications, Autotrader), suffered a **sophisticated data breach** via a **zero-day exploit (CVE-2025-61882)** in Oracle’s E-Business Suite. Hackers, linked to the **Cl0p ransomware group**, infiltrated the network between **August 9–14, 2025**, exfiltrating **1.6TB of data**—including **sensitive personal information of 9,479 individuals** (names, addresses, dates of birth, Social Security numbers, and internal documents). The breach was detected in **late September 2025**, with Cl0p leaking the data on the dark web. The attack exploited an **unpatched critical vulnerability (CVSS 9.8)** allowing unauthorized database access, heightening risks of **identity theft, financial fraud, and reputational damage**. Oracle released an emergency patch post-breach, but the delay enabled widespread exploitation across other high-profile targets (e.g., The Washington Post, Harvard University). Cox offered affected parties **credit monitoring**, though long-term risks persist. The incident underscores vulnerabilities in **ERP systems**, **supply chain security gaps**, and the escalating threat of **ransomware-as-a-service (RaaS)** campaigns targeting enterprise software.
Cox Enterprises
Ransomware
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence
Description: Cox Enterprises disclosed a data breach stemming from a zero-day exploit (CVE-2025-61882) in Oracle E-Business Suite, discovered in late September 2024 after hackers breached its network in August. The Cl0p ransomware group claimed responsibility, exploiting the vulnerability before Oracle released a patch on October 5. While the company confirmed exposure of personal data, the specific types of compromised information (e.g., financial, employee, or customer records) were not disclosed. The delayed detection suggests prolonged unauthorized access, though the full scope of the leak—including whether sensitive data like SSNs, financial details, or proprietary business information was exfiltrated—remains unclear. The incident underscores the risks of third-party software vulnerabilities and the operational gaps in timely threat detection.
Autotrader US Company Scoring based on AI Models
Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
Underwriter Stats for Autotrader US
Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Autotrader US in 2025.
Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Autotrader US in 2025.
Incident Types Autotrader US vs Advertising Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Autotrader US in 2025.
Incident History — Autotrader US (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Autotrader US cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
Autotrader US Company Subsidiaries
Autotrader is the most visited third-party car shopping site, with the most engaged audience of in-market shoppers. As the foremost authority on automotive consumer insights and expert in online and mobile marketing, Autotrader makes the car shopping experience easy and fun for today's empowered consumer looking to find or sell the perfect new, used or Certified Pre-Owned car. Using technology, shopper insights and local market guidance, Autotrader's comprehensive marketing solutions guide dealers to personalized digital marketing strategies that grow brand, drive traffic and connect the online and in-store shopping experience. Autotrader is a Cox Automotive™ brand. Cox Automotive is a subsidiary of Cox Enterprises. For more information, please visit http://press.autotrader.com.
Loading...
Autotrader US Similar Companies
Clinic
Clinic is an independent creative agency. We create bold ideas, and craft them beautifully, to get people thinking, believing and doing. All of our experience goes into what we do today, and although our world’s constantly changing, the endpoint is still people and their experience, no matter
TBWA\Worldwide
TBWA is The Disruption Company®. We are a Collective of creative minds with an unlimited creative canvas. We create brand platforms that defy convention and compete with culture. Thanks to our trademarked Disruption® methodology, we build the world’s strongest brands. Brands that own an unfair share
Ogilvy
Ogilvy has been creating impact for brands through iconic, culture-changing, value-driving ideas since the company was founded by David Ogilvy 75 years ago. We build on that rich legacy through Borderless Creativity – innovating at the intersections of its advertising, public relations, relationship
dentsu
We are dentsu. We team together to help brands predict and plan for disruptive future opportunities and create new paths to growth in the sustainable economy. We know people better than anyone else and we use those insights to connect brand, content, commerce and experience, underpinned by modern cr
