Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (AUT3621036112625)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of AutomationDirect's Vulnerability and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts AutomationDirect Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the AutomationDirect breach identified under incident ID AUT3621036112625.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of AutomationDirect's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/automationdirect, the number of followers: 20036, the industry type: Automation Machinery Manufacturing and the number of employees: 313 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 747 and after the incident was 752 with a difference of 5 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on AutomationDirect and their customers.
AutomationDirect recently reported "Critical Authentication Vulnerability in AutomationDirect MB-Gateway Devices (CVE-2025-36535)", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.
Industrial automation firm AutomationDirect's MB-Gateway devices, used in critical infrastructure globally, are affected by a maximum-severity missing authentication vulnerability (CVE-2025-36535).
The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting AutomationDirect MB-Gateway Devices (100+ internet-exposed instances), and exposing Internal IPs, Firmware Versions and Modbus Configuration.
In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Replacement of vulnerable MB-Gateway devices with EKI-1221-CE gateway, and stakeholders are being briefed through Public disclosure via SecurityWeek and CISA advisory.
The case underscores how Disclosed (vulnerability confirmed; no active exploitation reported), teams are taking away lessons such as Hardware limitations can render vulnerabilities unpatchable, necessitating full device replacement. Critical infrastructure devices require rigorous authentication mechanisms to prevent remote exploitation, and recommending next steps like Replace vulnerable MB-Gateway devices with EKI-1221-CE immediately, Isolate or remove internet-exposed industrial control systems and Implement network segmentation for critical infrastructure devices, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering CISA alert for critical infrastructure operators.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with high confidence (95%), with evidence including remote intrusions via uncredentialed access to the embedded web interface, and cVE-2025-36535 (Missing Authentication in MB-Gateway Devices) and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating inadequate authentication, allowing attackers to remotely access the configuration panel. Under the Discovery tactic, the analysis identified System Information Discovery (T1082) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating exposing sensitive device parameters—internal IPs, firmware versions, Modbus configurations and System Network Configuration Discovery (T1016) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating serial communication settings via an unsecured embedded web interface. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (85%), with evidence including device Configuration Data, Network Parameters exposed via web interface, and configuration Files, Log Files (potential). Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol (T1048.003) with moderate to high confidence (80%), with evidence including data exfiltration such as Possible (via exposed web interface), and modbus configurations and serial communication settings. Under the Lateral Movement tactic, the analysis identified Remote Services: Remote Desktop Protocol (T1021.001) with moderate to high confidence (75%), with evidence including potential operational disruptions in industrial environments... lateral movement, and exposed internal IPs and Remote Services: SSH (T1021.004) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating exposed internal IPs for follow-on exploitation. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Endpoint Denial of Service: Application or System Exploitation (T1499.004) with moderate to high confidence (85%), with evidence including potential disruption to critical infrastructure operations due to exposed configurations, and sabotage of automated processes in sectors like energy, manufacturing, or water treatment. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- AutomationDirect Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/automationdirect/incident/AUT3621036112625
- AutomationDirect CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/automationdirect
- AutomationDirect Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/aut3621036112625-automationdirect-vulnerability-may-2025/
- AutomationDirect CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/automationdirect/history
- AutomationDirect CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://www.scworld.com/brief/maximum-severity-automationdirect-gateway-bug-threatens-remote-intrusions
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf