Comparison Overview

Autotrader US

VS

Clear Channel Europe

Autotrader US

3003 Summit Blvd., Suite 200, Atlanta, GA, US, 30319
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 700 and 749

Autotrader is the most visited third-party car shopping site, with the most engaged audience of in-market shoppers. As the foremost authority on automotive consumer insights and expert in online and mobile marketing, Autotrader makes the car shopping experience easy and fun for today's empowered consumer looking to find or sell the perfect new, used or Certified Pre-Owned car. Using technology, shopper insights and local market guidance, Autotrader's comprehensive marketing solutions guide dealers to personalized digital marketing strategies that grow brand, drive traffic and connect the online and in-store shopping experience. Autotrader is a Cox Automotive™ brand. Cox Automotive is a subsidiary of Cox Enterprises. For more information, please visit http://press.autotrader.com.

NAICS: 541613
NAICS Definition: Marketing Consulting Services
Employees: 1,266
Subsidiaries: 14
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
4

Clear Channel Europe

33 Golden Square, London, England, W1F 9, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-10

Clear Channel Europe is a division of leading global Out of Home media company, Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: CCO). The Clear Channel Europe portfolio spans 14 markets with 260,000 advertising panels. Clear Channel Europe has 2,600 dedicated employees. Our Mission is To Create the future of media. Transforming our estate, to the benefit of all our stakeholders, through data-driven innovations and infrastructure. Our Purpose is to provide both A Platform for Brands & A Platform for Good. Delivering advertisers’ media objectives whilst having a positive impact on the world around us.

NAICS: 541613
NAICS Definition: Marketing Consulting Services
Employees: 15,759
Subsidiaries: 20
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/autotrader-com.jpeg
Autotrader US
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/clear-channel.jpeg
Clear Channel Europe
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Autotrader US
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Clear Channel Europe
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Autotrader US in 2025.

Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Clear Channel Europe in 2025.

Incident History — Autotrader US (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Autotrader US cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Clear Channel Europe (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Clear Channel Europe cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/autotrader-com.jpeg
Autotrader US
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Zero-Day Exploit (CVE-2025-61882), Unauthenticated Access, Multi-Stage Java Implants, Data Exfiltration
Motivation: Financial Gain, Data Theft, Extortion
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2024
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Internal (Insider)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2023
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Automated Collection Methods
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/clear-channel.jpeg
Clear Channel Europe
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2024
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Clear Channel Europe company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Autotrader US company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Autotrader US company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Clear Channel Europe company.

In the current year, Autotrader US company has reported more cyber incidents than Clear Channel Europe company.

Autotrader US company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Clear Channel Europe company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both Clear Channel Europe company and Autotrader US company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Autotrader US company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Clear Channel Europe company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Autotrader US company nor Clear Channel Europe company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Autotrader US nor Clear Channel Europe holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Clear Channel Europe company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Autotrader US company.

Clear Channel Europe company employs more people globally than Autotrader US company, reflecting its scale as a Advertising Services.

Neither Autotrader US nor Clear Channel Europe holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Autotrader US nor Clear Channel Europe holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Autotrader US nor Clear Channel Europe holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Autotrader US nor Clear Channel Europe holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Autotrader US nor Clear Channel Europe holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Autotrader US nor Clear Channel Europe holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N