Interpublic Group (IPG)
Interpublic (NYSE: IPG) is a values-based, data-fueled, and creatively-driven provider of marketing solutions. Home to some of the world’s best-known and most innovative communications specialists, IPG global brands include Acxiom, Craft, FCB, FutureBrand, Golin, Initiative, IPG Health, IPG Mediabra
IPG Mediabrands
IPG Mediabrands is the media and marketing solutions division of Interpublic Group (NYSE: IPG). IPG Mediabrands manages over $47 billion in marketing investment globally on behalf of its clients across its full-service agency networks UM, Initiative and Mediahub and through its award-winning special
Havas
TO MAKE A MEANINGFUL DIFFERENCE TO BRANDS, TO BUSINESSES AND TO PEOPLE Founded in 1835 in Paris, Havas is one of the world’s largest global communications networks, with more than 23,000 people in over 100 markets sharing one single mission: to make a meaningful difference to brands, businesses, a
Clear Channel Europe
Clear Channel Europe is a division of leading global Out of Home media company, Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: CCO). The Clear Channel Europe portfolio spans 14 markets with 260,000 advertising panels. Clear Channel Europe has 2,600 dedicated employees. Our Mission is To Create the fu
Founded in 1926 by Marcel Bleustein-Blanchet, today Publicis Groupe is the largest communications group in the world and a leader in marketing, communication, and digital business transformation, led by Arthur Sadoun, the third CEO in its history. Publicis Groupe is positioned at every step of the
.png)
Autotrader US CyberSecurity News
September 15, 2025 07:00 AM
Hyundai IONIQ 5 Named To Autotrader's 10 Best Electric Cars for 2025
The 2025 IONIQ 5 has been named one of Autotrader's 10 Best Electric Cars for 2025. This marks the fourth consecutive year the compact SUV...
September 04, 2025 07:00 AM
Autotrader's 10 Must-Have Tailgating Features for 2025
While some may think of Labor Day as the official start of fall, others would argue that the first big football game is the season's true...
August 05, 2025 07:00 AM
Autotrader, Kenan Thompson Push Personalization With AI-Powered Car Shopping Ad
Autotrader taps AI and consumer data in its latest campaign with SNL's Kenan Thompson to simplify car shopping.
August 05, 2025 07:00 AM
Autotrader Named America's Most Reputable Auto Retailer
Autotrader, a Cox Automotive brand, has been recognized as the Most Reputable Auto Retailer in the U.S., according to Morning Consult's...
August 04, 2025 07:00 AM
Autotrader, Powered by Auto Intelligence, Redefines the Personalized Car Buying Experience
Autotrader, a Cox Automotive brand, is redefining the car buying experience with the launch of its new national ad campaign titled,...
June 30, 2025 07:00 AM
Autotrader Names Best Car Interiors Under $50,000 for 2025
One of the primary joys of getting a new car is basking in the thrill of an eye-catching exterior, but most buyers know ultimately,...
April 17, 2025 07:00 AM
Judge Rules “Tester” Plaintiffs Cannot Bring Wiretap Claims under California Invasion of Privacy Act
a California federal court just held that a “tester” plaintiff—someone who visits websites to initiate litigation—cannot bring a claim under the...
April 07, 2025 07:00 AM
Autotrader.com Online Privacy Suit Tossed for Lack of Standing
An invasion of privacy claim against Autotrader.com Inc. is dismissed because the plaintiff couldn't show that she has standing to sue the...
November 07, 2024 08:00 AM
Auto Trader introduces AI solutions to enhance automotive retailing
Auto Trader has launched Co-Driver, a suite of artificial intelligence (AI)-driven solutions designed to transform automotive retailing.
Frequently Asked Questions
Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.
Autotrader US CyberSecurity History Information
Official Website of Autotrader US
The official website of Autotrader US is https://b2b.autotrader.com/.
Autotrader US’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score
According to Rankiteo, Autotrader US’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 715, reflecting their Moderate security posture.
How many security badges does Autotrader US’ have ?
According to Rankiteo, Autotrader US currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.
Does Autotrader US have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Autotrader US is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.
Does Autotrader US have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Autotrader US does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
Does Autotrader US comply with GDPR ?
According to Rankiteo, Autotrader US is not listed as GDPR compliant.
