Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Atlantic Urology Specialists » ATL1779913498

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (ATL1779913498)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-68
Company Score Before Incident755 / 1000
Company Score After Incident687 / 1000
Company LinkView Atlantic Urology Specialists Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERATL1779913498
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDSensitive health records
INCIDENT DATE21/05/2026
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Atlantic Urology Specialists's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Atlantic Urology Specialists Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Atlantic Urology Specialists breach identified under incident ID ATL1779913498.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Atlantic Urology Specialists's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/atlanticurologyclinics, the number of followers: 722, the industry type: Medical Practices and the number of employees: 92 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 755 and after the incident was 687 with a difference of -68 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Atlantic Urology Specialists and their customers.

Coastal Carolina Centers of Urology and Surgery recently reported "Coastal Carolina Centers of Urology and Surgery Data Breach", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

Coastal Carolina Centers of Urology and Surgery, a South Carolina-based medical practice specializing in urology and surgical services, has disclosed a data breach affecting patient health records.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Sensitive health records.

In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Patients advised to monitor for official communications and contact the practice directly for details.

The case underscores how Ongoing, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Patients advised to monitor for official communications and contact the practice directly for details on response efforts and available support.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating sensitive health records were compromised via undisclosed method and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating medical practices systems may have been targeted. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating health records accessed; likely involved credential compromise and OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating sensitive data breach suggests possible credential harvesting. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating sensitive health records were compromised and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating medical practices health records targeted. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating data breach affecting patient health records and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating healthcare data exfiltration trends. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating ongoing investigation; potential data tampering and Data Manipulation (T1565) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating health records compromised; integrity at risk. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Valid Accounts (60%)
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Credential Access
Unsecured Credentials (60%)
OS Credential Dumping (50%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Data from Information Repositories (70%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Transfer Data to Cloud Account (50%)
Impact
Data Destruction (40%)
Data Manipulation (30%)

Sources & References