Comparison Overview
Audi Business Innovation GmbH
Audi Business Innovation GmbH
Helmut-Dietl Straße 1, Munich, 81671, DE
Last Update: 04/01/2026
Audi Business Innovation GmbH, founded in 2013, is a full subsidiary of AUDI AG. It plays a crucial role in the implementation of the current digital shift in the automotive industry. As a company specializing in end-to-end digital product development and innovation, A...
Gainwell Technologies
United States, US
Last Update: 09/10/2026
The people who build careers at Gainwell Technologies share one thing: they want their work to matter. Here, it does. We're the essential ingredient that makes Medicaid work. For more than 50 years, we've combined our sweeping scale and technology to turn complex polic...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Audi Business Innovation GmbH
Gainwell Technologies
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Audi Business Innovation GmbH in 2026.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
Gainwell Technologies has 98.02% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Audi Business Innovation GmbH (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Audi Business Innovation GmbH cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Gainwell Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Gainwell Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Audi Business Innovation GmbH
Gainwell Technologies
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.