Does Autotrader US have PCI DSS certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Autotrader US does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.
Does Autotrader US comply with HIPAA ?
According to Rankiteo, Autotrader US is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.
Does Autotrader US have ISO 27001 certification ?
According to Rankiteo,Autotrader US is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.
Industry Classification of Autotrader US
Autotrader US operates primarily in the Advertising Services industry.
Number of Employees at Autotrader US
Autotrader US employs approximately 1,266 people worldwide.
Subsidiaries Owned by Autotrader US
Autotrader US presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.
Autotrader US’s LinkedIn Followers
Autotrader US’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 39,819 followers.
NAICS Classification of Autotrader US
Autotrader US is classified under the NAICS code 541613, which corresponds to Marketing Consulting Services.
Autotrader US’s Presence on Crunchbase
No, Autotrader US does not have a profile on Crunchbase.
Autotrader US’s Presence on LinkedIn
Yes, Autotrader US maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/autotrader-com.
Cybersecurity Incidents Involving Autotrader US
As of December 17, 2025, Rankiteo reports that Autotrader US has experienced 5 cybersecurity incidents.
Number of Peer and Competitor Companies
Autotrader US has an estimated 32,671 peer or competitor companies worldwide.
What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at Autotrader US ?
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Data Leak, Cyber Attack, Breach and Ransomware.
How does Autotrader US detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an third party assistance with cyber security experts, and recovery measures with investigated the attack and secured its data from such future attacks, and communication strategy with notified the affected customers of the breach, and containment measures with efforts to stop the attack, and and communication strategy with public disclosure emphasizing no customer data compromise, and and third party assistance with potential involvement of mandiant (forensic investigation), and containment measures with patch application (oracle emergency patch on 2025-10-04), containment measures with network segmentation (assumed), and remediation measures with free credit monitoring for affected individuals, remediation measures with ongoing forensic investigation, and communication strategy with notification letters to affected parties, communication strategy with public disclosure via maine attorney general’s office filing, and network segmentation with recommended (not explicitly confirmed), and enhanced monitoring with recommended (not explicitly confirmed)..
Incident Details
Can you provide details on each incident ?
Title: Cox Communications Data Breach
Description: Cox Communications suffered a data breach incident in December 2021 where attackers impersonated a Cox agent through a social engineering attack and accessed customer data.
Date Detected: December 2021
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Social Engineering
Vulnerability Exploited: Human vulnerability through impersonation
Title: Cyber Attack on Cox Communications
Description: Cox Communications suffered a cyber attack that caused an internet outage affecting the Tucson region. No customer information was compromised in the attack. The efforts to stop the attack were the reason for the internet outage.
Type: Cyber Attack
Title: Autotrader Data Breach
Description: In January 2023, 1.4 million records from the Autotrader online vehicle marketplace appeared on a popular hacking forum. The data relates to aged listing data that was generally publicly available on our site at the time and open to automated collection methods. The data contained 20,000 unique email addresses alongside physical addresses and phone numbers of dealers and vehicle details including VIN numbers.
Date Detected: 2023-01-01
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Automated Collection Methods
Vulnerability Exploited: Publicly Available Data
Title: CrowdStrike Insider Threat Incident
Description: CrowdStrike confirmed that an insider shared screenshots taken on internal systems. The company emphasized that its systems were not breached, and customers’ data was not compromised. The threat group responsible was not specified.
Type: Insider Threat
Attack Vector: Internal (Insider)
Title: The Silent Siege: Cox Enterprises’ Oracle Breach and the Shadowy World of Zero-Day Exploits
Description: Cox Enterprises, a U.S. conglomerate in telecommunications, media, and automotive services, suffered a data breach due to a zero-day exploit (CVE-2025-61882) in Oracle’s E-Business Suite. The breach, attributed to the Cl0p ransomware group, exposed sensitive personal data of 9,479 individuals, including names, addresses, dates of birth, Social Security numbers, and other identifiers. The incident occurred between August 9–14, 2025, but was detected in late September. Cl0p leaked 1.6 TB of stolen data on the dark web, and Cox offered affected parties free credit monitoring. The breach highlights vulnerabilities in ERP systems and the risks of delayed patching, with broader implications for supply chain security and regulatory compliance.
