Comparison Overview
ATLAS Technology Group

ATLAS Technology Group
5214 Village Pkwy, Rogers, Arkansas, 72758, US
Last Update: 20/02/2026
Atlas helps consumer goods companies make better decisions by harmonizing data and extracting richer insights … in less time. Atlas' single, intuitive interface accelerates the Insight-to-Impact Cycle, while streamlining the flow of information … from data to decision....

Gainwell Technologies
United States, US
Last Update: 22/08/2026
The people who build careers at Gainwell Technologies share one thing: they want their work to matter. Here, it does. We're the essential ingredient that makes Medicaid work. For more than 50 years, we've combined our sweeping scale and technology to turn complex polic...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

ATLAS Technology Group







Gainwell Technologies






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for ATLAS Technology Group in 2026.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
Gainwell Technologies has 98.02% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - ATLAS Technology Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
ATLAS Technology Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Gainwell Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Gainwell Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

ATLAS Technology Group

Gainwell Technologies
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.
Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.
A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.
Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.