Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Atlantic Emergency Solutions » ATL1778445519

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (ATL1778445519)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-27
Company Score Before Incident760 / 1000
Company Score After Incident733 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERATL1778445519
Type of Cyber IncidentCyber Attack
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDNA
INCIDENT DATE31/03/2026
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Atlantic Emergency Solutions's Cyber Attack and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Atlantic Emergency Solutions Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Atlantic Emergency Solutions breach identified under incident ID ATL1778445519.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Atlantic Emergency Solutions's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/atlantic-emergency-solutions, the number of followers: 2136, the industry type: Public Safety and the number of employees: 130 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 760 and after the incident was 733 with a difference of -27 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Atlantic Emergency Solutions and their customers.

Patriot Regional Emergency Communications Center recently reported "Cyberattack Disrupts Emergency Communications in Central Massachusetts Towns", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

A coordinated cyberattack targeted public safety systems in at least five towns in Central Massachusetts this week, disrupting non-emergency phone lines for police, fire, and emergency medical services.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Non-emergency phone lines for police, fire, and emergency medical services.

In response, teams activated the incident response plan.

The case underscores how Ongoing.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (60%), with evidence including coordinated cyberattack targeted public safety systems, and communications center may have been deliberately targeted and External Remote Services (T1133) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating non-emergency phone lines for police, fire, and EMS disrupted. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Endpoint Denial of Service (T1499) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including disrupting non-emergency phone lines for police, fire, and EMS, and 911 services remained operational and Defacement (T1491) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating attack threatening the organizations existence. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating communications center may have been...inadvertently compromised and Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating non-emergency lines experienced outages. Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified External Remote Services (T1133) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating townsend restoring full service shortly after. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (60%)
External Remote Services (50%)
Impact
Endpoint Denial of Service (90%)
Defacement (30%)
Defense Evasion
Valid Accounts (40%)
Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (50%)
Persistence
External Remote Services (40%)

Sources & References