Date Detected: 2025-09-01T00:00:00Z
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025-09-30T00:00:00Z
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Zero-Day Exploit (CVE-2025-61882)Unauthenticated AccessMulti-Stage Java ImplantsData Exfiltration
Vulnerability Exploited: CVE-2025-61882 (Critical Authentication Bypass in Oracle E-Business Suite)
Threat Actor: Cl0p Ransomware Group (alleged)
Motivation: Financial GainData TheftExtortion
What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?
Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Breach.
How does the company identify the attack vectors used in incidents ?
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through Zero-day exploit (CVE-2025-61882) in Oracle E-Business Suite.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the impact of each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach COX152930322
Data Compromised: Address, Telephone number, Cox account number, Usernames, Other personal information
Incident : Cyber Attack COX2035161122
Systems Affected: Internet Services
Downtime: Internet Outage
Operational Impact: Internet Services Disrupted
Incident : Data Breach AUT221524123
Data Compromised: Email addresses, Physical addresses, Phone numbers, Vehicle details including vin numbers
Incident : Insider Threat COX1495114112425
Data Compromised: Internal screenshots (no customer data)
Brand Reputation Impact: Potential reputational risk due to insider incident
Incident : Data Breach COX53102453112425
Data Compromised: Names, Addresses, Dates of birth, Social security numbers, Personal identifiers, Internal documents, Employee records, Customer details
Systems Affected: Oracle E-Business SuiteERP SystemsDatabases
Operational Impact: Potential disruption to HR, financial, and supply chain operations
Brand Reputation Impact: High (potential erosion of customer trust, regulatory scrutiny)
Legal Liabilities: Potential lawsuits (e.g., Bloomberg Law report on Oracle’s liability)Regulatory fines under GDPR/CCPA
Identity Theft Risk: High (9,479 individuals affected)
What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Address, Telephone Number, Cox Account Number, Usernames, Other Personal Information, , Email Addresses, Physical Addresses, Phone Numbers, Vehicle Details Including Vin Numbers, , Internal screenshots, Pii (Personally Identifiable Information), Internal Documents, Employee Records, Customer Details and .
Which entities were affected by each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach COX152930322
Entity Name: Cox Communications
Entity Type: Corporation
Industry: Telecommunications
Size: Large
Incident : Cyber Attack COX2035161122
Entity Name: Cox Communications
Entity Type: Telecommunications Company
Industry: Telecommunications
Location: Tucson Region
Incident : Data Breach AUT221524123
Entity Name: Autotrader
Entity Type: Company
Industry: Online Vehicle Marketplace
Incident : Insider Threat COX1495114112425
Entity Name: CrowdStrike
Entity Type: Cybersecurity Company
Industry: Technology
Location: Global (HQ: USA)
Customers Affected: None (no customer data compromised)
Incident : Data Breach COX53102453112425
Entity Name: Cox Enterprises
Entity Type: Conglomerate
Industry: Telecommunications, Media, Automotive Services
Location: United States
Size: 55,000+ employees, $23B+ annual revenue
Customers Affected: 9,479 individuals
Response to the Incidents
What measures were taken in response to each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach COX152930322
Incident Response Plan Activated: True
Third Party Assistance: Cyber security experts
Recovery Measures: Investigated the attack and secured its data from such future attacks
Communication Strategy: Notified the affected customers of the breach
Incident : Cyber Attack COX2035161122
Containment Measures: Efforts to stop the attack
Incident : Insider Threat COX1495114112425
Incident Response Plan Activated: True
Communication Strategy: Public disclosure emphasizing no customer data compromise
Incident : Data Breach COX53102453112425
Incident Response Plan Activated: True
Third Party Assistance: Potential Involvement Of Mandiant (Forensic Investigation).
