Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (ATTIBM1780946436)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of AT&T's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts AT&T Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the AT&T breach identified under incident ID ATTIBM1780946436.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of AT&T's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/att, the number of followers: 1631770, the industry type: Telecommunications and the number of employees: 178894 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 830 and after the incident was 736 with a difference of -94 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on AT&T and their customers.
IBM recently reported "IBM and AT&T Accused of Covering Up Years-Long Data Breaches by Chinese Hackers", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.
A recently unsealed whistleblower lawsuit alleges that IBM and AT&T concealed multiple data breaches spanning from 2013 to 2016, including attacks attributed to Chinese state-backed hackers.
The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting IBM’s core network, at least two IBM subsidiaries, and exposing True.
In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Concealment alleged.
The case underscores how Ongoing (lawsuit).
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating breaches affecting its core network...over 56,000 times and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating aPT 10 may have breached IBM’s systems...poor network design. Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Account Manipulation (T1098) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating breaches spanning from 2013 to 2016...56,000 times and Create Account (T1136) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating aPT 10...breached IBM’s systems over 56,000 times. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating neither IBM nor AT&T could confirm what data was accessed and Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating poor network design and insufficient logging. Under the Discovery tactic, the analysis identified Account Discovery (T1087) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating breaches extended to at least two IBM subsidiaries and Network Service Discovery (T1046) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating aPT 10 may have breached IBM’s systems over 56,000 times. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating data was accessed, altered, or exfiltrated...insufficient logging and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating breaches affecting its core network...state-sponsored espionage. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating data exfiltration such as true...APT 10 (state-sponsored) and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating chinese threat actor APT 10...breached IBM’s systems. Under the Command and Control tactic, the analysis identified Application Layer Protocol (T1071) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating aPT 10...breached IBM’s systems over 56,000 times and Proxy (T1090) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating state-sponsored espionage...concealment alleged. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Indicator Removal (T1070) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating lacked critical logs...alleged cover-up by IBM and AT&T and Impair Defenses (T1562) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating poor network design and insufficient logging. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Defacement (T1491) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating data was accessed, altered, or exfiltrated and Data Destruction (T1485) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating neither IBM nor AT&T could confirm what data was altered. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- AT&T Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/att/incident/ATTIBM1780946436
- AT&T CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/att
- AT&T Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/attibm1780946436-ibm-att-breach-january-2013/
- AT&T CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/att/history
- AT&T CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://www.securitymagazine.com/articles/102353-whistleblower-accuses-ibm-at-and-t-of-covering-up-breaches
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf