Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Aura REE Spain » AUR1773865794

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (AUR1773865794)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-87
Company Score Before Incident753 / 1000
Company Score After Incident666 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERAUR1773865794
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORPhishing (Phone)
DATA EXPOSED900,000 records
INCIDENT DATE10/03/2026
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Aura REE Spain's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Aura REE Spain Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Aura REE Spain breach identified under incident ID AUR1773865794.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Aura REE Spain's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/aura-ree, the number of followers: 6393, the industry type: Real Estate and the number of employees: 36 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 753 and after the incident was 666 with a difference of -87 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Aura REE Spain and their customers.

On 11 March 2026, Aura Group disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Aura Group Data Breach Exposes Nearly 1 Million Records in Phishing Attack".

A security incident at Aura Group, a U.S.-based digital security company, occurred after an employee fell victim to a targeted phone phishing attack, allowing an unauthorized third party to access an internal account for roughly one hour.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Internal marketing tool, and exposing 900,000 records, with nearly 900,000 records at risk.

In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Secured affected systems.

The case underscores how Ongoing.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Phishing (T1566) with high confidence (95%), supported by evidence indicating employee fell victim to a targeted phone phishing attack and Phishing: Vishing (T1566.004) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating targeted phone phishing attack. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution (T1204) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating employee fell victim to a targeted phone phishing attack. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized third party to access an internal account. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (85%), supported by evidence indicating 900,000 records...primarily consisting of names and email addresses. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating shinyHunters claimed responsibility for the breach on the dark web and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating data breach impacting approximately 900,000 records. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating no evidence of data destruction, but breach occurred. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Phishing (95%)
Phishing: Vishing (90%)
Execution
User Execution (80%)
Credential Access
Valid Accounts (90%)
Collection
Data from Local System (85%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (80%)
Transfer Data to Cloud Account (60%)
Impact
Data Destruction (30%)

Sources & References