Containment Measures: Patch application (Oracle emergency patch on 2025-10-04)Network segmentation (assumed)
Remediation Measures: Free credit monitoring for affected individualsOngoing forensic investigation
Communication Strategy: Notification letters to affected partiesPublic disclosure via Maine Attorney General’s Office filing
Network Segmentation: Recommended (not explicitly confirmed)
Enhanced Monitoring: Recommended (not explicitly confirmed)
How does the company involve third-party assistance in incident response ?
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through Cyber security experts, Potential involvement of Mandiant (forensic investigation), .
Data Breach Information
What type of data was compromised in each breach ?
Incident : Data Breach COX152930322
Type of Data Compromised: Address, Telephone number, Cox account number, Usernames, Other personal information
Incident : Data Breach AUT221524123
Type of Data Compromised: Email addresses, Physical addresses, Phone numbers, Vehicle details including vin numbers
Number of Records Exposed: 1,400,000
Incident : Insider Threat COX1495114112425
Type of Data Compromised: Internal screenshots
Sensitivity of Data: Moderate (internal systems)
File Types Exposed: Screenshots
Incident : Data Breach COX53102453112425
Type of Data Compromised: Pii (personally identifiable information), Internal documents, Employee records, Customer details
Number of Records Exposed: 9,479 individuals
Sensitivity of Data: High (includes SSNs, dates of birth, addresses)
Data Exfiltration: 1.6 TB of data leaked on the dark web
File Types Exposed: DatabasesDocumentsHR/Employee Records
What measures does the company take to prevent data exfiltration ?
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: Free credit monitoring for affected individuals, Ongoing forensic investigation, .
How does the company handle incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) ?
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through by efforts to stop the attack, patch application (oracle emergency patch on 2025-10-04), network segmentation (assumed) and .
Ransomware Information
Was ransomware involved in any of the incidents ?
How does the company recover data encrypted by ransomware ?
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through Investigated the attack and secured its data from such future attacks.
Regulatory Compliance
Were there any regulatory violations and fines imposed for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach COX53102453112425
Regulations Violated: Potential GDPR (EU), CCPA (California), State breach notification laws (e.g., Maine),
Legal Actions: Potential lawsuits (e.g., against Oracle for delayed patching),
Regulatory Notifications: Maine Attorney General’s Office filingCISA alerts for related vulnerabilities (e.g., CVE-2025-61757)
How does the company ensure compliance with regulatory requirements ?
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through Potential lawsuits (e.g., against Oracle for delayed patching), .
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What lessons were learned from each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach COX53102453112425
Lessons Learned: Zero-day exploits in ERP systems pose severe risks due to their central role in operations., Delayed detection (weeks between breach and discovery) exacerbates impact., Supply chain vulnerabilities (e.g., Oracle software) require proactive patch management., Ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS) models enable scalable, sophisticated attacks., Public disclosure strategies must balance transparency with investigative integrity.
What recommendations were made to prevent future incidents ?
Incident : Data Breach COX53102453112425
Recommendations: Immediate patching of critical vulnerabilities (e.g., CVE-2025-61882)., Adoption of zero-trust architectures and multi-factor authentication (MFA)., Enhanced vulnerability scanning and threat hunting capabilities., Network segmentation to limit lateral movement., Regular employee training on phishing and social engineering., Collaboration with vendors (e.g., Oracle) for out-of-band patches., Proactive dark web monitoring for leaked data., Investment in AI-driven anomaly detection systems., International cooperation for cross-border cybercrime investigations.Immediate patching of critical vulnerabilities (e.g., CVE-2025-61882)., Adoption of zero-trust architectures and multi-factor authentication (MFA)., Enhanced vulnerability scanning and threat hunting capabilities., Network segmentation to limit lateral movement., Regular employee training on phishing and social engineering., Collaboration with vendors (e.g., Oracle) for out-of-band patches., Proactive dark web monitoring for leaked data., Investment in AI-driven anomaly detection systems., International cooperation for cross-border cybercrime investigations.Immediate patching of critical vulnerabilities (e.g., CVE-2025-61882)., Adoption of zero-trust architectures and multi-factor authentication (MFA)., Enhanced vulnerability scanning and threat hunting capabilities., Network segmentation to limit lateral movement., Regular employee training on phishing and social engineering., Collaboration with vendors (e.g., Oracle) for out-of-band patches., Proactive dark web monitoring for leaked data., Investment in AI-driven anomaly detection systems., International cooperation for cross-border cybercrime investigations.Immediate patching of critical vulnerabilities (e.g., CVE-2025-61882)., Adoption of zero-trust architectures and multi-factor authentication (MFA)., Enhanced vulnerability scanning and threat hunting capabilities., Network segmentation to limit lateral movement., Regular employee training on phishing and social engineering., Collaboration with vendors (e.g., Oracle) for out-of-band patches., Proactive dark web monitoring for leaked data., Investment in AI-driven anomaly detection systems., International cooperation for cross-border cybercrime investigations.Immediate patching of critical vulnerabilities (e.g., CVE-2025-61882)., Adoption of zero-trust architectures and multi-factor authentication (MFA)., Enhanced vulnerability scanning and threat hunting capabilities., Network segmentation to limit lateral movement., Regular employee training on phishing and social engineering., Collaboration with vendors (e.g., Oracle) for out-of-band patches., Proactive dark web monitoring for leaked data., Investment in AI-driven anomaly detection systems., International cooperation for cross-border cybercrime investigations.Immediate patching of critical vulnerabilities (e.g., CVE-2025-61882)., Adoption of zero-trust architectures and multi-factor authentication (MFA)., Enhanced vulnerability scanning and threat hunting capabilities., Network segmentation to limit lateral movement., Regular employee training on phishing and social engineering., Collaboration with vendors (e.g., Oracle) for out-of-band patches., Proactive dark web monitoring for leaked data., Investment in AI-driven anomaly detection systems., International cooperation for cross-border cybercrime investigations.Immediate patching of critical vulnerabilities (e.g., CVE-2025-61882)., Adoption of zero-trust architectures and multi-factor authentication (MFA)., Enhanced vulnerability scanning and threat hunting capabilities., Network segmentation to limit lateral movement., Regular employee training on phishing and social engineering., Collaboration with vendors (e.g., Oracle) for out-of-band patches., Proactive dark web monitoring for leaked data., Investment in AI-driven anomaly detection systems., International cooperation for cross-border cybercrime investigations.Immediate patching of critical vulnerabilities (e.g., CVE-2025-61882)., Adoption of zero-trust architectures and multi-factor authentication (MFA)., Enhanced vulnerability scanning and threat hunting capabilities., Network segmentation to limit lateral movement., Regular employee training on phishing and social engineering., Collaboration with vendors (e.g., Oracle) for out-of-band patches., Proactive dark web monitoring for leaked data., Investment in AI-driven anomaly detection systems., International cooperation for cross-border cybercrime investigations.Immediate patching of critical vulnerabilities (e.g., CVE-2025-61882)., Adoption of zero-trust architectures and multi-factor authentication (MFA)., Enhanced vulnerability scanning and threat hunting capabilities., Network segmentation to limit lateral movement., Regular employee training on phishing and social engineering., Collaboration with vendors (e.g., Oracle) for out-of-band patches., Proactive dark web monitoring for leaked data., Investment in AI-driven anomaly detection systems., International cooperation for cross-border cybercrime investigations.
What are the key lessons learned from past incidents ?
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are Zero-day exploits in ERP systems pose severe risks due to their central role in operations.,Delayed detection (weeks between breach and discovery) exacerbates impact.,Supply chain vulnerabilities (e.g., Oracle software) require proactive patch management.,Ransomware-as-a-Service (RaaS) models enable scalable, sophisticated attacks.,Public disclosure strategies must balance transparency with investigative integrity.
What recommendations has the company implemented to improve cybersecurity ?
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: Proactive dark web monitoring for leaked data., Enhanced vulnerability scanning and threat hunting capabilities., Collaboration with vendors (e.g., Oracle) for out-of-band patches., Immediate patching of critical vulnerabilities (e.g., CVE-2025-61882)., Network segmentation to limit lateral movement., Adoption of zero-trust architectures and multi-factor authentication (MFA)., International cooperation for cross-border cybercrime investigations., Regular employee training on phishing and social engineering. and Investment in AI-driven anomaly detection systems..
References
Where can I find more information about each incident ?
Incident : Insider Threat COX1495114112425
Source: BleepingComputer
Incident : Data Breach COX53102453112425
Source: BleepingComputer
Incident : Data Breach COX53102453112425
Source: Maine Attorney General’s Office (Breach Notification)
Incident : Data Breach COX53102453112425
Source: IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report
Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: BleepingComputer, and Source: BleepingComputerUrl: https://www.bleepingcomputer.com, and Source: SecurityWeekUrl: https://www.securityweek.com, and Source: The Hacker NewsUrl: https://thehackernews.com, and Source: TechRadarUrl: https://www.techradar.com, and Source: Bloomberg LawUrl: https://news.bloomberglaw.com, and Source: Maine Attorney General’s Office (Breach Notification), and Source: CISA AlertsUrl: https://www.cisa.gov, and Source: IBM Cost of a Data Breach ReportUrl: https://www.ibm.com/reports/data-breach.
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the investigation for each incident ?
Incident : Insider Threat COX1495114112425
Investigation Status: Confirmed (insider incident)
Incident : Data Breach COX53102453112425
Investigation Status: Ongoing (forensic investigation, potential third-party involvement)
How does the company communicate the status of incident investigations to stakeholders ?
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through Notified the affected customers of the breach, Public disclosure emphasizing no customer data compromise, Notification Letters To Affected Parties and Public Disclosure Via Maine Attorney General’S Office Filing.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Were there any advisories issued to stakeholders or customers for each incident ?
Incident : Insider Threat COX1495114112425
Customer Advisories: No customer data compromised
Incident : Data Breach COX53102453112425
Stakeholder Advisories: Notification Letters To Affected Individuals, Public Statements Via Regulatory Filings.
Customer Advisories: Free credit monitoring offered to affected parties
What advisories does the company provide to stakeholders and customers following an incident ?
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: were No customer data compromised, Notification Letters To Affected Individuals, Public Statements Via Regulatory Filings and Free credit monitoring offered to affected parties.
Initial Access Broker
How did the initial access broker gain entry for each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach COX53102453112425
Entry Point: Zero-day exploit (CVE-2025-61882) in Oracle E-Business Suite
Reconnaissance Period: Potentially since July 2025 (part of broader Cl0p campaign)
Backdoors Established: ['Multi-stage Java implants']
High Value Targets: Erp Databases, Hr Systems, Financial Records,
Data Sold on Dark Web: Erp Databases, Hr Systems, Financial Records,
Post-Incident Analysis
What were the root causes and corrective actions taken for each incident ?
Incident : Insider Threat COX1495114112425
Root Causes: Insider threat (unauthorized screenshot sharing)
Incident : Data Breach COX53102453112425
Root Causes: Unpatched Zero-Day Vulnerability (Cve-2025-61882) In Oracle E-Business Suite., Delayed Detection (Weeks Between Intrusion And Discovery)., Lack Of Proactive Threat Hunting For Erp-Specific Attacks., Potential Gaps In Network Segmentation Or Access Controls.,
Corrective Actions: Applied Oracle’S Emergency Patch (2025-10-04)., Enhanced Monitoring For Erp Systems., Review Of Third-Party Software Patching Policies., Potential Restructuring Of Incident Response Protocols To Reduce Detection Lag.,
What is the company's process for conducting post-incident analysis ?
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as Cyber security experts, Potential Involvement Of Mandiant (Forensic Investigation), , Recommended (not explicitly confirmed).
What corrective actions has the company taken based on post-incident analysis ?
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: Applied Oracle’S Emergency Patch (2025-10-04)., Enhanced Monitoring For Erp Systems., Review Of Third-Party Software Patching Policies., Potential Restructuring Of Incident Response Protocols To Reduce Detection Lag., .
Additional Questions
General Information
Who was the attacking group in the last incident ?
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was an Cl0p Ransomware Group (alleged).
Incident Details
What was the most recent incident detected ?
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on December 2021.
What was the most recent incident publicly disclosed ?
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on 2025-09-30T00:00:00Z.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were Address, Telephone number, Cox account number, Usernames, Other personal information, , Email addresses, Physical addresses, Phone numbers, Vehicle details including VIN numbers, , Internal screenshots (no customer data), Names, Addresses, Dates of Birth, Social Security Numbers, Personal Identifiers, Internal Documents, Employee Records, Customer Details and .
What was the most significant system affected in an incident ?
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was Oracle E-Business SuiteERP SystemsDatabases.
Response to the Incidents
What third-party assistance was involved in the most recent incident ?
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was Cyber security experts, potential involvement of mandiant (forensic investigation), .
What containment measures were taken in the most recent incident ?
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were Efforts to stop the attack and Patch application (Oracle emergency patch on 2025-10-04)Network segmentation (assumed).
Data Breach Information
What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were Physical addresses, Phone numbers, Personal Identifiers, Internal Documents, Other personal information, Names, Dates of Birth, Customer Details, Usernames, Cox account number, Address, Email addresses, Vehicle details including VIN numbers, Addresses, Social Security Numbers, Internal screenshots (no customer data), Employee Records and Telephone number.
What was the number of records exposed in the most significant breach ?
Number of Records Exposed in Most Significant Breach: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was 1.4M.
Regulatory Compliance
What was the most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation ?
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was Potential lawsuits (e.g., against Oracle for delayed patching), .
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What was the most significant lesson learned from past incidents ?
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was Public disclosure strategies must balance transparency with investigative integrity.
What was the most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity ?
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was Proactive dark web monitoring for leaked data., Enhanced vulnerability scanning and threat hunting capabilities., Collaboration with vendors (e.g., Oracle) for out-of-band patches., Immediate patching of critical vulnerabilities (e.g., CVE-2025-61882)., Network segmentation to limit lateral movement., Adoption of zero-trust architectures and multi-factor authentication (MFA)., International cooperation for cross-border cybercrime investigations., Regular employee training on phishing and social engineering. and Investment in AI-driven anomaly detection systems..
References
What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident are IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report, BleepingComputer, Maine Attorney General’s Office (Breach Notification), The Hacker News, SecurityWeek, Bloomberg Law, CISA Alerts and TechRadar.
What is the most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?
Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is https://www.bleepingcomputer.com, https://www.securityweek.com, https://thehackernews.com, https://www.techradar.com, https://news.bloomberglaw.com, https://www.cisa.gov, https://www.ibm.com/reports/data-breach .
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the most recent investigation ?
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is Confirmed (insider incident).
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
What was the most recent stakeholder advisory issued ?
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was Notification letters to affected individuals, Public statements via regulatory filings, .
What was the most recent customer advisory issued ?
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued were an No customer data compromised and Free credit monitoring offered to affected parties.
Initial Access Broker
What was the most recent entry point used by an initial access broker ?
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was an Zero-day exploit (CVE-2025-61882) in Oracle E-Business Suite.
What was the most recent reconnaissance period for an incident ?
Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was Potentially since July 2025 (part of broader Cl0p campaign).
Post-Incident Analysis
What was the most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis ?
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was Insider threat (unauthorized screenshot sharing), Unpatched zero-day vulnerability (CVE-2025-61882) in Oracle E-Business Suite.Delayed detection (weeks between intrusion and discovery).Lack of proactive threat hunting for ERP-specific attacks.Potential gaps in network segmentation or access controls..
What was the most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis ?
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was Applied Oracle’s emergency patch (2025-10-04).Enhanced monitoring for ERP systems.Review of third-party software patching policies.Potential restructuring of incident response protocols to reduce detection lag..
.png)
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
Description
Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
Description
SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=autotrader-com' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
RapidWhat Do We Measure ?
Incident
Finding
Grade
Digital Assets
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Network Security
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
CMDB (Configuration Management Database)
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Threat Intelligence
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
